Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417 |
Resumo: | Throughout the history of mankind, there have been several forms of political and economic organizations that have directly influenced the production work mode. Thus, as a product of the social organization, work is indispensable to meet human needs that go beyond survival. In this sense, the objective of this article is to present the social and economic context of the development of the capitalist system, from the main schools of economic thought: Mercantilism, Classical, Neoclassical, Keynesianism, and New Classical. For this, we resort to studies by Oliveira and Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); Andrade et al (2020); among others. Regarding the methodological path, we used narrative bibliographic research with a qualitative approach. With this, it was possible to affirm that the exploitation of human labor, the extraction of surplus-value, and the concentration of private property are ideas present in all schools of economic thought. In addition, the study of economic models also made it possible to understand economic interactions, allowing us to understand the relationship between supply and demand. Finally, the data obtained further corroborate the importance of the State in drafting laws that regulate the entire process of production and circulation of products and their insertion in the market. |
id |
UNIFEI_c031925b076fc9baec6cd7d2d1426506 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9417 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought Breves notas de las principales escuelas de pensamiento económicoBreves apontamentos das principais escolas de pensamento econômicoMercantilismClassicalNeoclassicalKeynesianismNew classical. MercantilismoClásicoNeoclásicoKeynesianismoNuevo clásico. MercantilismoClássicaNeoclássicaKeynesianismoNovo clássica.Throughout the history of mankind, there have been several forms of political and economic organizations that have directly influenced the production work mode. Thus, as a product of the social organization, work is indispensable to meet human needs that go beyond survival. In this sense, the objective of this article is to present the social and economic context of the development of the capitalist system, from the main schools of economic thought: Mercantilism, Classical, Neoclassical, Keynesianism, and New Classical. For this, we resort to studies by Oliveira and Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); Andrade et al (2020); among others. Regarding the methodological path, we used narrative bibliographic research with a qualitative approach. With this, it was possible to affirm that the exploitation of human labor, the extraction of surplus-value, and the concentration of private property are ideas present in all schools of economic thought. In addition, the study of economic models also made it possible to understand economic interactions, allowing us to understand the relationship between supply and demand. Finally, the data obtained further corroborate the importance of the State in drafting laws that regulate the entire process of production and circulation of products and their insertion in the market.A lo largo de la historia de la humanidad, ha habido varias formas de organizaciones políticas y económicas que han influido directamente en el modo de producción del trabajo. Así, como producto de la organización social, el trabajo es indispensable para satisfacer necesidades humanas que van más allá de la supervivencia. En este sentido, el objetivo de este artículo es presentar el contexto social y económico del desarrollo del sistema capitalista, desde las principales escuelas de pensamiento económico: Mercantilismo, Clásico, Neoclásico, Keynesianismo y Nuevo Clásico. Para ello, recurrimos a estudios de, entre otros, Oliveira y Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); y Andrade et al (2020). En cuanto al recorrido metodológico, utilizamos la investigación bibliográfica narrativa con enfoque cualitativo. Con ello se pudo afirmar que la explotación del trabajo humano, la extracción de plusvalía y la concentración de la propiedad privada son ideas presentes en todas las escuelas de pensamiento económico. Además, el estudio de modelos económicos también permitió comprender las interacciones económicas, lo que permitió comprender la relación entre oferta y demanda. Finalmente, los datos obtenidos corroboran aún más la importancia del Estado en la elaboración de leyes que regulen todo el proceso de producción y circulación de productos y su inserción en el mercado.Ao longo da história da humanidade, houve diversas formas de organizações políticas e econômicas que influenciaram diretamente o modo de produção do trabalho. Assim, produto da organização social, o trabalho é indispensável para suprir as necessidades humanas que vão além da sobrevivência. Nesse sentido, o objetivo deste artigo é apresentar o contexto social e econômico do desenvolvimento do sistema capitalista, a partir das principais escolas de pensamento econômico: Mercantilismo, Clássica, Neoclássica, Keynesianismo e Novo-Clássica. Para isso, recorremos aos estudos de, entre outros, Oliveira e Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); e Andrade et al (2020). No tocante ao percurso metodológico, recorremos a pesquisa bibliográfica narrativa com abordagem qualitativa. Com isso, foi possível afirmar que a exploração da mão de obra humana, a extração da mais-valia e a concentração da propriedade privada são ideários presentes em todas as escolas do pensamento econômico. Além disso, o estudo dos modelos econômicos também possibilitou entender as interações econômicas, permitindo conhecer a relação entre oferta e demanda. Por fim, os dados obtidos corroboram ademais sobre a importância do