SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gonçalves, Francisco
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Aranha, Ágata
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/914
Resumo: The main objective of this study is to verify on what sort of evaluation the eighteen advisors of the physical education and sport’s of monographs in Portugal base their judgement when evaluating students. An anonymous and confidential questionnaire was used to verify how their evaluation is processed. Only 38,9% of the advisors explain to their advisees the criteria, parameters, types and objectives of the evaluation that are used in their evaluations. In relation to the formative evaluation, generally, the advisors, in every meeting, take their own conclusions in relation to future classifications, having to do constant feedbacks through a continuous evaluating system. Most of the advisors believe that they would be able to do a much better evaluation if they had more time to spend with their advisees. Finally, 66,7% of the supervisors believe that all the teaching courses should give higher value to the formation in the area of evaluation because it is important to know how to evaluate correctly, so as to be fairer with their students and to learn new evaluation strategies and instruments. The remaining advisors believe that there aren’t enough subjects that actually train the future teachers, in their formation, how to evaluate their students.
id UNISO-1_7596373f62b0aeafbcc21c74f45b1159
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/914
network_acronym_str UNISO-1
network_name_str Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSESThe main objective of this study is to verify on what sort of evaluation the eighteen advisors of the physical education and sport’s of monographs in Portugal base their judgement when evaluating students. An anonymous and confidential questionnaire was used to verify how their evaluation is processed. Only 38,9% of the advisors explain to their advisees the criteria, parameters, types and objectives of the evaluation that are used in their evaluations. In relation to the formative evaluation, generally, the advisors, in every meeting, take their own conclusions in relation to future classifications, having to do constant feedbacks through a continuous evaluating system. Most of the advisors believe that they would be able to do a much better evaluation if they had more time to spend with their advisees. Finally, 66,7% of the supervisors believe that all the teaching courses should give higher value to the formation in the area of evaluation because it is important to know how to evaluate correctly, so as to be fairer with their students and to learn new evaluation strategies and instruments. The remaining advisors believe that there aren’t enough subjects that actually train the future teachers, in their formation, how to evaluate their students.Unicamp; Uniso2011-11-20info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por Paresapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/914Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2011)Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 16 n. 3 (2011)1982-57651414-4077reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)instacron:UNISOporhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/914/912Copyright (c) 2014 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superiorinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGonçalves, FranciscoAranha, Ágata2018-06-06T20:12:14Zoai:ojs.periodicos.uniso.br:article/914Revistahttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/PUBhttps://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/oai||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br1982-57651414-4077opendoar:2018-06-06T20:12:14Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
title SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
spellingShingle SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
Gonçalves, Francisco
title_short SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
title_full SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
title_fullStr SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
title_full_unstemmed SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
title_sort SCIENCE EVALUATION METHODS IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION COURSES
author Gonçalves, Francisco
author_facet Gonçalves, Francisco
Aranha, Ágata
author_role author
author2 Aranha, Ágata
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gonçalves, Francisco
Aranha, Ágata
description The main objective of this study is to verify on what sort of evaluation the eighteen advisors of the physical education and sport’s of monographs in Portugal base their judgement when evaluating students. An anonymous and confidential questionnaire was used to verify how their evaluation is processed. Only 38,9% of the advisors explain to their advisees the criteria, parameters, types and objectives of the evaluation that are used in their evaluations. In relation to the formative evaluation, generally, the advisors, in every meeting, take their own conclusions in relation to future classifications, having to do constant feedbacks through a continuous evaluating system. Most of the advisors believe that they would be able to do a much better evaluation if they had more time to spend with their advisees. Finally, 66,7% of the supervisors believe that all the teaching courses should give higher value to the formation in the area of evaluation because it is important to know how to evaluate correctly, so as to be fairer with their students and to learn new evaluation strategies and instruments. The remaining advisors believe that there aren’t enough subjects that actually train the future teachers, in their formation, how to evaluate their students.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-11-20
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por Pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/914
url https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/914
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.uniso.br/avaliacao/article/view/914/912
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2014 Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unicamp; Uniso
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Unicamp; Uniso
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; Vol. 16 No. 3 (2011)
Avaliação: Revista da Avaliação da Educação Superior; v. 16 n. 3 (2011)
1982-5765
1414-4077
reponame:Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
instname:Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
instacron:UNISO
instname_str Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
instacron_str UNISO
institution UNISO
reponame_str Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
collection Avaliação (Campinas. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Avaliação (Campinas. Online) - Universidade de Sorocaba (UNISO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistaavaliacao@uniso.br
_version_ 1800219606937239552