Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Zilio, Diego
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Carrara, Kester [UNESP], Leite, Felipe Lustosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237925
Resumo: One of the main arguments in favor of the metacontingency as a model for explaining social phenomena is that it embraces another kind of selection (cultural selection) beyond natural and operant selection. Despite being emergent on operant processes, it would not be reducible to operant selection. Consequently, cultural selection would demand a conceptual framework of its own, hence the metacontingency. Assuming the existence of another kind of selection is an ontological premise, and that this new process requires its own conceptual framework, because contingency analysis is insufficient to explain it, can be considered an epistemological premise. Our goal in this paper is to argue that the epistemological premise present in the metacontingency literature is wrong. To do so, we present pragmatic reductionism as a model to discuss the possibility of reductive explanations of selection and maintenance of cultural practices from metacontingency to contingency analysis. Based on this framework, we provide examples of pragmatic reductive interpretations, thought experiments, and an analysis of experimental data in which we try to explain away the metacontingency. We conclude that it is possible to pragmatically reduce metacontingency explanations to contingency explanations. That does not, however, invalidate the ontological premise about the existence of different processes related to cultural evolution and selection whatever those might be. It only shows that, if they exist at all, they are not the ones being studied in metacontingency research.
id UNSP_7378f440b936b6dd4fcdc1740b2f3819
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237925
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and MetacontingencyContingencyCultureEmergenceExplanationMetacontingencyReductionismOne of the main arguments in favor of the metacontingency as a model for explaining social phenomena is that it embraces another kind of selection (cultural selection) beyond natural and operant selection. Despite being emergent on operant processes, it would not be reducible to operant selection. Consequently, cultural selection would demand a conceptual framework of its own, hence the metacontingency. Assuming the existence of another kind of selection is an ontological premise, and that this new process requires its own conceptual framework, because contingency analysis is insufficient to explain it, can be considered an epistemological premise. Our goal in this paper is to argue that the epistemological premise present in the metacontingency literature is wrong. To do so, we present pragmatic reductionism as a model to discuss the possibility of reductive explanations of selection and maintenance of cultural practices from metacontingency to contingency analysis. Based on this framework, we provide examples of pragmatic reductive interpretations, thought experiments, and an analysis of experimental data in which we try to explain away the metacontingency. We conclude that it is possible to pragmatically reduce metacontingency explanations to contingency explanations. That does not, however, invalidate the ontological premise about the existence of different processes related to cultural evolution and selection whatever those might be. It only shows that, if they exist at all, they are not the ones being studied in metacontingency research.Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)Tutorial Education Program (PET) from the Ministry of Education (MEC)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fed Univ Espirito Santo UFES, Dept Social & Dev Psychol, Fernando Ferrari Ave 514,CEMUNI 6, BR-29075910 Vitoria, ES, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilITC Imagine Behav Technol, Fortaleza, Ceara, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, UNESP, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilFAPESP: 2013/17950-1SpringerUniversidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)ITC Imagine Behav TechnolZilio, DiegoCarrara, Kester [UNESP]Leite, Felipe Lustosa2022-11-30T15:19:45Z2022-11-30T15:19:45Z2022-06-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article35http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-zBehavior And Social Issues. New York: Springer, 35 p., 2022.1064-9506http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23792510.1007/s42822-022-00097-zWOS:000807919900001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengBehavior And Social Issuesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-09T18:36:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/237925Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-09T18:36:52Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
title Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
spellingShingle Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
Zilio, Diego
Contingency
Culture
Emergence
Explanation
Metacontingency
Reductionism
title_short Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
title_full Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
title_fullStr Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
title_full_unstemmed Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
title_sort Pragmatic Reductionism: On the Relation between Contingency and Metacontingency
author Zilio, Diego
author_facet Zilio, Diego
Carrara, Kester [UNESP]
Leite, Felipe Lustosa
author_role author
author2 Carrara, Kester [UNESP]
Leite, Felipe Lustosa
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo (UFES)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
ITC Imagine Behav Technol
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Zilio, Diego
Carrara, Kester [UNESP]
Leite, Felipe Lustosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Contingency
Culture
Emergence
Explanation
Metacontingency
Reductionism
topic Contingency
Culture
Emergence
Explanation
Metacontingency
Reductionism
description One of the main arguments in favor of the metacontingency as a model for explaining social phenomena is that it embraces another kind of selection (cultural selection) beyond natural and operant selection. Despite being emergent on operant processes, it would not be reducible to operant selection. Consequently, cultural selection would demand a conceptual framework of its own, hence the metacontingency. Assuming the existence of another kind of selection is an ontological premise, and that this new process requires its own conceptual framework, because contingency analysis is insufficient to explain it, can be considered an epistemological premise. Our goal in this paper is to argue that the epistemological premise present in the metacontingency literature is wrong. To do so, we present pragmatic reductionism as a model to discuss the possibility of reductive explanations of selection and maintenance of cultural practices from metacontingency to contingency analysis. Based on this framework, we provide examples of pragmatic reductive interpretations, thought experiments, and an analysis of experimental data in which we try to explain away the metacontingency. We conclude that it is possible to pragmatically reduce metacontingency explanations to contingency explanations. That does not, however, invalidate the ontological premise about the existence of different processes related to cultural evolution and selection whatever those might be. It only shows that, if they exist at all, they are not the ones being studied in metacontingency research.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-11-30T15:19:45Z
2022-11-30T15:19:45Z
2022-06-08
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z
Behavior And Social Issues. New York: Springer, 35 p., 2022.
1064-9506
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237925
10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z
WOS:000807919900001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/237925
identifier_str_mv Behavior And Social Issues. New York: Springer, 35 p., 2022.
1064-9506
10.1007/s42822-022-00097-z
WOS:000807919900001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Behavior And Social Issues
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 35
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128192374898688