Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Palucci Vieira, Luiz H. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Cunha, Sergio A., Santiago, Paulo R., Dos Santos, Paulo C., Cardenas, Guilherme C. [UNESP], Barbieri, Ricardo A., Baptista, André M. [UNESP], Barbieri, Fabio A. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09654-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201384
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Task constraints and players’ asymmetry influences on lower extremity (i.e. kicking limb) kinematics during futsal instep kicking. However, support limb behavior when shooting in a futsal context was not previously investigated, and its potential role on such discrepant motor outputs is still unclear. Thus, the study aimed to compare kinematic features of the support limb and approach run between kicking a stationary and a rolling ball using dominant and non-dominant limbs. METHODS: Ten futsal players participated (21.88±2.86 years-old, 73.66±4.17 kg and 1.75±0.04 m) and performed kicks (five per limb per condition) with the dominant and non-dominant limbs in stationary and rolling ball conditions. Kinematic analysis comprised determination of support limb angular joint (hip, knee and ankle) displacement and velocity, approach run distance, angle, linear velocity, step length and width, support foot-to-ball distance, ball velocity (120 Hz) and accuracy (60 Hz). RESULTS: Hip adjustments (greater extension) in the support limb when kicking a rolling ball contributed in maintaining similar performance (e.g., ball velocity) to kicking a stationary ball, compensating for the lower approach run velocity and longer support foot to ball distance. Kicking with the non-dominant limb demonstrated a lower approach run velocity and the non-dominant support limb presented different angular motion compared to the dominant support limb in hip (< internal rotation), knee (< flexion), and ankle joints (< plantar flexion), being harmful to performance in both kicking stationary and rolling balls. CONCLUSIONS: Kicking a stationary and rolling ball presented similar performance, but compared to the dominant side, futsal instep kicks performed with the non-dominant support limb induces lower approach run velocity and inefficient angular joint motion, either harmful to performance output.
id UNSP_3f81657953c5216038393419765b9d46
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201384
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ballBiomechanical phenomenaFootballFunction lateralityMotor skillsBACKGROUND: Task constraints and players’ asymmetry influences on lower extremity (i.e. kicking limb) kinematics during futsal instep kicking. However, support limb behavior when shooting in a futsal context was not previously investigated, and its potential role on such discrepant motor outputs is still unclear. Thus, the study aimed to compare kinematic features of the support limb and approach run between kicking a stationary and a rolling ball using dominant and non-dominant limbs. METHODS: Ten futsal players participated (21.88±2.86 years-old, 73.66±4.17 kg and 1.75±0.04 m) and performed kicks (five per limb per condition) with the dominant and non-dominant limbs in stationary and rolling ball conditions. Kinematic analysis comprised determination of support limb angular joint (hip, knee and ankle) displacement and velocity, approach run distance, angle, linear velocity, step length and width, support foot-to-ball distance, ball velocity (120 Hz) and accuracy (60 Hz). RESULTS: Hip adjustments (greater extension) in the support limb when kicking a rolling ball contributed in maintaining similar performance (e.g., ball velocity) to kicking a stationary ball, compensating for the lower approach run velocity and longer support foot to ball distance. Kicking with the non-dominant limb demonstrated a lower approach run velocity and the non-dominant support limb presented different angular motion compared to the dominant support limb in hip (< internal rotation), knee (< flexion), and ankle joints (< plantar flexion), being harmful to performance in both kicking stationary and rolling balls. CONCLUSIONS: Kicking a stationary and rolling ball presented similar performance, but compared to the dominant side, futsal instep kicks performed with the non-dominant support limb induces lower approach run velocity and inefficient angular joint motion, either harmful to performance output.Human Movement Research Lab (MoVi-laB) Department of Physical Education São paulo State University (uneSp)Laboratory of Instrumentation for Biomechanics (liB) Faculty of Physical Education State University of Campinas (unicaMp)Biomechanics and Motor control lab (laBiocoM) School of physical education and Sport university of São paulo (uSp)center for human Movement Sciences university Medical center university of Groningenestácio university center of ribeirão pretoSchool of physical education Sport of ribeirão preto (eeferp) university of São paulo (uSp)Human Movement Research Lab (MoVi-laB) Department of Physical Education São paulo State University (uneSp)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)Universidade de São Paulo (USP)university of Groningenestácio university center of ribeirão pretoPalucci Vieira, Luiz H. [UNESP]Cunha, Sergio A.Santiago, Paulo R.Dos Santos, Paulo C.Cardenas, Guilherme C. [UNESP]Barbieri, Ricardo A.Baptista, André M. [UNESP]Barbieri, Fabio A. [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:31:10Z2020-12-12T02:31:10Z2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article1852-1860http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09654-3Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 59, n. 11, p. 1852-1860, 2019.1827-19280022-4707http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20138410.23736/S0022-4707.19.09654-32-s2.0-85076194859Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitnessinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-24T18:53:32Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201384Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T20:49:27.168083Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
title Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
spellingShingle Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
Palucci Vieira, Luiz H. [UNESP]
Biomechanical phenomena
Football
Function laterality
Motor skills
title_short Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
title_full Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
title_fullStr Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
title_full_unstemmed Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
title_sort Dominant/non-dominant support limb kinematics and approach run parameters in futsal kicking of stationary and rolling ball
author Palucci Vieira, Luiz H. [UNESP]
author_facet Palucci Vieira, Luiz H. [UNESP]
Cunha, Sergio A.
