Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Arthur C. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Bovolenta, Luiz A. [UNESP], Nachtigall, Pedro G. [UNESP], Herkenhoff, Marcos E. [UNESP], Lemke, Ney [UNESP], Pinhal, Danillo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00059
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174667
Resumo: Target prediction is generally the first step toward recognition of bona fide microRNA (miRNA)-target interactions in living cells. Several target prediction tools are now available, which use distinct criteria and stringency to provide the best set of candidate targets for a single miRNA or a subset of miRNAs. However, there are many false-negative predictions, and consensus about the optimum strategy to select and use the output information provided by the target prediction tools is lacking. We compared the performance of four tools cited in literature-TargetScan (TS), miRanda-mirSVR (MR), Pita, and RNA22 (R22), and we determined the most effective approach for analyzing target prediction data (individual, union, or intersection). For this purpose, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and correlation of these approaches using 10 miRNAs (miR-1-3p, miR-17-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-24-3p, miR-29a-3p, miR-34a-5p, miR-124-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-145-5p, and miR-155-5p) and 1,400 genes (700 validated and 700 non-validated) as targets of these miRNAs. The four tools provided a subset of high-quality predictions and returned few false-positive predictions; however, they could not identify several known true targets. We demonstrate that union of TS/MR and TS/MR/R22 enhanced the quality of in silico prediction analysis of miRNA targets. We conclude that the union rather than the intersection of the aforementioned tools is the best strategy for maximizing performance while minimizing the loss of time and resources in subsequent in vivo and in vitro experiments for functional validation of miRNA-target interactions.
id UNSP_32395aeb5543834ce01c37005daec3d6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174667
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analysesBioinformaticsIn silico predictionMiRanda-mirSVRNon-coding RNAPitaRNA22TargetScanTarget prediction is generally the first step toward recognition of bona fide microRNA (miRNA)-target interactions in living cells. Several target prediction tools are now available, which use distinct criteria and stringency to provide the best set of candidate targets for a single miRNA or a subset of miRNAs. However, there are many false-negative predictions, and consensus about the optimum strategy to select and use the output information provided by the target prediction tools is lacking. We compared the performance of four tools cited in literature-TargetScan (TS), miRanda-mirSVR (MR), Pita, and RNA22 (R22), and we determined the most effective approach for analyzing target prediction data (individual, union, or intersection). For this purpose, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and correlation of these approaches using 10 miRNAs (miR-1-3p, miR-17-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-24-3p, miR-29a-3p, miR-34a-5p, miR-124-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-145-5p, and miR-155-5p) and 1,400 genes (700 validated and 700 non-validated) as targets of these miRNAs. The four tools provided a subset of high-quality predictions and returned few false-positive predictions; however, they could not identify several known true targets. We demonstrate that union of TS/MR and TS/MR/R22 enhanced the quality of in silico prediction analysis of miRNA targets. We conclude that the union rather than the intersection of the aforementioned tools is the best strategy for maximizing performance while minimizing the loss of time and resources in subsequent in vivo and in vitro experiments for functional validation of miRNA-target interactions.Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Evolution Department of Genetics Institute of Biosciences of Botucatu São Paulo State Univesity (UNESP)Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biophysics Department of Physics and Biophysics Institute of Biosciences of Botucatu São Paulo State Univesity (UNESP)Laboratory of Genomics and Molecular Evolution Department of Genetics Institute of Biosciences of Botucatu São Paulo State Univesity (UNESP)Laboratory of Bioinformatics and Computational Biophysics Department of Physics and Biophysics Institute of Biosciences of Botucatu São Paulo State Univesity (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Oliveira, Arthur C. [UNESP]Bovolenta, Luiz A. [UNESP]Nachtigall, Pedro G. [UNESP]Herkenhoff, Marcos E. [UNESP]Lemke, Ney [UNESP]Pinhal, Danillo [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:12:20Z2018-12-11T17:12:20Z2017-05-09info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00059Frontiers in Genetics, v. 8, n. MAY, 2017.1664-8021http://hdl.handle.net/11449/17466710.3389/fgene.2017.000592-s2.0-850199362072-s2.0-85019936207.pdf7977035910952141Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengFrontiers in Genetics2,274info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-10-04T06:06:14Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/174667Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T13:59:25.866957Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
title Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
spellingShingle Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
Oliveira, Arthur C. [UNESP]
Bioinformatics
In silico prediction
MiRanda-mirSVR
Non-coding RNA
Pita
RNA22
TargetScan
title_short Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
title_full Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
title_fullStr Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
title_full_unstemmed Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
title_sort Combining results from distinct microRNA target prediction tools enhances the performance of analyses
author Oliveira, Arthur C. [UNESP]
author_facet Oliveira, Arthur C. [UNESP]
Bovolenta, Luiz A. [UNESP]
Nachtigall, Pedro G. [UNESP]
Herkenhoff, Marcos E. [UNESP]
Lemke, Ney [UNESP]
Pinhal, Danillo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Bovolenta, Luiz A. [UNESP]
Nachtigall, Pedro G. [UNESP]
Herkenhoff, Marcos E. [UNESP]
Lemke, Ney [UNESP]
Pinhal, Danillo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Arthur C. [UNESP]
Bovolenta, Luiz A. [UNESP]
Nachtigall, Pedro G. [UNESP]
Herkenhoff, Marcos E. [UNESP]
Lemke, Ney [UNESP]
Pinhal, Danillo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Bioinformatics
In silico prediction
MiRanda-mirSVR
Non-coding RNA
Pita
RNA22
TargetScan
topic Bioinformatics
In silico prediction
MiRanda-mirSVR
Non-coding RNA
Pita
RNA22
TargetScan
description Target prediction is generally the first step toward recognition of bona fide microRNA (miRNA)-target interactions in living cells. Several target prediction tools are now available, which use distinct criteria and stringency to provide the best set of candidate targets for a single miRNA or a subset of miRNAs. However, there are many false-negative predictions, and consensus about the optimum strategy to select and use the output information provided by the target prediction tools is lacking. We compared the performance of four tools cited in literature-TargetScan (TS), miRanda-mirSVR (MR), Pita, and RNA22 (R22), and we determined the most effective approach for analyzing target prediction data (individual, union, or intersection). For this purpose, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, precision, and correlation of these approaches using 10 miRNAs (miR-1-3p, miR-17-5p, miR-21-5p, miR-24-3p, miR-29a-3p, miR-34a-5p, miR-124-3p, miR-125b-5p, miR-145-5p, and miR-155-5p) and 1,400 genes (700 validated and 700 non-validated) as targets of these miRNAs. The four tools provided a subset of high-quality predictions and returned few false-positive predictions; however, they could not identify several known true targets. We demonstrate that union of TS/MR and TS/MR/R22 enhanced the quality of in silico prediction analysis of miRNA targets. We conclude that the union rather than the intersection of the aforementioned tools is the best strategy for maximizing performance while minimizing the loss of time and resources in subsequent in vivo and in vitro experiments for functional validation of miRNA-target interactions.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-05-09
2018-12-11T17:12:20Z
2018-12-11T17:12:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00059
Frontiers in Genetics, v. 8, n. MAY, 2017.
1664-8021
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174667
10.3389/fgene.2017.00059
2-s2.0-85019936207
2-s2.0-85019936207.pdf
7977035910952141
url http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2017.00059
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/174667
identifier_str_mv Frontiers in Genetics, v. 8, n. MAY, 2017.
1664-8021
10.3389/fgene.2017.00059
2-s2.0-85019936207
2-s2.0-85019936207.pdf
7977035910952141
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Frontiers in Genetics
2,274
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128301588283392