Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da, Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva, Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de, Moreira, Késya Rodrigues, Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo, Martins, Iara Saraiva, Leão, Ana Kelly Batista, Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de, Lima, Tatiany Santos, Sousa, Alex José de, Moura, Johnantan Santiago, André, Amélia Soares
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417
Resumo: Throughout the history of mankind, there have been several forms of political and economic organizations that have directly influenced the production work mode. Thus, as a product of the social organization, work is indispensable to meet human needs that go beyond survival. In this sense, the objective of this article is to present the social and economic context of the development of the capitalist system, from the main schools of economic thought: Mercantilism, Classical, Neoclassical, Keynesianism, and New Classical. For this, we resort to studies by Oliveira and Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); Andrade et al (2020); among others. Regarding the methodological path, we used narrative bibliographic research with a qualitative approach. With this, it was possible to affirm that the exploitation of human labor, the extraction of surplus-value, and the concentration of private property are ideas present in all schools of economic thought. In addition, the study of economic models also made it possible to understand economic interactions, allowing us to understand the relationship between supply and demand. Finally, the data obtained further corroborate the importance of the State in drafting laws that regulate the entire process of production and circulation of products and their insertion in the market.
id UNIFEI_c031925b076fc9baec6cd7d2d1426506
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9417
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought Breves notas de las principales escuelas de pensamiento económicoBreves apontamentos das principais escolas de pensamento econômicoMercantilismClassicalNeoclassicalKeynesianismNew classical. MercantilismoClásicoNeoclásicoKeynesianismoNuevo clásico. MercantilismoClássicaNeoclássicaKeynesianismoNovo clássica.Throughout the history of mankind, there have been several forms of political and economic organizations that have directly influenced the production work mode. Thus, as a product of the social organization, work is indispensable to meet human needs that go beyond survival. In this sense, the objective of this article is to present the social and economic context of the development of the capitalist system, from the main schools of economic thought: Mercantilism, Classical, Neoclassical, Keynesianism, and New Classical. For this, we resort to studies by Oliveira and Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); Andrade et al (2020); among others. Regarding the methodological path, we used narrative bibliographic research with a qualitative approach. With this, it was possible to affirm that the exploitation of human labor, the extraction of surplus-value, and the concentration of private property are ideas present in all schools of economic thought. In addition, the study of economic models also made it possible to understand economic interactions, allowing us to understand the relationship between supply and demand. Finally, the data obtained further corroborate the importance of the State in drafting laws that regulate the entire process of production and circulation of products and their insertion in the market.A lo largo de la historia de la humanidad, ha habido varias formas de organizaciones políticas y económicas que han influido directamente en el modo de producción del trabajo. Así, como producto de la organización social, el trabajo es indispensable para satisfacer necesidades humanas que van más allá de la supervivencia. En este sentido, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar el contexto social y económico del desarrollo del sistema capitalista, desde las principales escuelas de pensamiento económico: Mercantilismo, Clásico, Neoclásico, Keynesianismo y Nuevo Clásico. Para ello, recurrimos a estudios de, entre otros, Oliveira y Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); y Andrade et al (2020). En cuanto al recorrido metodológico, utilizamos la investigación bibliográfica narrativa con enfoque cualitativo. Con ello se pudo afirmar que la explotación del trabajo humano, la extracción de plusvalía y la concentración de la propiedad privada son ideas presentes en todas las escuelas de pensamiento económico. Además, el estudio de modelos económicos también permitió comprender las interacciones económicas, lo que permitió comprender la relación entre oferta y demanda. Finalmente, los datos obtenidos corroboran aún más la importancia del Estado en la elaboración de leyes que regulen todo el proceso de producción y circulación de productos y su inserción en el mercado.Ao longo da história da humanidade, houve diversas formas de organizações políticas e econômicas que influenciaram diretamente o modo de produção do trabalho. Assim, produto da organização social, o trabalho é indispensável para suprir as necessidades humanas que vão além da sobrevivência. Nesse sentido, o objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o contexto social e econômico do desenvolvimento do sistema capitalista, a partir das principais escolas de pensamento econômico: Mercantilismo, Clássica, Neoclássica, Keynesianismo e Novo-Clássica. Para isso, recorremos aos estudos de, entre outros, Oliveira e Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); e Andrade et al (2020). No tocante ao percurso metodológico, recorremos a pesquisa bibliográfica narrativa com abordagem qualitativa. Com isso, foi possível afirmar que a exploração da mão de obra humana, a extração da mais-valia e a concentração da propriedade privada são ideários presentes em todas as escolas do pensamento econômico. Além disso, o estudo dos modelos econômicos também possibilitou entender as interações econômicas, permitindo conhecer a relação entre oferta