Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Malta, Deborah Carvalho, Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira [UNESP], Bracco, Mário M, Florindo, Alex Antonio, Mielke, Gregore Iven, Parra, Diana C, Lobelo, Felipe, Simoes, Eduardo J, Hallal, Pedro Curi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/114109
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: Assessment of prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units within Brazil’s health system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study based on telephone interviews with managers of primary care units. Of a total 42,486 primary health care units listed in the Brazilian Unified Health System directory, 1,600 were randomly selected. Care units from all five Brazilian macroregions were selected proportionally to the number of units in each region. We examined whether any of the following five different types of health promotion programs was available: physical activity; smoking cessation; cessation of alcohol and illicit drug use; healthy eating; and healthy environment. Information was collected on the kinds of activities offered and the status of implementation of the Family Health Strategy at the units. RESULTS: Most units (62.0%) reported having in place three health promotion programs or more and only 3.0% reported having none. Healthy environment (77.0%) and healthy eating (72.0%) programs were the most widely available; smoking and alcohol use cessation were reported in 54.0% and 42.0% of the units. Physical activity programs were offered in less than 40.0% of the units and their availability varied greatly nationwide, from 51.0% in the Southeast to as low as 21.0% in the North. The Family Health Strategy was implemented in most units (61.0%); however, they did not offer more health promotion programs than others did. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that most primary care units have in place health promotion programs. Public policies are needed to strengthen primary care services and improve training of health providers to meet the goals of the agenda for health promotion in Brazil.
id UNSP_1ad5d8745fd4ddfb17f28c8ca5357763
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/114109
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in BrazilPrevalência de programas de promoção da saúde em unidades básicas de saúde no BrasilPlanos e Programas de SaúdeCentros de SaúdePromoção da SaúdeAtenção Primária à SaúdeInquéritos EpidemiológicosHealth Programs and PlansHealth CentersHealth PromotionPrimary Health CareHealth SurveysOBJECTIVE: Assessment of prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units within Brazil’s health system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study based on telephone interviews with managers of primary care units. Of a total 42,486 primary health care units listed in the Brazilian Unified Health System directory, 1,600 were randomly selected. Care units from all five Brazilian macroregions were selected proportionally to the number of units in each region. We examined whether any of the following five different types of health promotion programs was available: physical activity; smoking cessation; cessation of alcohol and illicit drug use; healthy eating; and healthy environment. Information was collected on the kinds of activities offered and the status of implementation of the Family Health Strategy at the units. RESULTS: Most units (62.0%) reported having in place three health promotion programs or more and only 3.0% reported having none. Healthy environment (77.0%) and healthy eating (72.0%) programs were the most widely available; smoking and alcohol use cessation were reported in 54.0% and 42.0% of the units. Physical activity programs were offered in less than 40.0% of the units and their availability varied greatly nationwide, from 51.0% in the Southeast to as low as 21.0% in the North. The Family Health Strategy was implemented in most units (61.0%); however, they did not offer more health promotion programs than others did. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that most primary care units have in place health promotion programs. Public policies are needed to strengthen primary care services and improve training of health providers to meet the goals of the agenda for health promotion in Brazil.OBJETIVO: Estimar a prevalência de programas de promoção da saúde nas unidades básicas de saúde no Brasil. MÉTODOS: Estudo transversal descritivo realizado por meio de entrevistas telefônicas com coordenadores de unidades básicas de saúde. Do total de 42.486 unidades básicas de saúde cadastradas pelo Ministério da Saúde, 1.600 foram aleatoriamente selecionadas. As unidades foram amostradas nas cinco regiões do País de acordo com a proporção de unidades em cada região. Foi analisada a presença ou não de cinco programas de promoção da saúde: promoção de atividade física, cessação de tabagismo, cessação de uso de álcool e drogas ilícitas, alimentação saudável e ambiente saudável. Foram coletados dados sobre o tipo de ações desenvolvidas nos programas e a presença ou não da Estratégia de Saúde da Família na unidade. RESULTADOS: A maioria das unidades básicas de saúde (62,0%) referiu ter pelo menos três programas de promoção da saúde e apenas 3,0% não tinha nenhum. A promoção do ambiente saudável e da alimentação saudável foram os programas mais prevalentes (77,0% e 72,0%, respectivamente), enquanto o controle do tabaco e do álcool foram referidos em 54,0% e 42,0% das unidades de saúde, respectivamente. A promoção de atividade física foi referida em menos de 40,0% das unidades e teve grande variação regional, com prevalência de 51,0% nas unidades do Sudeste e apenas 21,0% nas do Norte. A maioria das unidades de saúde (61,0%) oferecia Estratégia de Saúde da Família, porém não foi verificada maior prevalência de programas de promoção da saúde nessas unidades em relação às outras. CONCLUSÕES: Este estudo mostrou que programas de promoção da saúde estão presentes na maioria das unidades básicas de saúde. Políticas públicas devem fortalecer a infraestrutura das unidades básicas de saúde e melhorar a capacitação dos trabalhadores de saúde para executar adequadamente a agenda de promoção de saúde do governo brasileiro.