Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR)
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Research, Society and Development |
Texto Completo: | https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20104 |
Resumo: | Objective: Validate the content of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR). Methodology: Descriptive methodological study, of the content validation type using Pasquali ´s methodology, carried out with 14 professors from the health and pedagogy area, who evaluated the instrument´s items through an item-by-item classification using the Likert scale. The agreement between the judges was verified quantitatively through the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: Of the 53 items that make up the instrument, 39 items obtained agreement within the established level (CVI >0.78), while 14 did not obtain the necessary agreement level, with CVI values between 0.54 and 0.77. Thus, it was decided to reformulate the items that did not reach the necessary CVI. The final instrument had 55 items, as 02 items were subdivided, following the judges' recommendation. As for the general assessment of the instrument, it resulted in CVI=0.81, when performed through the sum of all CVI calculated separately, divided by the number of items considered in the assessment. Therefore, the instrument presented the minimum agreement for verifying the validity of a new instrument, which should not be less than 0.8. Conclusion: The AMEELS-BR, in general, was considered valid in terms of its content by the expert panel, presenting a validity index within acceptable parameters and thus being able to be used by managers and health professionals for the evaluation and elaboration of the MEI. |
id |
UNIFEI_f4685889038e67286db972b5037d05fc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20104 |
network_acronym_str |
UNIFEI |
network_name_str |
Research, Society and Development |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) Validación del Instrumento de Evaluación de Materiales Educativos Impresos con enfoque en Alfabetización en Salud para Brasil (AMEELS-BR)Validação do Instrumento de Avaliação de Materiais Educativos Impressos com foco no Letramento em Saúde para o Brasil (AMEELS-BR)Health educationValidation studyHealth literacy.Educación para la saludEstudio de validaciónAlfabetización en salud.Educação em saúdeEstudo de validaçãoLetramento em saúde.Objective: Validate the content of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR). Methodology: Descriptive methodological study, of the content validation type using Pasquali ´s methodology, carried out with 14 professors from the health and pedagogy area, who evaluated the instrument´s items through an item-by-item classification using the Likert scale. The agreement between the judges was verified quantitatively through the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: Of the 53 items that make up the instrument, 39 items obtained agreement within the established level (CVI >0.78), while 14 did not obtain the necessary agreement level, with CVI values between 0.54 and 0.77. Thus, it was decided to reformulate the items that did not reach the necessary CVI. The final instrument had 55 items, as 02 items were subdivided, following the judges' recommendation. As for the general assessment of the instrument, it resulted in CVI=0.81, when performed through the sum of all CVI calculated separately, divided by the number of items considered in the assessment. Therefore, the instrument presented the minimum agreement for verifying the validity of a new instrument, which should not be less than 0.8. Conclusion: The AMEELS-BR, in general, was considered valid in terms of its content by the expert panel, presenting a validity index within acceptable parameters and thus being able to be used by managers and health professionals for the evaluation and elaboration of the MEI.Objetivo: Validar el contenido del Instrumento de Evaluación de Material Educativo Impreso enfocado en Alfabetización en Salud para Brasil (AMEELS-BR). Metodología: Estudio metodológico descriptivo, tipo validación de contenido con la metodología Pasquali, realizado con 14 profesores de las áreas de salud y pedagogía, quienes evaluaron los ítems del instrumento mediante clasificación ítem por ítem mediante la escala Likert. La concordancia entre los jueces se verificó cuantitativamente a través del Índice de Validez de Contenido (IVC). Resultados: De los 53 ítems que componen el instrumento, 39 ítems obtuvieron concordancia dentro del nivel establecido (IVC> 0,78), mientras que 14 no obtuvieron el nivel de concordancia necesario, con valores de IVC entre 0,54 y 0,77. Así, se decidió reformular los ítems que no alcanzaron el IVC necesario. El instrumento final contó con 55 ítems, ya que se subdividieron 02 ítems, siguiendo la recomendación de los jueces. En cuanto a la evaluación general del instrumento, resultó en IVC = 0,81, cuando se realizó mediante la suma de todos los IVC calculados por separado, dividida por el número de ítems considerados en la evaluación. Por tanto, el instrumento presentó el acuerdo mínimo para verificar la validez de un nuevo instrumento, que no debe ser inferior a 0,8. Conclusión: El AMEELS-BR, en general, fue considerado válido en cuanto a su contenido por el panel de expertos, presentando un índice de validez dentro de parámetros aceptables y pudiendo así ser utilizado por gestores y profesionales de la salud para la evaluación y elaboración del MEI.Objetivo: Validar o conteúdo do Instrumento de Avaliação de Materiais Educativos Impressos com foco no Letramento em Saúde para o Brasil (AMEELS-BR). Metodologia: Estudo metodológico descritivo, do tipo validação de conteúdo com a metodologia de Pasquali, realizado com 14 docentes da área da saúde e da pedagogia, que avaliaram os itens do instrumento por meio de classificação item a item pela escala Likert. A concordância entre os juízes foi verificada de forma quantitativa por meio do Índice de Validade de Conteúdo (IVC). Resultados: Dos 53 itens que compõem o instrumento, 39 itens obtiveram concordância dentro do nível estabelecido (IVC >0,78), enquanto 14 não obtiveram o nível de concordância necessário, com valores de IVC entre 0,54 e 0,77. Dessa forma, optou-se por reformular os itens que não atingiram o IVC necessário. O instrumento final ficou com 55 itens, pois 02 itens foram subdivididos, acatando recomendação dos juízes. Quanto à avaliação geral do instrumento, resultou em IVC=0,81, quando