Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Research, Society and Development
Texto Completo: https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35198
Resumo: Introduction: The way in which Brazilian legislation came to light (mainly with the advent of the 1988 Constitution) shows us that individualism in the liberal-libertarian tradition has no place in our legal system. The exegesis of legal provisions and the decisions of the Courts over the decades proved that the principle of solidarity in private relations was definitely incorporated in Brazil. Objectives: To analyze the role of the State and, consequently, of Law, in the socioeconomic changes for this new post-modern and consolidation period. Thus exposing the way in which Brazilian legislation was written, in a so-called semi-open system, the power of the judge to interpret according to his best conviction will be studied. Methodology: Following the provisions of Mezzaroba and Monteiro, it will be studied from argumentative collisions, that the Law itself does not have the function of giving better predictability to business or serving a market logic. Again in opposition to the economic analysis of Law, the founding principles of the Law of Obligations will be used. Results and Conclusion: The current Civil Code broke with a technical-legal tradition that existed until then and has, recurrently, served the social purposes provided for in the Federal Constitution. Finally, starting from a brief historical evolution, it was seen that the Law has acted more actively than ever to consolidate the State budget in favor of a marketing bias. The three moments of the State were analyzed in terms of its budgetary guideline, according to the concepts of the German sociologist-economist Wolfgang Streeck
id UNIFEI_e2a9f4333a56acbd675fe446db1709d0
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35198
network_acronym_str UNIFEI
network_name_str Research, Society and Development
repository_id_str
spelling Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of LawLas Obligaciones en el Código Civil frente al Análisis Económica del DerechoAs Obrigações no Código Civil em oposição à Análise Econômica do DireitoObligacionesDerecho CivilEconomíaEstado ConsolidadoDemocracia.ObligationsCivil LawEconomyConsolidation StateDemocracyDemocracy.ObrigaçõesDireito CivilEconomiaEstado ConsolidadoDemocracia.Introduction: The way in which Brazilian legislation came to light (mainly with the advent of the 1988 Constitution) shows us that individualism in the liberal-libertarian tradition has no place in our legal system. The exegesis of legal provisions and the decisions of the Courts over the decades proved that the principle of solidarity in private relations was definitely incorporated in Brazil. Objectives: To analyze the role of the State and, consequently, of Law, in the socioeconomic changes for this new post-modern and consolidation period. Thus exposing the way in which Brazilian legislation was written, in a so-called semi-open system, the power of the judge to interpret according to his best conviction will be studied. Methodology: Following the provisions of Mezzaroba and Monteiro, it will be studied from argumentative collisions, that the Law itself does not have the function of giving better predictability to business or serving a market logic. Again in opposition to the economic analysis of Law, the founding principles of the Law of Obligations will be used. Results and Conclusion: The current Civil Code broke with a technical-legal tradition that existed until then and has, recurrently, served the social purposes provided for in the Federal Constitution. Finally, starting from a brief historical evolution, it was seen that the Law has acted more actively than ever to consolidate the State budget in favor of a marketing bias. The three moments of the State were analyzed in terms of its budgetary guideline, according to the concepts of the German sociologist-economist Wolfgang StreeckIntroducción: La forma en que la legislación brasileña salió a la luz (principalmente con el advenimiento de la Constitución de 1988) nos muestra que el individualismo en la tradición liberal-libertaria no tiene cabida en nuestro ordenamiento jurídico. La exégesis de las disposiciones legales y de las decisiones de los Tribunales a lo largo de las décadas demostró que el principio de la solidaridad en las relaciones privadas fue definitivamente incorporado en Brasil. Objetivos: Analizar el papel del Estado y, en consecuencia, del Derecho, en los cambios socioeconómicos para este nuevo período posmoderno y de consolidación. Exponiendo así la forma en que fue redactada la legislación brasileña, en un sistema denominado semiabierto, se estudiará la potestad del juez de interpretar según su mejor convicción. Metodología: Siguiendo las disposiciones de Mezzaroba y Monteiro, se estudiará a partir de colisiones argumentativas, que la Ley en sí misma no tiene la función de dar mejor previsibilidad a los negocios o atender una lógica de mercado. De nuevo en oposición al análisis económico del Derecho, se utilizarán los principios fundacionales del Derecho de las Obligaciones. Resultados y Conclusión: El Código Civil vigente rompió con una tradición técnico-jurídica existente hasta entonces y ha servido, recurrentemente, a los fines sociales previstos en la Constitución Federal. Finalmente, partiendo de una breve evolución histórica, se vio que la Ley ha actuado más activamente que nunca para consolidar el presupuesto del Estado a favor de un sesgo de marketing. Se analizaron los tres momentos del Estado en términos de su directriz presupuestaria, según los conceptos del sociólogo-economista alemán Wolfgang StreeckIntrodução: A maneira como as legislações brasileiras vieram à tona (principalmente com o advento da Constituição de 1988) nos mostra que o individualismo de tradição liberal-libertária não tem espaço em nosso ordenamento jurídico. A exegese dos dispositivos legais e as decisões dos Tribunais ao longo das décadas provaram que definitivamente se incorporou no Brasil o princípio da solidariedade nas relações privadas. Objetivos: Analisar o papel do Estado