Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bueno, Rodrigo
Data de Publicação: 2023
Outros Autores: de Saussure, Louis
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online)
Texto Completo: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/18111
Resumo: Wilson (2012; 2018; 2019 verbal presentation) has been conducting literature studies within the relevance theory program by exposing two conflicting conceptions. First is the notion held by relevance theory and its supporters that relevance can contribute to literary studies. The second conception is a counterpoint from literary theory by literary critic Keith Green (1996), that relevance has little to contribute to literary studies. We analyse both points of view, as asserted by Wilson and Green and we discuss the nature of linguistic communication theories and literary theories. We propose that, although they share the same observational object – literature – relevance theory and literary theory do not share the same theoretical object, so that the equivalence of both is a mistake. From such a mistake results a theoretical incommensurability problem and an imminent risk of pragmatics failing in its initiative to systematize literary phenomena.
id UNISUL-3_f495555513299ae71e9d3b0e2a9f0bfa
oai_identifier_str oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/18111
network_acronym_str UNISUL-3
network_name_str Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?Teoría de la relevancia y teoría de la literatura: ¿Deben (re)conciliarse las teorías científicas y críticas?Teoria da relevância e teoria da literatura: as teorias científicas e as teorias críticas devem ser (re)conciliadas?Relevance TheoryLiterary TheoryLiterary StudiesScientific TheoriesCritical TheoriesTeoría de la RelevanciaTeoría de la LiteraturaEstudios LiterariosTeorías CientíficasTeorías CríticasTeoria da RelevânciaTeoria da LiteraturaEstudos LiteráriosTeorias CientíficasTeorias CríticasWilson (2012; 2018; 2019 verbal presentation) has been conducting literature studies within the relevance theory program by exposing two conflicting conceptions. First is the notion held by relevance theory and its supporters that relevance can contribute to literary studies. The second conception is a counterpoint from literary theory by literary critic Keith Green (1996), that relevance has little to contribute to literary studies. We analyse both points of view, as asserted by Wilson and Green and we discuss the nature of linguistic communication theories and literary theories. We propose that, although they share the same observational object – literature – relevance theory and literary theory do not share the same theoretical object, so that the equivalence of both is a mistake. From such a mistake results a theoretical incommensurability problem and an imminent risk of pragmatics failing in its initiative to systematize literary phenomena.En el programa de relevancia, Wilson (2012; 2018; 2019) realizó el estudio literario exponiendo dos concepciones en conflicto. La primera concepción es que la relevancia contribuye al estudio de la literatura. La segunda concepción es un contrapunto defendido por el teórico literario Keith Green (1997), que la relevancia no contribuye al estudio literario. Analizamos ambos puntos de vista, tal como lo llevan a cabo Wilson y Green, y discutimos la naturaleza de las teorías del lenguaje y las teorías de la literatura. Proponemos que, aunque comparten el mismo objeto observacional, es decir, la literatura, la teoría de la relevancia y la teoría de la literatura no comparten el mismo objeto teórico, siendo la equivalencia de ambas un error. De tal error resulta un problema de inconmensurabilidad teórica y un riesgo inminente de fracaso de la pragmática en su iniciativa de sistematizar los fenómenos literarios.No programa da relevância, Wilson (2012; 2018; 2019) tem conduzido o estudo literário expondo duas conflitantes concepções. A primeira é a concepção dos teóricos relevantistas de que a relevância contribui para o estudo da literatura. A segunda concepção é um contraponto da teoria da literatura, especificada no nome do crítico literário Keith Green (1997), de que a relevância não contribui para o estudo literário. Analisamos ambos os pontos de vista, tais como protagonizados por Wilson e Green, e discutimos a natureza das teorias da linguagem e das teorias da literatura. Propomos que, embora compartilhem o mesmo objeto observacional, isto é, a literatura, a teoria da relevância e a teoria da literatura não compartilham o mesmo objeto teórico, sendo um equívoco a equivalência de ambas. De tal equívoco resulta um problema de incomensurabilidade teórica e um risco eminente de fracasso da pragmática em sua iniciativa de sistematização dos fenômenos literários.Silvânia Siebert2023-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionAvaliado por paresapplication/pdfhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/18111Linguagem em (Dis)curso; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2022): Language in (Dis)course; 365-383Linguagem em (Dis)curso; v. 22 n. 3 (2022): Linguagem em (Dis)curso; 365-3831982-4017reponame:Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online)instname:Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)instacron:UNISULporhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/18111/12361Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo Bueno, Louis de Saussureinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBueno, Rodrigode Saussure, Louis2023-04-01T14:54:13Zoai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/18111Revistahttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_DiscursoPRIhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/oai||lemd@unisul.br1982-40171518-7632opendoar:2023-04-01T14:54:13Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online) - Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
Teoría de la relevancia y teoría de la literatura: ¿Deben (re)conciliarse las teorías científicas y críticas?