realizado por meio da soma de todos os IVC calculados separadamente dividido pelo número de itens considerado na avaliação. Portanto, o instrumento apresentou a concordância mínima para a verificação da validade de um novo instrumento, que não deve ser inferior a 0,8. Conclusão: O AMEELS-BR, de forma geral, foi considerado válido quanto ao seu conteúdo pelo painel de especialistas, apresentando índice de validade dentro dos parâmetros aceitáveis e podendo assim ser utilizado por gestores e profissionais de saúde para a avaliação e elaboração dos MEI.Research, Society and Development2021-09-13info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/2010410.33448/rsd-v10i12.20104Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e68101220104Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e68101220104Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e681012201042525-3409reponame:Research, Society and Developmentinstname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)instacron:UNIFEIporhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20104/17981Copyright (c) 2021 Raquel Bezerra de Abreu; Antônio Augusto Ferreira Carioca; Helena Alves de Carvalho Sampaio; Cláudia Machado Coelho Souza de Vasconceloshttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessAbreu, Raquel Bezerra deCarioca, Antônio Augusto Ferreira Sampaio, Helena Alves de Carvalho Vasconcelos, Cláudia Machado Coelho Souza de 2021-11-14T20:26:51Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/20104Revistahttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/indexPUBhttps://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/oairsd.articles@gmail.com2525-34092525-3409opendoar:2024-01-17T09:39:50.763137Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) Validación del Instrumento de Evaluación de Materiales Educativos Impresos con enfoque en Alfabetización en Salud para Brasil (AMEELS-BR) Validação do Instrumento de Avaliação de Materiais Educativos Impressos com foco no Letramento em Saúde para o Brasil (AMEELS-BR) |
title |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) |
spellingShingle |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) Abreu, Raquel Bezerra de Health education Validation study Health literacy. Educación para la salud Estudio de validación Alfabetización en salud. Educação em saúde Estudo de validação Letramento em saúde. |
title_short |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) |
title_full |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) |
title_fullStr |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) |
title_full_unstemmed |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) |
title_sort |
Validation of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR) |
author |
Abreu, Raquel Bezerra de |
author_facet |
Abreu, Raquel Bezerra de Carioca, Antônio Augusto Ferreira Sampaio, Helena Alves de Carvalho Vasconcelos, Cláudia Machado Coelho Souza de |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Carioca, Antônio Augusto Ferreira Sampaio, Helena Alves de Carvalho Vasconcelos, Cláudia Machado Coelho Souza de |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Abreu, Raquel Bezerra de Carioca, Antônio Augusto Ferreira Sampaio, Helena Alves de Carvalho Vasconcelos, Cláudia Machado Coelho Souza de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health education Validation study Health literacy. Educación para la salud Estudio de validación Alfabetización en salud. Educação em saúde Estudo de validação Letramento em saúde. |
topic |
Health education Validation study Health literacy. Educación para la salud Estudio de validación Alfabetización en salud. Educação em saúde Estudo de validação Letramento em saúde. |
description |
Objective: Validate the content of the Instrument for the Evaluation of Printed Educational Materials with focus on Health Literacy for Brazil (AMEELS-BR). Methodology: Descriptive methodological study, of the content validation type using Pasquali ´s methodology, carried out with 14 professors from the health and pedagogy area, who evaluated the instrument´s items through an item-by-item classification using the Likert scale. The agreement between the judges was verified quantitatively through the Content Validity Index (CVI). Results: Of the 53 items that make up the instrument, 39 items obtained agreement within the established level (CVI >0.78), while 14 did not obtain the necessary agreement level, with CVI values between 0.54 and 0.77. Thus, it was decided to reformulate the items that did not reach the necessary CVI. The final instrument had 55 items, as 02 items were subdivided, following the judges' recommendation. As for the general assessment of the instrument, it resulted in CVI=0.81, when performed through the sum of all CVI calculated separately, divided by the number of items considered in the assessment. Therefore, the instrument presented the minimum agreement for verifying the validity of a new instrument, which should not be less than 0.8. Conclusion: The AMEELS-BR, in general, was considered valid in terms of its content by the expert panel, presenting a validity index within acceptable parameters and thus being able to be used by managers and health professionals for the evaluation and elaboration of the MEI. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-09-13 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20104 10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20104 |
url |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20104 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.33448/rsd-v10i12.20104 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://rsdjournal.org/index.php/rsd/article/view/20104/17981 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 No. 12; e68101220104 Research, Society and Development; Vol. 10 Núm. 12; e68101220104 Research, Society and Development; v. 10 n. 12; e68101220104 2525-3409 reponame:Research, Society and Development instname:Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) instacron:UNIFEI |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
instacron_str |
UNIFEI |
institution |
UNIFEI |
reponame_str |
Research, Society and Development |
collection |
Research, Society and Development |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Research, Society and Development - Universidade Federal de Itajubá (UNIFEI) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rsd.articles@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797052755233210368 |