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Universidade Federal de São Paulo Departamento de Medicina PreventivaMinistério da Saúde Secretaria de Vigilância EpidemiológicaUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo Núcleo de Atividade Física, Esporte e SaúdeHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinUniversidade de São Paulo Escola de Artes, Ciências e HumanidadesUniversidade Federal de PelotasWashington University in St. Louis George Warren Brown School of Social Work Prevention Research Center in St. LouisCenters For Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Diabetes TranslationUniversity of Missouri School of Medicine Department of Health Management and InformaticsUniversidade Federal de Pelotas Faculdade de Educação FísicaFaculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São PauloUniversidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Ministério da Saúde Secretaria de Vigilância EpidemiológicaUniversidade Estadual de São Paulo Núcleo de Atividade Física, Esporte e SaúdeHospital Israelita Albert EinsteinUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)Washington University in St. Louis George Warren Brown School of Social Work Prevention Research Center in St. LouisCenters For Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Diabetes TranslationUniversity of Missouri School of Medicine Department of Health Management and InformaticsUniversidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)Ramos, Luiz RobertoMalta, Deborah CarvalhoGomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira [UNESP]Bracco, Mário MFlorindo, Alex AntonioMielke, Gregore IvenParra, Diana CLobelo, FelipeSimoes, Eduardo JHallal, Pedro Curi2015-02-02T12:39:13Z2015-02-02T12:39:13Z2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article837-844application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249Revista de Saúde Pública. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, v. 48, n. 5, p. 837-844, 2014.0034-8910http://hdl.handle.net/11449/11410910.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249S0034-89102014000500837S0034-89102014000500837.pdfSciELOreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengRevista de Saúde Pública1.9110,807info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-01-14T06:22:31Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/114109Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:56:50.556799Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
Prevalência de programas de promoção da saúde em unidades básicas de saúde no Brasil
title Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
spellingShingle Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Planos e Programas de Saúde
Centros de Saúde
Promoção da Saúde
Atenção Primária à Saúde
Inquéritos Epidemiológicos
Health Programs and Plans
Health Centers
Health Promotion
Primary Health Care
Health Surveys
title_short Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_full Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_fullStr Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_sort Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
author Ramos, Luiz Roberto
author_facet Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Malta, Deborah Carvalho
Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira [UNESP]
Bracco, Mário M
Florindo, Alex Antonio
Mielke, Gregore Iven
Parra, Diana C
Lobelo, Felipe
Simoes, Eduardo J
Hallal, Pedro Curi
author_role author
author2 Malta, Deborah Carvalho
Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira [UNESP]
Bracco, Mário M
Florindo, Alex Antonio
Mielke, Gregore Iven
Parra, Diana C
Lobelo, Felipe
Simoes, Eduardo J
Hallal, Pedro Curi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
Ministério da Saúde Secretaria de Vigilância Epidemiológica
Universidade Estadual de São Paulo Núcleo de Atividade Física, Esporte e Saúde
Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
Washington University in St. Louis George Warren Brown School of Social Work Prevention Research Center in St. Louis
Centers For Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion Division of Diabetes Translation
University of Missouri School of Medicine Department of Health Management and Informatics
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (UFPEL)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Malta, Deborah Carvalho
Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira [UNESP]
Bracco, Mário M
Florindo, Alex Antonio
Mielke, Gregore Iven
Parra, Diana C
Lobelo, Felipe
Simoes, Eduardo J
Hallal, Pedro Curi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Planos e Programas de Saúde
Centros de Saúde
Promoção da Saúde
Atenção Primária à Saúde
Inquéritos Epidemiológicos
Health Programs and Plans
Health Centers
Health Promotion
Primary Health Care
Health Surveys
topic Planos e Programas de Saúde
Centros de Saúde
Promoção da Saúde
Atenção Primária à Saúde
Inquéritos Epidemiológicos
Health Programs and Plans
Health Centers
Health Promotion
Primary Health Care
Health Surveys
description OBJECTIVE: Assessment of prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units within Brazil’s health system. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study based on telephone interviews with managers of primary care units. Of a total 42,486 primary health care units listed in the Brazilian Unified Health System directory, 1,600 were randomly selected. Care units from all five Brazilian macroregions were selected proportionally to the number of units in each region. We examined whether any of the following five different types of health promotion programs was available: physical activity; smoking cessation; cessation of alcohol and illicit drug use; healthy eating; and healthy environment. Information was collected on the kinds of activities offered and the status of implementation of the Family Health Strategy at the units. RESULTS: Most units (62.0%) reported having in place three health promotion programs or more and only 3.0% reported having none. Healthy environment (77.0%) and healthy eating (72.0%) programs were the most widely available; smoking and alcohol use cessation were reported in 54.0% and 42.0% of the units. Physical activity programs were offered in less than 40.0% of the units and their availability varied greatly nationwide, from 51.0% in the Southeast to as low as 21.0% in the North. The Family Health Strategy was implemented in most units (61.0%); however, they did not offer more health promotion programs than others did. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that most primary care units have in place health promotion programs. Public policies are needed to strengthen primary care services and improve training of health providers to meet the goals of the agenda for health promotion in Brazil.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
2015-02-02T12:39:13Z
2015-02-02T12:39:13Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249
Revista de Saúde Pública. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, v. 48, n. 5, p. 837-844, 2014.
0034-8910
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/114109
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249
S0034-89102014000500837
S0034-89102014000500837.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/114109
identifier_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública. Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo, v. 48, n. 5, p. 837-844, 2014.
0034-8910
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249
S0034-89102014000500837
S0034-89102014000500837.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública
1.911
0,807
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 837-844
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Faculdade de Saúde Pública da Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv SciELO
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129477121671168