Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Rafael [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Flávio A. S. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40313-021-00756-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221839
Resumo: Impedance network inverters (INIs) have emerged as an alternative to improve traditional inverters, allowing their operation as a buck-boost-type converter, through the utilization of the “shoot-through” conduction state, where switches of one or more inverter legs are gated on simultaneously. Recently introduced, the quasi-Y-source inverter (QYSI) is a INI with magnetic coupling, which has particular operational advantages, specially for renewable sources and distributed generation. To control the QYSI, there are several techniques based on sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM), which are modified to allow the shoot-through state. This work aims to present, through theoretical, simulations and experimental results, a comparative analysis of three SPWM techniques applied in three-phase QYSI, considering a fixed inverter gain factor and a three-phase/three-wire wye-connected R load to the inverter output after a LC filter. The following modulation techniques were compared: simple boost control (SBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC3h) and maximum constant boost control with third harmonic injection (MCBC3h). A comparative analysis was performed showing several relationships among voltage gain, switch voltage stress, shoot-through duty ratio and converter design, for the different SPWM techniques. It is shown the advantages and disadvantages of each SPWM technique applied to QYSI, and merit indexes are indicated in order to help to establish proper criteria for choosing among SPWM techniques for three-phase/three-wire power system applications.
id UNSP_11bf0b750ab79208a467aa9464ddc721
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221839
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source InverterDistributed generationImpedance networksInverterQuasi-Y-sourceSPWMImpedance network inverters (INIs) have emerged as an alternative to improve traditional inverters, allowing their operation as a buck-boost-type converter, through the utilization of the “shoot-through” conduction state, where switches of one or more inverter legs are gated on simultaneously. Recently introduced, the quasi-Y-source inverter (QYSI) is a INI with magnetic coupling, which has particular operational advantages, specially for renewable sources and distributed generation. To control the QYSI, there are several techniques based on sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM), which are modified to allow the shoot-through state. This work aims to present, through theoretical, simulations and experimental results, a comparative analysis of three SPWM techniques applied in three-phase QYSI, considering a fixed inverter gain factor and a three-phase/three-wire wye-connected R load to the inverter output after a LC filter. The following modulation techniques were compared: simple boost control (SBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC3h) and maximum constant boost control with third harmonic injection (MCBC3h). A comparative analysis was performed showing several relationships among voltage gain, switch voltage stress, shoot-through duty ratio and converter design, for the different SPWM techniques. It is shown the advantages and disadvantages of each SPWM technique applied to QYSI, and merit indexes are indicated in order to help to establish proper criteria for choosing among SPWM techniques for three-phase/three-wire power system applications.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)São Paulo State University (UNESP)São Paulo State University (UNESP)FAPESP: #2016/08645-9FAPESP: #2018/243310CNPq: #313710/2019-8Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Santos, Rafael [UNESP]Gonçalves, Flávio A. S. [UNESP]2022-04-28T19:40:54Z2022-04-28T19:40:54Z2021-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1399-1407http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40313-021-00756-3Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, v. 32, n. 5, p. 1399-1407, 2021.2195-38992195-3880http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22183910.1007/s40313-021-00756-32-s2.0-85108669420Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systemsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:40:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/221839Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:43:31.628968Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
title Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
spellingShingle Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
Santos, Rafael [UNESP]
Distributed generation
Impedance networks
Inverter
Quasi-Y-source
SPWM
title_short Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
title_full Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
title_fullStr Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
title_full_unstemmed Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
title_sort Sinusoidal PWM Techniques Comparison for the Quasi-Y-Source Inverter
author Santos, Rafael [UNESP]
author_facet Santos, Rafael [UNESP]
Gonçalves, Flávio A. S. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Flávio A. S. [UNESP]
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Rafael [UNESP]
Gonçalves, Flávio A. S. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Distributed generation
Impedance networks
Inverter
Quasi-Y-source
SPWM
topic Distributed generation
Impedance networks
Inverter
Quasi-Y-source
SPWM
description Impedance network inverters (INIs) have emerged as an alternative to improve traditional inverters, allowing their operation as a buck-boost-type converter, through the utilization of the “shoot-through” conduction state, where switches of one or more inverter legs are gated on simultaneously. Recently introduced, the quasi-Y-source inverter (QYSI) is a INI with magnetic coupling, which has particular operational advantages, specially for renewable sources and distributed generation. To control the QYSI, there are several techniques based on sinusoidal pulse width modulation (SPWM), which are modified to allow the shoot-through state. This work aims to present, through theoretical, simulations and experimental results, a comparative analysis of three SPWM techniques applied in three-phase QYSI, considering a fixed inverter gain factor and a three-phase/three-wire wye-connected R load to the inverter output after a LC filter. The following modulation techniques were compared: simple boost control (SBC), maximum boost control with third harmonic injection (MBC3h) and maximum constant boost control with third harmonic injection (MCBC3h). A comparative analysis was performed showing several relationships among voltage gain, switch voltage stress, shoot-through duty ratio and converter design, for the different SPWM techniques. It is shown the advantages and disadvantages of each SPWM technique applied to QYSI, and merit indexes are indicated in order to help to establish proper criteria for choosing among SPWM techniques for three-phase/three-wire power system applications.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-01
2022-04-28T19:40:54Z
2022-04-28T19:40:54Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40313-021-00756-3
Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, v. 32, n. 5, p. 1399-1407, 2021.
2195-3899
2195-3880
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221839
10.1007/s40313-021-00756-3
2-s2.0-85108669420
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40313-021-00756-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/221839
identifier_str_mv Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems, v. 32, n. 5, p. 1399-1407, 2021.
2195-3899
2195-3880
10.1007/s40313-021-00756-3
2-s2.0-85108669420
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Control, Automation and Electrical Systems
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1399-1407
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129350730514432