Teoria da relevância e teoria da literatura: as teorias científicas e as teorias críticas devem ser (re)conciliadas?
title Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
spellingShingle Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
Bueno, Rodrigo
Relevance Theory
Literary Theory
Literary Studies
Scientific Theories
Critical Theories
Teoría de la Relevancia
Teoría de la Literatura
Estudios Literarios
Teorías Científicas
Teorías Críticas
Teoria da Relevância
Teoria da Literatura
Estudos Literários
Teorias Científicas
Teorias Críticas
title_short Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
title_full Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
title_fullStr Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
title_full_unstemmed Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
title_sort Relevance Theory and Literary Theory: Should Scientific and Critical Theories Be (Re)Conciliated?
author Bueno, Rodrigo
author_facet Bueno, Rodrigo
de Saussure, Louis
author_role author
author2 de Saussure, Louis
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bueno, Rodrigo
de Saussure, Louis
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Relevance Theory
Literary Theory
Literary Studies
Scientific Theories
Critical Theories
Teoría de la Relevancia
Teoría de la Literatura
Estudios Literarios
Teorías Científicas
Teorías Críticas
Teoria da Relevância
Teoria da Literatura
Estudos Literários
Teorias Científicas
Teorias Críticas
topic Relevance Theory
Literary Theory
Literary Studies
Scientific Theories
Critical Theories
Teoría de la Relevancia
Teoría de la Literatura
Estudios Literarios
Teorías Científicas
Teorías Críticas
Teoria da Relevância
Teoria da Literatura
Estudos Literários
Teorias Científicas
Teorias Críticas
description Wilson (2012; 2018; 2019 verbal presentation) has been conducting literature studies within the relevance theory program by exposing two conflicting conceptions. First is the notion held by relevance theory and its supporters that relevance can contribute to literary studies. The second conception is a counterpoint from literary theory by literary critic Keith Green (1996), that relevance has little to contribute to literary studies. We analyse both points of view, as asserted by Wilson and Green and we discuss the nature of linguistic communication theories and literary theories. We propose that, although they share the same observational object – literature – relevance theory and literary theory do not share the same theoretical object, so that the equivalence of both is a mistake. From such a mistake results a theoretical incommensurability problem and an imminent risk of pragmatics failing in its initiative to systematize literary phenomena.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Avaliado por pares
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/18111
url https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/18111
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Linguagem_Discurso/article/view/18111/12361
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo Bueno, Louis de Saussure
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2023 Rodrigo Bueno, Louis de Saussure
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Silvânia Siebert
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Silvânia Siebert
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Linguagem em (Dis)curso; Vol. 22 No. 3 (2022): Language in (Dis)course; 365-383
Linguagem em (Dis)curso; v. 22 n. 3 (2022): Linguagem em (Dis)curso; 365-383
1982-4017
reponame:Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online)
instname:Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)
instacron:UNISUL
instname_str Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)
instacron_str UNISUL
institution UNISUL
reponame_str Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online)
collection Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Linguagem em (Dis)curso (Online) - Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||lemd@unisul.br
_version_ 1800220575985041408