e demanda. Por fim, os dados obtidos corroboram ademais sobre a importância do Estado na elaboração de leis que regulamentam todo o processo de produção e circulação dos produtos e a inserção destes no mercado.Research, Society and Development2020-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/941710.33448/rsd-v9i10.9417Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e9729109417Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e9729109417Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e97291094172525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417/8425Copyright (c) 2020 Ana Paula Carneiro Dutra; Nara Nair Coelho da Silva; Paula Patrícia da Silva Rodrigues; Marcos Adriano Barbosa de Novaes; Késya Rodrigues Moreira; Antoniele Silvana de Melo Souza; Iara Saraiva Martins; Ana Kelly Batista Leão; Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de Paiva; Tatiany Santos Lima; Alex José de Sousa; Johnantan Santiago Moura; Amélia Soares Andréhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra, Ana Paula Carneiro Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de Moreira, Késya Rodrigues Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo Martins, Iara Saraiva Leão, Ana Kelly Batista Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de Lima, Tatiany Santos Sousa, Alex José de Moura, Johnantan Santiago André, Amélia Soares 2020-10-31T12:03:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9417Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:42.364824Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
Breves notas de las principales escuelas de pensamiento económico
Breves apontamentos das principais escolas de pensamento econômico
title Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
spellingShingle Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro
Mercantilism
Classical
Neoclassical
Keynesianism
New classical.
Mercantilismo
Clásico
Neoclásico
Keynesianismo
Nuevo clásico.
Mercantilismo
Clássica
Neoclássica
Keynesianismo
Novo clássica.
title_short Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
title_full Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
title_fullStr Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
title_full_unstemmed Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
title_sort Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
author Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro
author_facet Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro
Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da
Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva
Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de
Moreira, Késya Rodrigues
Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo
Martins, Iara Saraiva
Leão, Ana Kelly Batista
Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de
Lima, Tatiany Santos
Sousa, Alex José de
Moura, Johnantan Santiago
André, Amélia Soares
author_role author
author2 Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da
Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva
Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de
Moreira, Késya Rodrigues
Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo
Martins, Iara Saraiva
Leão, Ana Kelly Batista
Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de
Lima, Tatiany Santos
Sousa, Alex José de
Moura, Johnantan Santiago
André, Amélia Soares
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro
Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da
Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva
Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de
Moreira, Késya Rodrigues
Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo
Martins, Iara Saraiva
Leão, Ana Kelly Batista
Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de
Lima, Tatiany Santos
Sousa, Alex José de
Moura, Johnantan Santiago
André, Amélia Soares
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Mercantilism
Classical
Neoclassical
Keynesianism
New classical.
Mercantilismo
Clásico
Neoclásico
Keynesianismo
Nuevo clásico.
Mercantilismo
Clássica
Neoclássica
Keynesianismo
Novo clássica.
topic Mercantilism
Classical
Neoclassical
Keynesianism
New classical.
Mercantilismo
Clásico
Neoclásico
Keynesianismo
Nuevo clásico.
Mercantilismo
Clássica
Neoclássica
Keynesianismo
Novo clássica.
description Throughout the history of mankind, there have been several forms of political and economic organizations that have directly influenced the production work mode. Thus, as a product of the social organization, work is indispensable to meet human needs that go beyond survival. In this sense, the objective of this article is to present the social and economic context of the development of the capitalist system, from the main schools of economic thought: Mercantilism, Classical, Neoclassical, Keynesianism, and New Classical. For this, we resort to studies by Oliveira and Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); Andrade et al (2020); among others. Regarding the methodological path, we used narrative bibliographic research with a qualitative approach. With this, it was possible to affirm that the exploitation of human labor, the extraction of surplus-value, and the concentration of private property are ideas present in all schools of economic thought. In addition, the study of economic models also made it possible to understand economic interactions, allowing us to understand the relationship between supply and demand. Finally, the data obtained further corroborate the importance of the State in drafting laws that regulate the entire process of production and circulation of products and their insertion in the market.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-10-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417
10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9417
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9417
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417/8425
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e9729109417
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e9729109417
Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e9729109417
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052662099738624