Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Giselle Schwab [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2018
Outros Autores: Gavassi, Marina Alves [UNESP], Nogueira, Matheus Armelin [UNESP], Habermann, Gustavo [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.017
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180117
Resumo: Stomatal aperture generally increases in response to low vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and decreases at high VPD. Aluminum (Al) inhibits root growth, indirectly exposing the roots to low water availability, which may decrease leaf hydration and, consequently, the stomatal conductance (gs). In this study, Citrus limonia (‘Rangpur’ lime) was grown in nutrient solution with 1480 μM Al for 90 days, and we expected that the presence of Al could prevent gs from responding to VPD. As expected, gs did not respond to the increase in VPD in plants exposed to Al. Aluminum also reduced the relative water content and midday leaf water potential (Ψmd) after 60 and 90 days. The CO2 assimilation rate (A) followed the same response pattern exhibited by gs, the estimation of the carboxylation efficiency was not reduced in plants exposed to Al and measured under drier air, while photochemical responses were slightly reduced in plants exposed to Al, indicating that the Al-induced decrease in A was dependent on gs and less ascribed to low photochemical performance. Like in drought conditions, the long-term exposure to Al reduces leaf hydration and compromises gs responses to the atmosphere, eventually impairing A in ‘Rangpur’ lime plants.
id UNSP_589b65d8a0de9e0c1ea2d549ded3b876
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/180117
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limoniaIndirect Al effectLeaf gas exchangeLeaf hydration‘Rangpur’ limeStomatal aperture generally increases in response to low vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and decreases at high VPD. Aluminum (Al) inhibits root growth, indirectly exposing the roots to low water availability, which may decrease leaf hydration and, consequently, the stomatal conductance (gs). In this study, Citrus limonia (‘Rangpur’ lime) was grown in nutrient solution with 1480 μM Al for 90 days, and we expected that the presence of Al could prevent gs from responding to VPD. As expected, gs did not respond to the increase in VPD in plants exposed to Al. Aluminum also reduced the relative water content and midday leaf water potential (Ψmd) after 60 and 90 days. The CO2 assimilation rate (A) followed the same response pattern exhibited by gs, the estimation of the carboxylation efficiency was not reduced in plants exposed to Al and measured under drier air, while photochemical responses were slightly reduced in plants exposed to Al, indicating that the Al-induced decrease in A was dependent on gs and less ascribed to low photochemical performance. Like in drought conditions, the long-term exposure to Al reduces leaf hydration and compromises gs responses to the atmosphere, eventually impairing A in ‘Rangpur’ lime plants.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Botânica, Av. 24-A, 1515Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Botânica, Av. 24-A, 1515Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Botânica, Av. 24-A, 1515Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) Instituto de Biociências Departamento de Botânica, Av. 24-A, 1515CNPq: 309149/2017-7Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Silva, Giselle Schwab [UNESP]Gavassi, Marina Alves [UNESP]Nogueira, Matheus Armelin [UNESP]Habermann, Gustavo [UNESP]2018-12-11T17:38:14Z2018-12-11T17:38:14Z2018-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article662-671application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.017Environmental and Experimental Botany, v. 155, p. 662-671.0098-8472http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18011710.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.0172-s2.0-850519732232-s2.0-85051973223.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengEnvironmental and Experimental Botany1,376info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-20T06:15:24Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/180117Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:15:51.979095Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
title Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
spellingShingle Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
Silva, Giselle Schwab [UNESP]
Indirect Al effect
Leaf gas exchange
Leaf hydration
‘Rangpur’ lime
title_short Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
title_full Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
title_fullStr Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
title_full_unstemmed Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
title_sort Aluminum prevents stomatal conductance from responding to vapor pressure deficit in Citrus limonia
author Silva, Giselle Schwab [UNESP]
author_facet Silva, Giselle Schwab [UNESP]
Gavassi, Marina Alves [UNESP]
Nogueira, Matheus Armelin [UNESP]
Habermann, Gustavo [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Gavassi, Marina Alves [UNESP]
Nogueira, Matheus Armelin [UNESP]
Habermann, Gustavo [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Giselle Schwab [UNESP]
Gavassi, Marina Alves [UNESP]
Nogueira, Matheus Armelin [UNESP]
Habermann, Gustavo [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Indirect Al effect
Leaf gas exchange
Leaf hydration
‘Rangpur’ lime
topic Indirect Al effect
Leaf gas exchange
Leaf hydration
‘Rangpur’ lime
description Stomatal aperture generally increases in response to low vapor pressure deficit (VPD) and decreases at high VPD. Aluminum (Al) inhibits root growth, indirectly exposing the roots to low water availability, which may decrease leaf hydration and, consequently, the stomatal conductance (gs). In this study, Citrus limonia (‘Rangpur’ lime) was grown in nutrient solution with 1480 μM Al for 90 days, and we expected that the presence of Al could prevent gs from responding to VPD. As expected, gs did not respond to the increase in VPD in plants exposed to Al. Aluminum also reduced the relative water content and midday leaf water potential (Ψmd) after 60 and 90 days. The CO2 assimilation rate (A) followed the same response pattern exhibited by gs, the estimation of the carboxylation efficiency was not reduced in plants exposed to Al and measured under drier air, while photochemical responses were slightly reduced in plants exposed to Al, indicating that the Al-induced decrease in A was dependent on gs and less ascribed to low photochemical performance. Like in drought conditions, the long-term exposure to Al reduces leaf hydration and compromises gs responses to the atmosphere, eventually impairing A in ‘Rangpur’ lime plants.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-12-11T17:38:14Z
2018-12-11T17:38:14Z
2018-11-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.017
Environmental and Experimental Botany, v. 155, p. 662-671.
0098-8472
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180117
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.017
2-s2.0-85051973223
2-s2.0-85051973223.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.017
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/180117
identifier_str_mv Environmental and Experimental Botany, v. 155, p. 662-671.
0098-8472
10.1016/j.envexpbot.2018.08.017
2-s2.0-85051973223
2-s2.0-85051973223.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Environmental and Experimental Botany
1,376
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 662-671
application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128913348493312