Santiago, Paulo R.
Dos Santos, Paulo C.
Cardenas, Guilherme C. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Ricardo A.
Baptista, André M. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Fabio A. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Cunha, Sergio A.
Santiago, Paulo R.
Dos Santos, Paulo C.
Cardenas, Guilherme C. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Ricardo A.
Baptista, André M. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Fabio A. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)
Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
university of Groningen
estácio university center of ribeirão preto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Palucci Vieira, Luiz H. [UNESP]
Cunha, Sergio A.
Santiago, Paulo R.
Dos Santos, Paulo C.
Cardenas, Guilherme C. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Ricardo A.
Baptista, André M. [UNESP]
Barbieri, Fabio A. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Biomechanical phenomena
Football
Function laterality
Motor skills
topic Biomechanical phenomena
Football
Function laterality
Motor skills
description BACKGROUND: Task constraints and players’ asymmetry influences on lower extremity (i.e. kicking limb) kinematics during futsal instep kicking. However, support limb behavior when shooting in a futsal context was not previously investigated, and its potential role on such discrepant motor outputs is still unclear. Thus, the study aimed to compare kinematic features of the support limb and approach run between kicking a stationary and a rolling ball using dominant and non-dominant limbs. METHODS: Ten futsal players participated (21.88±2.86 years-old, 73.66±4.17 kg and 1.75±0.04 m) and performed kicks (five per limb per condition) with the dominant and non-dominant limbs in stationary and rolling ball conditions. Kinematic analysis comprised determination of support limb angular joint (hip, knee and ankle) displacement and velocity, approach run distance, angle, linear velocity, step length and width, support foot-to-ball distance, ball velocity (120 Hz) and accuracy (60 Hz). RESULTS: Hip adjustments (greater extension) in the support limb when kicking a rolling ball contributed in maintaining similar performance (e.g., ball velocity) to kicking a stationary ball, compensating for the lower approach run velocity and longer support foot to ball distance. Kicking with the non-dominant limb demonstrated a lower approach run velocity and the non-dominant support limb presented different angular motion compared to the dominant support limb in hip (< internal rotation), knee (< flexion), and ankle joints (< plantar flexion), being harmful to performance in both kicking stationary and rolling balls. CONCLUSIONS: Kicking a stationary and rolling ball presented similar performance, but compared to the dominant side, futsal instep kicks performed with the non-dominant support limb induces lower approach run velocity and inefficient angular joint motion, either harmful to performance output.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
2020-12-12T02:31:10Z
2020-12-12T02:31:10Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09654-3
Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 59, n. 11, p. 1852-1860, 2019.
1827-1928
0022-4707
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201384
10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09654-3
2-s2.0-85076194859
url http://dx.doi.org/10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09654-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201384
identifier_str_mv Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, v. 59, n. 11, p. 1852-1860, 2019.
1827-1928
0022-4707
10.23736/S0022-4707.19.09654-3
2-s2.0-85076194859
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 1852-1860
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129254505840640