Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2024 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165 |
Resumo: | AFS provide important ecosystem services associated with carbon (C) cycling and dynamics and can store C in plant biomass that is often comparable to natural forests. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the biomass of fine roots (diameter ≤2mm) in different SAF modules (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) in the southeast of Pará, using two adjacent areas (Urochloa sp. pasture and secondary forest) as a reference. The modules have common crops (banana, manioc, pineapple, corn, cocoa), varying according to the other species intercropped. Each module has an area of 2 ha, the same history and time of implantation, and five 5×5 m plots were randomly installed in each one, where we collected 3 soil samples (0-10 cm) with a volumetric cylinder (196 cm³). In the laboratory, the roots were washed in running water under a 0.5 mm mesh and sorted using tweezers and a caliper. Root biomass was estimated using dry mass (g.m²) and statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA and Tukey's post-test. Forest and pasture showed greater fine root biomass compared to the SAF modules, which were similar to each other (p<0.001; Forest=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasture =359.25g.m²). In the forest, the high density and diversity of species can increase biomass. The similarity between the SAF modules indicates that the time of implementation (one year) is insufficient to influence root biomass differently, and that the history of the area and soil management influence root biomass, differentiating it from the forest analyzed. |
id |
UNIFEI_cb60f358a0b211399c41d0b5de629345 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45165 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern AmazonInfluencia de diferentes módulos de producción agroforestal sobre la biomasa de raíces finas en el sureste amazónicoInfluência de diferentes módulos de produção agroflorestal na biomassa de raízes finas no sudeste da AmazôniaCarbonoBiomasa radicularServicios ecosistémicos.CarbonRoot biomassEcosystem services.CarbonoBiomassa radicularServiços ecossistêmicos.AFS provide important ecosystem services associated with carbon (C) cycling and dynamics and can store C in plant biomass that is often comparable to natural forests. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the biomass of fine roots (diameter ≤2mm) in different SAF modules (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) in the southeast of Pará, using two adjacent areas (Urochloa sp. pasture and secondary forest) as a reference. The modules have common crops (banana, manioc, pineapple, corn, cocoa), varying according to the other species intercropped. Each module has an area of 2 ha, the same history and time of implantation, and five 5×5 m plots were randomly installed in each one, where we collected 3 soil samples (0-10 cm) with a volumetric cylinder (196 cm³). In the laboratory, the roots were washed in running water under a 0.5 mm mesh and sorted using tweezers and a caliper. Root biomass was estimated using dry mass (g.m²) and statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA and Tukey's post-test. Forest and pasture showed greater fine root biomass compared to the SAF modules, which were similar to each other (p<0.001; Forest=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasture =359.25g.m²). In the forest, the high density and diversity of species can increase biomass. The similarity between the SAF modules indicates that the time of implementation (one year) is insufficient to influence root biomass differently, and that the history of the area and soil management influence root biomass, differentiating it from the forest analyzed.Los SAF proporcionan importantes servicios ecosistémicos asociados con el ciclo y la dinámica del carbono (C), y pueden almacenar C en la biomasa vegetal que a menudo es comparable a la de los bosques naturales. El objetivo de este estudio fue cuantificar y comparar la biomasa de raíces finas (diámetro ≤2mm) en diferentes módulos de SAF (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) en el sudeste de Pará, tomando como referencia dos áreas adyacentes (pastizal de Urochloa sp. y bosque secundario). Los módulos tienen cultivos comunes (banana, mandioca, piña, maíz, cacao), variando de acuerdo con las otras especies intercaladas. Cada módulo tiene una superficie de 2 ha, la misma historia y época de implantación, y en cada uno se instalaron aleatoriamente cinco parcelas de 5×5 m, donde se recogieron 3 muestras de suelo (0-10 cm) con un cilindro volumétrico (196 cm³). En el laboratorio, las raíces se lavaron en agua corriente bajo una malla de 0,5 mm y se clasificaron utilizando pinzas y un calibre. La biomasa de las raíces se estimó mediante la masa seca (g.m²) y las comparaciones estadísticas se realizaron mediante ANOVA y postest de Tukey. El bosque y los pastos mostraron una mayor biomasa de raíces finas en comparación con los módulos SAF, que fueron similares entre sí (p<0,001; Bosque=283.95g.m²; M1=89,01g.m²; M2=65,89g.m²; M3=56,27g.m²; M4=115,96g.m²; M5=81,44g.m²; Pasto=359,25g.m²). En el bosque, la alta densidad y diversidad de especies puede aumentar la biomasa. La similitud entre los módulos SAF indica que el tiempo de implantación (un año) es insuficiente para influir de forma diferente en la biomasa radicular, y que la historia de la zona y la gestión del suelo influyen en la biomasa radicular, diferenciándola del bosque analizado.Os SAF promovem importantes serviços ecossistêmicos associados a ciclagem e dinâmica do carbono (C), podendo armazenar C na biomassa vegetal comparável, muitas vezes, às florestas naturais. Assim, este trabalho objetivou quantificar e comparar a biomassa de raízes finas (diâmetro ≤2mm) em diferentes módulos de SAF (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) no sudeste do Pará, tendo como referência duas áreas adjacentes (pastagem de Urochloa sp. e floresta secundária). Os módulos apresentam culturas comuns (banana, mandioca, abacaxi, milho, cacau), variando em função de outras espécies consorciadas. Cada módulo possui área de 2 ha, mesmo histórico e tempo de implantação, e em cada um foram instadas aleatoriamente cinco parcelas de 5×5 m, onde coletamos 3 amostras de solo (0-10 cm) com cilindro volumétrico (196 cm³). Em laboratório, as raízes foram lavadas em água corrente sob malha de 0,5 mm e triadas com uso de pinças e paquímetro. A biomassa radicular foi estimada por meio da massa seca (g.m²) e as comparações estatísticas feitas por ANOVA e o pós-teste de Tukey. Floresta e pastagem apresentaram maior biomassa de raízes finas comparada aos módulos de SAF, que foram semelhantes entre si (p<0.001; Floresta=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasto=359.25g.m²). Na floresta, a alta densidade e diversidade de espécies podem ter elevado a biomassa. A similaridade entre os módulos de SAF indica o tempo de implantação (um ano) como insuficiente para influenciar diferentemente a biomassa de raízes, ademais, o histórico da área e o manejo do solo influenciam a biomassa radicular, diferindo-a da floresta analisada.Research, Society and Development2024-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4516510.33448/rsd-v13i2.45165Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 2; e12813245165Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 2; e12813245165Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 2; e128132451652525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165/36019Copyright (c) 2024 Jéssica Araújo Heringer Ribeiro; Lígia Haira Duarte de Almeida; Thaís Gonzaga de Souza; Deirilane Galvão de Maraes; Felipi Lima dos Santos; Paulo Henrique Pereira de Souza; Fernando da Costa Brito Lacerdahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de Santos, Felipi Lima dos Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito 2024-03-04T09:47:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45165Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-03-04T09:47:20Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon Influencia de diferentes módulos de producción agroforestal sobre la biomasa de raíces finas en el sureste amazónico Influência de diferentes módulos de produção agroflorestal na biomassa de raízes finas no sudeste da Amazônia |
title |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon |
spellingShingle |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer Carbono Biomasa radicular Servicios ecosistémicos. Carbon Root biomass Ecosystem services. Carbono Biomassa radicular Serviços ecossistêmicos. |
title_short |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon |
title_full |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon |
title_fullStr |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon |
title_full_unstemmed |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon |
title_sort |
Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon |
author |
Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer |
author_facet |
Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de Santos, Felipi Lima dos Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de Santos, Felipi Lima dos Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de Santos, Felipi Lima dos Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Carbono Biomasa radicular Servicios ecosistémicos. Carbon Root biomass Ecosystem services. Carbono Biomassa radicular Serviços ecossistêmicos. |
topic |
Carbono Biomasa radicular Servicios ecosistémicos. Carbon Root biomass Ecosystem services. Carbono Biomassa radicular Serviços ecossistêmicos. |
description |
AFS provide important ecosystem services associated with carbon (C) cycling and dynamics and can store C in plant biomass that is often comparable to natural forests. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the biomass of fine roots (diameter ≤2mm) in different SAF modules (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) in the southeast of Pará, using two adjacent areas (Urochloa sp. pasture and secondary forest) as a reference. The modules have common crops (banana, manioc, pineapple, corn, cocoa), varying according to the other species intercropped. Each module has an area of 2 ha, the same history and time of implantation, and five 5×5 m plots were randomly installed in each one, where we collected 3 soil samples (0-10 cm) with a volumetric cylinder (196 cm³). In the laboratory, the roots were washed in running water under a 0.5 mm mesh and sorted using tweezers and a caliper. Root biomass was estimated using dry mass (g.m²) and statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA and Tukey's post-test. Forest and pasture showed greater fine root biomass compared to the SAF modules, which were similar to each other (p<0.001; Forest=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasture =359.25g.m²). In the forest, the high density and diversity of species can increase biomass. The similarity between the SAF modules indicates that the time of implementation (one year) is insufficient to influence root biomass differently, and that the history of the area and soil management influence root biomass, differentiating it from the forest analyzed. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-02-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165 10.33448/rsd-v13i2.45165 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v13i2.45165 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165/36019 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 2; e12813245165 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 2; e12813245165 Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 2; e12813245165 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052638791991296 |