e, consequentemente, do Direito, nas mudanças socioeconômicas para este novo período pós-moderno e de consolidação. Expondo assim a maneira com que a legislação brasileira foi escrita, num sistema chamado de semiaberto, será estudado o poder ao julgador para interpretação conforme sua melhor convicção. Metodologia: Seguindo o disposto por Mezzaroba e Monteiro, será estudado a partir de colisões argumentativas, que o Direito em si não possui a função de dar melhor previsibilidade aos negócios ou de servir a uma lógica de mercado. Novamente em oposição à análise econômica do Direito, serão utilizados os princípios fundantes do Direito das Obrigações. Resultados e Conclusão: O Código Civil atual quebrou com uma tradição técnico-jurídica que existia até então e tem, recorrentemente, atendido aos fins sociais previstos na Constituição Federal. Por fim, partindo de uma breve evolução histórica, foi visto que o Direito tem atuado de forma mais ativa do que nunca para consolidar o orçamento do Estado em favor de um viés mercadológico. Foram analisados os três momentos do Estado quanto a sua diretriz orçamentária, segundo os conceitos do sociólogo-economista alemão Wolfgang Streeck.Research, Society and Development2022-09-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/3519810.33448/rsd-v11i13.35198Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 13; e104111335198Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 13; e104111335198Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 13; e1041113351982525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35198/29513Copyright (c) 2022 Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar Tonettohttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar 2022-10-17T13:43:46Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/35198Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:50:11.581629Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
Las Obligaciones en el Código Civil frente al Análisis Económica del Derecho
As Obrigações no Código Civil em oposição à Análise Econômica do Direito
title Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
spellingShingle Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar
Obligaciones
Derecho Civil
Economía
Estado Consolidado
Democracia.
Obligations
Civil Law
Economy
Consolidation State
Democracy
Democracy.
Obrigações
Direito Civil
Economia
Estado Consolidado
Democracia.
title_short Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
title_full Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
title_fullStr Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
title_full_unstemmed Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
title_sort Obligations in the Civil Code in opposition to the Economic Analysis of Law
author Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar
author_facet Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tonetto, Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Obligaciones
Derecho Civil
Economía
Estado Consolidado
Democracia.
Obligations
Civil Law
Economy
Consolidation State
Democracy
Democracy.
Obrigações
Direito Civil
Economia
Estado Consolidado
Democracia.
topic Obligaciones
Derecho Civil
Economía
Estado Consolidado
Democracia.
Obligations
Civil Law
Economy
Consolidation State
Democracy
Democracy.
Obrigações
Direito Civil
Economia
Estado Consolidado
Democracia.
description Introduction: The way in which Brazilian legislation came to light (mainly with the advent of the 1988 Constitution) shows us that individualism in the liberal-libertarian tradition has no place in our legal system. The exegesis of legal provisions and the decisions of the Courts over the decades proved that the principle of solidarity in private relations was definitely incorporated in Brazil. Objectives: To analyze the role of the State and, consequently, of Law, in the socioeconomic changes for this new post-modern and consolidation period. Thus exposing the way in which Brazilian legislation was written, in a so-called semi-open system, the power of the judge to interpret according to his best conviction will be studied. Methodology: Following the provisions of Mezzaroba and Monteiro, it will be studied from argumentative collisions, that the Law itself does not have the function of giving better predictability to business or serving a market logic. Again in opposition to the economic analysis of Law, the founding principles of the Law of Obligations will be used. Results and Conclusion: The current Civil Code broke with a technical-legal tradition that existed until then and has, recurrently, served the social purposes provided for in the Federal Constitution. Finally, starting from a brief historical evolution, it was seen that the Law has acted more actively than ever to consolidate the State budget in favor of a marketing bias. The three moments of the State were analyzed in terms of its budgetary guideline, according to the concepts of the German sociologist-economist Wolfgang Streeck
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-09-29
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35198
10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35198
url https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35198
identifier_str_mv 10.33448/rsd-v11i13.35198
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/35198/29513
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar Tonetto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Pedro Paulo Fernandes de Aguiar Tonetto
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 No. 13; e104111335198
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 11 Núm. 13; e104111335198
Research, Society and Development; v. 11 n. 13; e104111335198
2525-3409
reponame:Research, Society and Development
instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron:UNIFEI
instname_str Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
instacron_str UNIFEI
institution UNIFEI
reponame_str Research, Society and Development
collection Research, Society and Development
repository.name.fl_str_mv Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rsd.articles@gmail.com
_version_ 1797052724457504768

Registros relacionados