Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2022 |
Outros Autores: | , , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234123 |
Resumo: | “Highly hazardous” pesticides have been listed and banned in Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified areas and producers from tropical countries in the southern hemisphere, such as Australia, Brazil and South Africa suffer the consequences of these restrictions. The objective was to assess changes and costs of FSC forest certification in the pest management from the perspective of certified foresters in South Africa. Questionnaires were sent to for all FSC certified forest plantations managers in South Africa until July 2014. Deltamethrin was considered the most needed active ingredient in derogation, but cypermethrin and alpha-cypermethrin were also considered necessary. A total of 37.5% of respondents were totally dissatisfied with the cost/benefit ratio of FSC certification related to pest management. Excessive rigidity and a lack of justifiable criteria for banning chemicals may turn the certification process difficult and reduce its adoption in South Africa, although FSC certification has made pest management more sustainable. |
id |
UNSP_752d60342829540ab8ab78345a8be3bd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234123 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South AfricaCertificationForest entomologyIPMPesticidesSustainable forest management“Highly hazardous” pesticides have been listed and banned in Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified areas and producers from tropical countries in the southern hemisphere, such as Australia, Brazil and South Africa suffer the consequences of these restrictions. The objective was to assess changes and costs of FSC forest certification in the pest management from the perspective of certified foresters in South Africa. Questionnaires were sent to for all FSC certified forest plantations managers in South Africa until July 2014. Deltamethrin was considered the most needed active ingredient in derogation, but cypermethrin and alpha-cypermethrin were also considered necessary. A total of 37.5% of respondents were totally dissatisfied with the cost/benefit ratio of FSC certification related to pest management. Excessive rigidity and a lack of justifiable criteria for banning chemicals may turn the certification process difficult and reduce its adoption in South Africa, although FSC certification has made pest management more sustainable.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)University of the Sunshine CoastInstituto de Ciências Agrárias Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Universitária, 1000, Universitário, Minas GeraisUniversity of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy DownsDepartamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, ViçosaDepartamento de Engenharia Florestal Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, ViçosaDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, São PauloDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, São PauloCAPES: BEX 11710/13-6Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)University of the Sunshine CoastUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Lemes, Pedro G.Lawson, Simon A.Zanuncio, José C.Jacovine, Laercio A.G.Torres, Carlos M.M.E.Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP]2022-05-01T13:41:32Z2022-05-01T13:41:32Z2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article103-125http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543Journal of Forest Economics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 103-125, 2022.1618-15301104-6899http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23412310.1561/112.000005432-s2.0-85124343455Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Forest Economicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T18:06:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234123Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:24:07.189027Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa |
title |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa |
spellingShingle |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa Lemes, Pedro G. Certification Forest entomology IPM Pesticides Sustainable forest management |
title_short |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa |
title_full |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa |
title_fullStr |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa |
title_sort |
Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa |
author |
Lemes, Pedro G. |
author_facet |
Lemes, Pedro G. Lawson, Simon A. Zanuncio, José C. Jacovine, Laercio A.G. Torres, Carlos M.M.E. Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Lawson, Simon A. Zanuncio, José C. Jacovine, Laercio A.G. Torres, Carlos M.M.E. Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG) University of the Sunshine Coast Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Lemes, Pedro G. Lawson, Simon A. Zanuncio, José C. Jacovine, Laercio A.G. Torres, Carlos M.M.E. Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Certification Forest entomology IPM Pesticides Sustainable forest management |
topic |
Certification Forest entomology IPM Pesticides Sustainable forest management |
description |
“Highly hazardous” pesticides have been listed and banned in Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified areas and producers from tropical countries in the southern hemisphere, such as Australia, Brazil and South Africa suffer the consequences of these restrictions. The objective was to assess changes and costs of FSC forest certification in the pest management from the perspective of certified foresters in South Africa. Questionnaires were sent to for all FSC certified forest plantations managers in South Africa until July 2014. Deltamethrin was considered the most needed active ingredient in derogation, but cypermethrin and alpha-cypermethrin were also considered necessary. A total of 37.5% of respondents were totally dissatisfied with the cost/benefit ratio of FSC certification related to pest management. Excessive rigidity and a lack of justifiable criteria for banning chemicals may turn the certification process difficult and reduce its adoption in South Africa, although FSC certification has made pest management more sustainable. |
publishDate |
2022 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-05-01T13:41:32Z 2022-05-01T13:41:32Z 2022-02-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543 Journal of Forest Economics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 103-125, 2022. 1618-1530 1104-6899 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234123 10.1561/112.00000543 2-s2.0-85124343455 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234123 |
identifier_str_mv |
Journal of Forest Economics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 103-125, 2022. 1618-1530 1104-6899 10.1561/112.00000543 2-s2.0-85124343455 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Forest Economics |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
103-125 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128509461135360 |