Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer
Data de Publicação: 2024
Outros Autores: Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de, Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de, Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de, Santos, Felipi Lima dos, Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de, Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165
Resumo: AFS provide important ecosystem services associated with carbon (C) cycling and dynamics and can store C in plant biomass that is often comparable to natural forests. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the biomass of fine roots (diameter ≤2mm) in different SAF modules (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) in the southeast of Pará, using two adjacent areas (Urochloa sp. pasture and secondary forest) as a reference. The modules have common crops (banana, manioc, pineapple, corn, cocoa), varying according to the other species intercropped. Each module has an area of 2 ha, the same history and time of implantation, and five 5×5 m plots were randomly installed in each one, where we collected 3 soil samples (0-10 cm) with a volumetric cylinder (196 cm³). In the laboratory, the roots were washed in running water under a 0.5 mm mesh and sorted using tweezers and a caliper. Root biomass was estimated using dry mass (g.m²) and statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA and Tukey's post-test.  Forest and pasture showed greater fine root biomass compared to the SAF modules, which were similar to each other (p<0.001; Forest=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasture =359.25g.m²). In the forest, the high density and diversity of species can increase biomass. The similarity between the SAF modules indicates that the time of implementation (one year) is insufficient to influence root biomass differently, and that the history of the area and soil management influence root biomass, differentiating it from the forest analyzed.
id UNIFEI_cb60f358a0b211399c41d0b5de629345
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45165
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern AmazonInfluencia de diferentes módulos de producción agroforestal sobre la biomasa de raíces finas en el sureste amazónicoInfluência de diferentes módulos de produção agroflorestal na biomassa de raízes finas no sudeste da AmazôniaCarbonoBiomasa radicularServicios ecosistémicos.CarbonRoot biomassEcosystem services.CarbonoBiomassa radicularServiços ecossistêmicos.AFS provide important ecosystem services associated with carbon (C) cycling and dynamics and can store C in plant biomass that is often comparable to natural forests. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the biomass of fine roots (diameter ≤2mm) in different SAF modules (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) in the southeast of Pará, using two adjacent areas (Urochloa sp. pasture and secondary forest) as a reference. The modules have common crops (banana, manioc, pineapple, corn, cocoa), varying according to the other species intercropped. Each module has an area of 2 ha, the same history and time of implantation, and five 5×5 m plots were randomly installed in each one, where we collected 3 soil samples (0-10 cm) with a volumetric cylinder (196 cm³). In the laboratory, the roots were washed in running water under a 0.5 mm mesh and sorted using tweezers and a caliper. Root biomass was estimated using dry mass (g.m²) and statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA and Tukey's post-test.  Forest and pasture showed greater fine root biomass compared to the SAF modules, which were similar to each other (p<0.001; Forest=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasture =359.25g.m²). In the forest, the high density and diversity of species can increase biomass. The similarity between the SAF modules indicates that the time of implementation (one year) is insufficient to influence root biomass differently, and that the history of the area and soil management influence root biomass, differentiating it from the forest analyzed.Los SAF proporcionan importantes servicios ecosistémicos asociados con el ciclo y la dinámica del carbono (C), y pueden almacenar C en la biomasa vegetal que a menudo es comparable a la de los bosques naturales. El objetivo de este estudio fue cuantificar y comparar la biomasa de raíces finas (diámetro ≤2mm) en diferentes módulos de SAF (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) en el sudeste de Pará, tomando como referencia dos áreas adyacentes (pastizal de Urochloa sp. y bosque secundario). Los módulos tienen cultivos comunes (banana, mandioca, piña, maíz, cacao), variando de acuerdo con las otras especies intercaladas. Cada módulo tiene una superficie de 2 ha, la misma historia y época de implantación, y en cada uno se instalaron aleatoriamente cinco parcelas de 5×5 m, donde se recogieron 3 muestras de suelo (0-10 cm) con un cilindro volumétrico (196 cm³). En el laboratorio, las raíces se lavaron en agua corriente bajo una malla de 0,5 mm y se clasificaron utilizando pinzas y un calibre. La biomasa de las raíces se estimó mediante la masa seca (g.m²) y las comparaciones estadísticas se realizaron mediante ANOVA y postest de Tukey.  El bosque y los pastos mostraron una mayor biomasa de raíces finas en comparación con los módulos SAF, que fueron similares entre sí (p<0,001; Bosque=283.95g.m²; M1=89,01g.m²; M2=65,89g.m²; M3=56,27g.m²; M4=115,96g.m²; M5=81,44g.m²; Pasto=359,25g.m²). En el bosque, la alta densidad y diversidad de especies puede aumentar la biomasa. La similitud entre los módulos SAF indica que el tiempo de implantación (un año) es insuficiente para influir de forma diferente en la biomasa radicular, y que la historia de la zona y la gestión del suelo influyen en la biomasa radicular, diferenciándola del bosque analizado.Os SAF promovem importantes serviços ecossistêmicos associados a ciclagem e dinâmica do carbono (C), podendo armazenar C na biomassa vegetal comparável, muitas vezes, às florestas naturais. Assim, este trabalho objetivou quantificar e comparar a biomassa de raízes finas (diâmetro ≤2mm) em diferentes módulos de SAF (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) no sudeste do Pará, tendo como referência duas áreas adjacentes (pastagem de Urochloa sp. e floresta secundária). Os módulos apresentam culturas comuns (banana, mandioca, abacaxi, milho, cacau), variando em função de outras espécies consorciadas. Cada módulo possui área de 2 ha, mesmo histórico e tempo de implantação, e em cada um foram instadas aleatoriamente cinco parcelas de 5×5 m, onde coletamos 3 amostras de solo (0-10 cm) com cilindro volumétrico (196 cm³). Em laboratório, as raízes foram lavadas em água corrente sob malha de 0,5 mm e triadas com uso de pinças e paquímetro. A biomassa radicular foi estimada por meio da massa seca (g.m²) e as comparações estatísticas feitas por ANOVA e o pós-teste de Tukey.  