Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Toline, Cristina
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Bresolin, Carmela Rampazzo, Shitsuka, Caleb
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21345
Resumo: Mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth is already a well-established and widely used practice in dentistry today. Several studies show considerable advantages when compared to the manual instrumentation technique, among them one can consider the reduction of surgical time and less discomfort to the patient during and after the procedure. Although the cost is considerably higher when compared to the treatment performed with manual instrumentation, this is justifiable. However, mechanized endodontics for endodontic treatments in pediatric dentistry is still questionable. The objective of this literature review was to identify advantages and disadvantages of the mechanized endodontic procedure in pediatric dentistry. Therefore, we carried out a bibliographic survey, considering publications from 2015 to 2020 on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Scielo, Springer and Cochrane platforms. Seventeen articles were selected, including in vitro studies, systematic reviews, and randomized studies and two bibliographic references, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto, 2012) and the manual “Guidelines for Clinical Procedures in Pediatric Dentistry – ABO”, released in 2020. After screening the materials, 8 articles, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto) and the ABO Manual were included in this review. It was concluded that, despite the significant benefits presented by mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth, no advantages of the technique were observed when applied in pediatric dentistry, unjustifying the high investment.
id UNIFEI_aeb5ba72dd1da9bfb8833ed9c8f0a2f9
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21345
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentitionTratamiento endodóntico mecanizado en dentición deciduaTratamento endodôntico mecanizado em dentição decíduaEndodonciaOdontología Pediatrica;Instrumentación mecanizada;Dientes caducifoliosEndodonticsPediatric dentistryMechanized instrumentationDeciduous teethRoot canal.EndodontiaOdontopediatriaInstrumentação mecanizadaDentes decíduos. Mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth is already a well-established and widely used practice in dentistry today. Several studies show considerable advantages when compared to the manual instrumentation technique, among them one can consider the reduction of surgical time and less discomfort to the patient during and after the procedure. Although the cost is considerably higher when compared to the treatment performed with manual instrumentation, this is justifiable. However, mechanized endodontics for endodontic treatments in pediatric dentistry is still questionable. The objective of this literature review was to identify advantages and disadvantages of the mechanized endodontic procedure in pediatric dentistry. Therefore, we carried out a bibliographic survey, considering publications from 2015 to 2020 on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Scielo, Springer and Cochrane platforms. Seventeen articles were selected, including in vitro studies, systematic reviews, and randomized studies and two bibliographic references, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto, 2012) and the manual “Guidelines for Clinical Procedures in Pediatric Dentistry – ABO”, released in 2020. After screening the materials, 8 articles, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto) and the ABO Manual were included in this review. It was concluded that, despite the significant benefits presented by mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth, no advantages of the technique were observed when applied in pediatric dentistry, unjustifying the high investment.La instrumentación mecanizada en dientes permanentes ya es una práctica bien establecida y ampliamente utilizada en odontología en la actualidad. Varios estudios muestran ventajas considerables en comparación con la técnica de instrumentación manual, entre ellas se puede considerar la reducción del tiempo quirúrgico y menos molestias para el paciente durante y después del procedimiento. Si bien el costo es considerablemente mayor en comparación con el tratamiento realizado con instrumentación manual, esto es justificable. Sin embargo, la endodoncia mecanizada para tratamientos de endodoncia en odontopediatría sigue siendo cuestionable. El objetivo de esta revisión de la literatura fue identificar las ventajas y desventajas del procedimiento de endodoncia mecanizada en odontopediatría. Por ello, realizamos un relevamiento bibliográfico, considerando publicaciones de 2015 a 2020 en las plataformas PubMed, Google Scholar, Scielo, Springer y Cochrane. Se seleccionaron diecisiete artículos, entre estudios in vitro, revisiones sistemáticas y estudios aleatorizados, y dos referencias bibliográficas, el Manual de Odontopediatría (Guedes-Pinto, 2012) y el manual “Guías de Procedimientos Clínicos en Odontopediatría - ABO”, publicado en 2020. Después de la selección de los materiales, se incluyeron en esta revisión 8 artículos, el Manual de Odontopediatría (Guedes-Pinto) y el Manual ABO. Se concluyó que, a pesar de los importantes beneficios que presenta la instrumentación mecanizada en dientes permanentes, no se observaron ventajas de la técnica cuando se aplica en odontopediatría, injustificando la alta inversión.A instrumentação mecanizada em dentes permanentes já é uma prática consolidada e muito utilizada na odontologia atual. Diversos estudos apresentam vantagens consideráveis, quando comparada com a técnica de instrumentação manual, entre elas pode-se considerar a redução de tempo cirúrgico e o menor desconforto ao paciente durante e após o procedimento. Apesar do custo ser consideravelmente maior quando comparado ao tratamento realizado com instrumentação