THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2018 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista Thesis Juris |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/8993 |
Resumo: | The article focuses on the justificatory theories about international jus cogens, specifically the most known: the naturalist theory, the legal posivist theory, the international public order theory and other theories with a sociological aspect. We do not intend to propose a solution to the biggest problem of what would be the exact contours of jus cogens or its nomogenetic process – that is, the question of why would an ordinary norm of International Law achieve (or why would it deserve to achieve) the quality of a peremptory norm. We content ourselves with exposing the limits of each one of these foundations, with emphasis on the legal positivist theory. The proposal we try to advance is that these different perspectives would have much to gain if they communicated with each other. |
id |
UNINOVE-2_505102dc284af7fd43580c5a6b196e14 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/8993 |
network_acronym_str |
UNINOVE-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENSOS FUNDAMENTOS DO JUS COGENS INTERNACIONALJus cogens. Peremptory norms. International law theory.Jus cogens. Normas peremptórias. Teoria do direito internacional.The article focuses on the justificatory theories about international jus cogens, specifically the most known: the naturalist theory, the legal posivist theory, the international public order theory and other theories with a sociological aspect. We do not intend to propose a solution to the biggest problem of what would be the exact contours of jus cogens or its nomogenetic process – that is, the question of why would an ordinary norm of International Law achieve (or why would it deserve to achieve) the quality of a peremptory norm. We content ourselves with exposing the limits of each one of these foundations, with emphasis on the legal positivist theory. The proposal we try to advance is that these different perspectives would have much to gain if they communicated with each other.O artigo enfoca as teorias justificadoras do jus cogens internacional, especificamente as mais conhecidas internacional: a jusnaturalista, a juspositivista, a da ordem pública internacional e outras de aspecto sociológico. Não tencionamos propor solução para o problema maior de quais seriam os exatos contornos do direito cogente ou de seu processo nomogenético – isto é, a questão de por que uma norma ordinária de Direito Internacional seria alçada (ou mereceria ser alçada) à qualidade de norma peremptória. Contentamo-nos em expor as limitações de cada uma das fundamentações, com destaque para a juspositivista. A proposta por nós avançada é que essas diferentes óticas fundamentadoras muito teriam a ganhar se dialogassem entre si. Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove2018-04-27info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/899310.5585/rtj.v7i1.256Revista Thesis Juris; v. 7 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro/Junho; 242317-3580reponame:Revista Thesis Jurisinstname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)instacron:UNINOVEporhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/8993/3827Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Cerveira Cittadinoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCerveira Cittadino, Rodrigo2019-09-12T18:58:52Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uninove.br:article/8993Revistahttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjurisPRIhttps://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/oaithesis@uninove.br2317-35802317-3580opendoar:2019-09-12T18:58:52Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS OS FUNDAMENTOS DO JUS COGENS INTERNACIONAL |
title |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS |
spellingShingle |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS Cerveira Cittadino, Rodrigo Jus cogens. Peremptory norms. International law theory. Jus cogens. Normas peremptórias. Teoria do direito internacional. |
title_short |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS |
title_full |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS |
title_fullStr |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS |
title_full_unstemmed |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS |
title_sort |
THE FOUNDATIONS OF INTERNATIONAL JUS COGENS |
author |
Cerveira Cittadino, Rodrigo |
author_facet |
Cerveira Cittadino, Rodrigo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cerveira Cittadino, Rodrigo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Jus cogens. Peremptory norms. International law theory. Jus cogens. Normas peremptórias. Teoria do direito internacional. |
topic |
Jus cogens. Peremptory norms. International law theory. Jus cogens. Normas peremptórias. Teoria do direito internacional. |
description |
The article focuses on the justificatory theories about international jus cogens, specifically the most known: the naturalist theory, the legal posivist theory, the international public order theory and other theories with a sociological aspect. We do not intend to propose a solution to the biggest problem of what would be the exact contours of jus cogens or its nomogenetic process – that is, the question of why would an ordinary norm of International Law achieve (or why would it deserve to achieve) the quality of a peremptory norm. We content ourselves with exposing the limits of each one of these foundations, with emphasis on the legal positivist theory. The proposal we try to advance is that these different perspectives would have much to gain if they communicated with each other. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-04-27 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/8993 10.5585/rtj.v7i1.256 |
url |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/8993 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.5585/rtj.v7i1.256 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.uninove.br/thesisjuris/article/view/8993/3827 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Cerveira Cittadino info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2018 Rodrigo Cerveira Cittadino |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Nove de Julho - Uninove |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris; v. 7 n. 1 (2018): Janeiro/Junho; 24 2317-3580 reponame:Revista Thesis Juris instname:Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) instacron:UNINOVE |
instname_str |
Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
instacron_str |
UNINOVE |
institution |
UNINOVE |
reponame_str |
Revista Thesis Juris |
collection |
Revista Thesis Juris |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Thesis Juris - Universidade Nove de Julho (UNINOVE) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
thesis@uninove.br |
_version_ |
1800218168757583872 |