Floresta e pastagem apresentaram maior biomassa de raízes finas comparada aos módulos de SAF, que foram semelhantes entre si (p<0.001; Floresta=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasto=359.25g.m²). Na floresta, a alta densidade e diversidade de espécies podem ter elevado a biomassa. A similaridade entre os módulos de SAF indica o tempo de implantação (um ano) como insuficiente para influenciar diferentemente a biomassa de raízes, ademais, o histórico da área e o manejo do solo influenciam a biomassa radicular, diferindo-a da floresta analisada.Research, Society and Development2024-02-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/4516510.33448/rsd-v13i2.45165Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 2; e12813245165Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 2; e12813245165Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 2; e128132451652525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165/36019Copyright (c) 2024 Jéssica Araújo Heringer Ribeiro; Lígia Haira Duarte de Almeida; Thaís Gonzaga de Souza; Deirilane Galvão de Maraes; Felipi Lima dos Santos; Paulo Henrique Pereira de Souza; Fernando da Costa Brito Lacerdahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRibeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de Santos, Felipi Lima dos Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito 2024-03-04T09:47:20Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/45165Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-03-04T09:47:20Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
Influencia de diferentes módulos de producción agroforestal sobre la biomasa de raíces finas en el sureste amazónico
Influência de diferentes módulos de produção agroflorestal na biomassa de raízes finas no sudeste da Amazônia
title Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
spellingShingle Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer
Carbono
Biomasa radicular
Servicios ecosistémicos.
Carbon
Root biomass
Ecosystem services.
Carbono
Biomassa radicular
Serviços ecossistêmicos.
title_short Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
title_full Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
title_fullStr Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
title_full_unstemmed Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
title_sort Influence of different agroforestry production modules on fine roots biomass in the southeastern Amazon
author Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer
author_facet Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer
Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de
Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de
Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de
Santos, Felipi Lima dos
Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de
Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito
author_role author
author2 Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de
Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de
Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de
Santos, Felipi Lima dos
Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de
Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ribeiro, Jéssica Araújo Heringer
Almeida, Lígia Haira Duarte de
Souza, Thaís Gonzaga de
Maraes, Deirilane Galvão de
Santos, Felipi Lima dos
Souza, Paulo Henrique Pereira de
Lacerda, Fernando da Costa Brito
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carbono
Biomasa radicular
Servicios ecosistémicos.
Carbon
Root biomass
Ecosystem services.
Carbono
Biomassa radicular
Serviços ecossistêmicos.
topic Carbono
Biomasa radicular
Servicios ecosistémicos.
Carbon
Root biomass
Ecosystem services.
Carbono
Biomassa radicular
Serviços ecossistêmicos.
description AFS provide important ecosystem services associated with carbon (C) cycling and dynamics and can store C in plant biomass that is often comparable to natural forests. The aim of this study was to quantify and compare the biomass of fine roots (diameter ≤2mm) in different SAF modules (M1, M2, M3, M4, M5) in the southeast of Pará, using two adjacent areas (Urochloa sp. pasture and secondary forest) as a reference. The modules have common crops (banana, manioc, pineapple, corn, cocoa), varying according to the other species intercropped. Each module has an area of 2 ha, the same history and time of implantation, and five 5×5 m plots were randomly installed in each one, where we collected 3 soil samples (0-10 cm) with a volumetric cylinder (196 cm³). In the laboratory, the roots were washed in running water under a 0.5 mm mesh and sorted using tweezers and a caliper. Root biomass was estimated using dry mass (g.m²) and statistical comparisons were made using ANOVA and Tukey's post-test.  Forest and pasture showed greater fine root biomass compared to the SAF modules, which were similar to each other (p<0.001; Forest=283.95g.m²; M1=89.01g.m²; M2=65.89g.m²; M3=56.27g.m²; M4=115.96g.m²; M5=81.44g.m²; Pasture =359.25g.m²). In the forest, the high density and diversity of species can increase biomass. The similarity between the SAF modules indicates that the time of implementation (one year) is insufficient to influence root biomass differently, and that the history of the area and soil management influence root biomass, differentiating it from the forest analyzed.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-02-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165
10.33448/rsd-v13i2.45165
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v13i2.45165
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/45165/36019
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 No. 2; e12813245165
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 13 Núm. 2; e12813245165
Research, Society and Development; v. 13 n. 2; e12813245165
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052638791991296