manual, este é justificável. Entretanto, a endodontia mecanizada para tratamentos endodônticos em odontopediatria ainda é questionável. O objetivo desta revisão de literatura foi identificar vantagens e desvantagens do procedimento endodôntico mecanizado em odontopediatria. Para tanto, realizamos levantamento bibliográfico, considerando publicações do período de 2015 a 2020 nas plataformas PubMed, Google Scholar, Scielo, Springer e Cochrane. Foram selecionados 17 artigos, dentre eles, estudos realizados in vitro, revisões sistemáticas e estudos randomizados e duas referências bibliográficas, o Manual de Odontopediatria (Guedes-Pinto, 2012) e o manual “Diretrizes para Procedimentos Clínicos em Odontopediatria – ABO”, lançado em 2020. Após a triagem dos materiais, 8 artigos, o Manual de Odontopediatria (Guedes-Pinto) e o Manual da ABO foram incluídos nesta revisão. Concluiu-se que, apesar dos significativos benefícios apresentados na instrumentação mecanizada em dentes permanentes, não foram observadas vantagens da técnica quando aplicada em odontopediatria, injustificando o alto investimento.Research, Society and Development2021-10-17info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2134510.33448/rsd-v10i13.21345Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e391101321345Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e391101321345Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e3911013213452525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21345/19054Copyright (c) 2021 Cristina Toline; Carmela Rampazzo Bresolin; Caleb Shitsukahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessToline, CristinaBresolin, Carmela RampazzoShitsuka, Caleb 2021-11-21T18:26:28Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/21345Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:40:46.761595Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
Tratamiento endodóntico mecanizado en dentición decidua
Tratamento endodôntico mecanizado em dentição decídua
title Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
spellingShingle Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
Toline, Cristina
Endodoncia
Odontología Pediatrica;
Instrumentación mecanizada;
Dientes caducifolios
Endodontics
Pediatric dentistry
Mechanized instrumentation
Deciduous teeth
Root canal.
Endodontia
Odontopediatria
Instrumentação mecanizada
Dentes decíduos.
title_short Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
title_full Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
title_fullStr Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
title_full_unstemmed Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
title_sort Mechanized endodontic treatment in deciduous dentition
author Toline, Cristina
author_facet Toline, Cristina
Bresolin, Carmela Rampazzo
Shitsuka, Caleb
author_role author
author2 Bresolin, Carmela Rampazzo
Shitsuka, Caleb
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Toline, Cristina
Bresolin, Carmela Rampazzo
Shitsuka, Caleb
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Endodoncia
Odontología Pediatrica;
Instrumentación mecanizada;
Dientes caducifolios
Endodontics
Pediatric dentistry
Mechanized instrumentation
Deciduous teeth
Root canal.
Endodontia
Odontopediatria
Instrumentação mecanizada
Dentes decíduos.
topic Endodoncia
Odontología Pediatrica;
Instrumentación mecanizada;
Dientes caducifolios
Endodontics
Pediatric dentistry
Mechanized instrumentation
Deciduous teeth
Root canal.
Endodontia
Odontopediatria
Instrumentação mecanizada
Dentes decíduos.
description Mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth is already a well-established and widely used practice in dentistry today. Several studies show considerable advantages when compared to the manual instrumentation technique, among them one can consider the reduction of surgical time and less discomfort to the patient during and after the procedure. Although the cost is considerably higher when compared to the treatment performed with manual instrumentation, this is justifiable. However, mechanized endodontics for endodontic treatments in pediatric dentistry is still questionable. The objective of this literature review was to identify advantages and disadvantages of the mechanized endodontic procedure in pediatric dentistry. Therefore, we carried out a bibliographic survey, considering publications from 2015 to 2020 on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Scielo, Springer and Cochrane platforms. Seventeen articles were selected, including in vitro studies, systematic reviews, and randomized studies and two bibliographic references, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto, 2012) and the manual “Guidelines for Clinical Procedures in Pediatric Dentistry – ABO”, released in 2020. After screening the materials, 8 articles, the Pediatric Dentistry Manual (Guedes-Pinto) and the ABO Manual were included in this review. It was concluded that, despite the significant benefits presented by mechanized instrumentation in permanent teeth, no advantages of the technique were observed when applied in pediatric dentistry, unjustifying the high investment.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-17
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21345
10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21345
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21345
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v10i13.21345
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/21345/19054
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Cristina Toline; Carmela Rampazzo Bresolin; Caleb Shitsuka
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Cristina Toline; Carmela Rampazzo Bresolin; Caleb Shitsuka
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 13; e391101321345
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 13; e391101321345
Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 13; e391101321345
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052756798734336

Registros relacionados