Estado na elaboração de leis que regulamentam todo o processo de produção e circulação dos produtos e a inserção destes no mercado.Research, Society and Development2020-10-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/941710.33448/rsd-v9i10.9417Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e9729109417Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e9729109417Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e97291094172525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417/8425Copyright (c) 2020 Ana Paula Carneiro Dutra; Nara Nair Coelho da Silva; Paula Patrícia da Silva Rodrigues; Marcos Adriano Barbosa de Novaes; Késya Rodrigues Moreira; Antoniele Silvana de Melo Souza; Iara Saraiva Martins; Ana Kelly Batista Leão; Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de Paiva; Tatiany Santos Lima; Alex José de Sousa; Johnantan Santiago Moura; Amélia Soares Andréhttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDutra, Ana Paula Carneiro Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de Moreira, Késya Rodrigues Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo Martins, Iara Saraiva Leão, Ana Kelly Batista Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de Lima, Tatiany Santos Sousa, Alex José de Moura, Johnantan Santiago André, Amélia Soares 2020-10-31T12:03:23Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/9417Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:31:42.364824Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought Breves notas de las principales escuelas de pensamiento económico Breves apontamentos das principais escolas de pensamento econômico |
title |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought |
spellingShingle |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro Mercantilism Classical Neoclassical Keynesianism New classical. Mercantilismo Clásico Neoclásico Keynesianismo Nuevo clásico. Mercantilismo Clássica Neoclássica Keynesianismo Novo clássica. |
title_short |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought |
title_full |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought |
title_fullStr |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought |
title_full_unstemmed |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought |
title_sort |
Brief notes from the main schools of economic thought |
author |
Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro |
author_facet |
Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de Moreira, Késya Rodrigues Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo Martins, Iara Saraiva Leão, Ana Kelly Batista Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de Lima, Tatiany Santos Sousa, Alex José de Moura, Johnantan Santiago André, Amélia Soares |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de Moreira, Késya Rodrigues Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo Martins, Iara Saraiva Leão, Ana Kelly Batista Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de Lima, Tatiany Santos Sousa, Alex José de Moura, Johnantan Santiago André, Amélia Soares |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Dutra, Ana Paula Carneiro Silva, Nara Nair Coelho da Rodrigues, Paula Patrícia da Silva Novaes, Marcos Adriano Barbosa de Moreira, Késya Rodrigues Souza, Antoniele Silvana de Melo Martins, Iara Saraiva Leão, Ana Kelly Batista Paiva, Cícero Ricardo Barbosa de Lima, Tatiany Santos Sousa, Alex José de Moura, Johnantan Santiago André, Amélia Soares |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Mercantilism Classical Neoclassical Keynesianism New classical. Mercantilismo Clásico Neoclásico Keynesianismo Nuevo clásico. Mercantilismo Clássica Neoclássica Keynesianismo Novo clássica. |
topic |
Mercantilism Classical Neoclassical Keynesianism New classical. Mercantilismo Clásico Neoclásico Keynesianismo Nuevo clásico. Mercantilismo Clássica Neoclássica Keynesianismo Novo clássica. |
description |
Throughout the history of mankind, there have been several forms of political and economic organizations that have directly influenced the production work mode. Thus, as a product of the social organization, work is indispensable to meet human needs that go beyond survival. In this sense, the objective of this article is to present the social and economic context of the development of the capitalist system, from the main schools of economic thought: Mercantilism, Classical, Neoclassical, Keynesianism, and New Classical. For this, we resort to studies by Oliveira and Gennari (2009); Canterbery (2001); Andrade et al (2020); among others. Regarding the methodological path, we used narrative bibliographic research with a qualitative approach. With this, it was possible to affirm that the exploitation of human labor, the extraction of surplus-value, and the concentration of private property are ideas present in all schools of economic thought. In addition, the study of economic models also made it possible to understand economic interactions, allowing us to understand the relationship between supply and demand. Finally, the data obtained further corroborate the importance of the State in drafting laws that regulate the entire process of production and circulation of products and their insertion in the market. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-10-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417 10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9417 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v9i10.9417 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/9417/8425 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 No. 10; e9729109417 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 9 Núm. 10; e9729109417 Research, Society and Development; v. 9 n. 10; e9729109417 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052662099738624 |