The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lima Amorim, Wellington
Data de Publicação: 2011
Outros Autores: Gacki, Sérgio Ricardo
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Poiésis (Tubarão. Online)
Texto Completo: https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Poiesis/article/view/641
Resumo: This paper intend to demonstrate the apparent contradiction of Hegelian thought. Hegel's attempt is to unite with the substance of Spinoza and whit the “I free” of Kant, in other words, necessity and contingency. As we know this project is unfinished, and a modal operator, ie, a “must be” cosmic being weaker than the “must be” Kantian permeating the whole system, does not resolve this question.To reflect about this problematic leads us to the concept of ethical dialogue in Gadamer and you can take us toward an intersubjective ethical structure. Therefore, one must postulate such question “ab initio’ to justify the way of this argument, recognizing that this dimension of the human meeting, advocates the dialogue as a hermeneutical core of this ethical structure. In Gadamer there is an invitation to a recognition of what is at stake: the dialogue. On the horizon of hermeneutic perspective, the dialogue is in a praxis, a fundamentally ethical stance.
id UNISUL-4_f2748db6b63a90cde2dfc4689994288f
oai_identifier_str oai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/641
network_acronym_str UNISUL-4
network_name_str Poiésis (Tubarão. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogueDa ética do dever-ser a ética do diálogoHermeneuticsEthicsMust-beHermenêuticaÉticaDever-serThis paper intend to demonstrate the apparent contradiction of Hegelian thought. Hegel's attempt is to unite with the substance of Spinoza and whit the “I free” of Kant, in other words, necessity and contingency. As we know this project is unfinished, and a modal operator, ie, a “must be” cosmic being weaker than the “must be” Kantian permeating the whole system, does not resolve this question.To reflect about this problematic leads us to the concept of ethical dialogue in Gadamer and you can take us toward an intersubjective ethical structure. Therefore, one must postulate such question “ab initio’ to justify the way of this argument, recognizing that this dimension of the human meeting, advocates the dialogue as a hermeneutical core of this ethical structure. In Gadamer there is an invitation to a recognition of what is at stake: the dialogue. On the horizon of hermeneutic perspective, the dialogue is in a praxis, a fundamentally ethical stance.Este artigo tem o objetivo de demonstrar a aparente contradição do pensamento hegeliano. A tentativa de Hegel é unir a substância de Espinosa com o “Eu” de Kant, ou seja, necessidade e contingência. Como sabemos este projeto é inacabado, e um operador modal, ou seja, um dever-ser cósmico mais fraco que o dever-ser kantiano perpassando todo o sistema, não resolve esta questão. Refletir sobre esta problemática nos conduz ao conceito de ética do diálogo em Gadamer sendo possível nos levar em direção a uma estrutura ética intersubjetiva. Portanto, deve-se postular tal questão "ab initio” para justificar o caminho da presente argumentação, que ao reconhecer essa dimensão de encontro do humano, defende o diálogo hermenêutico como cerne dessa estrutura ética. Em Gadamer existe um convite para um reconhecimento do que esta em jogo: o diálogo. No horizonte da perspectiva hermenêutica, o diálogo constitui-se em uma práxis, uma postura fundamentalmente ética.Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina2011-06-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionArtigo Solicitadoapplication/pdfhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Poiesis/article/view/64110.19177/prppge.v4e7201165-78Poiésis - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação; v. 4 n. 7 (2011); 65-782179-2534reponame:Poiésis (Tubarão. Online)instname:Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)instacron:UNISULporhttps://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Poiesis/article/view/641/599Lima Amorim, WellingtonGacki, Sérgio Ricardoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2016-07-18T12:55:35Zoai:portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br:article/641Revistahttp://www.portaldeperiodicos.unisul.br/index.php/PoiesisPRIhttp://www.portaldeperiodicos.unisul.br/index.php/Poiesis/oai||revistapoiesis@unisul.br2179-25342179-2534opendoar:2016-07-18T12:55:35Poiésis (Tubarão. Online) - Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
Da ética do dever-ser a ética do diálogo
title The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
spellingShingle The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
Lima Amorim, Wellington
Hermeneutics
Ethics
Must-be
Hermenêutica
Ética
Dever-ser
title_short The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
title_full The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
title_fullStr The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
title_full_unstemmed The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
title_sort The ethics of must be toward ethics of dialogue
author Lima Amorim, Wellington
author_facet Lima Amorim, Wellington
Gacki, Sérgio Ricardo
author_role author
author2 Gacki, Sérgio Ricardo
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima Amorim, Wellington
Gacki, Sérgio Ricardo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Hermeneutics
Ethics
Must-be
Hermenêutica
Ética
Dever-ser
topic Hermeneutics
Ethics
Must-be
Hermenêutica
Ética
Dever-ser
description This paper intend to demonstrate the apparent contradiction of Hegelian thought. Hegel's attempt is to unite with the substance of Spinoza and whit the “I free” of Kant, in other words, necessity and contingency. As we know this project is unfinished, and a modal operator, ie, a “must be” cosmic being weaker than the “must be” Kantian permeating the whole system, does not resolve this question.To reflect about this problematic leads us to the concept of ethical dialogue in Gadamer and you can take us toward an intersubjective ethical structure. Therefore, one must postulate such question “ab initio’ to justify the way of this argument, recognizing that this dimension of the human meeting, advocates the dialogue as a hermeneutical core of this ethical structure. In Gadamer there is an invitation to a recognition of what is at stake: the dialogue. On the horizon of hermeneutic perspective, the dialogue is in a praxis, a fundamentally ethical stance.
publishDate 2011
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2011-06-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
Artigo Solicitado
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Poiesis/article/view/641
10.19177/prppge.v4e7201165-78
url https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Poiesis/article/view/641
identifier_str_mv 10.19177/prppge.v4e7201165-78
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://portaldeperiodicos.animaeducacao.com.br/index.php/Poiesis/article/view/641/599
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Poiésis - Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Educação; v. 4 n. 7 (2011); 65-78
2179-2534
reponame:Poiésis (Tubarão. Online)
instname:Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)
instacron:UNISUL
instname_str Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)
instacron_str UNISUL
institution UNISUL
reponame_str Poiésis (Tubarão. Online)
collection Poiésis (Tubarão. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Poiésis (Tubarão. Online) - Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revistapoiesis@unisul.br
_version_ 1800218746546028544