Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lemes, Pedro G.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Lawson, Simon A., Zanuncio, José C., Jacovine, Laercio A.G., Torres, Carlos M.M.E., Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234123
Resumo: “Highly hazardous” pesticides have been listed and banned in Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified areas and producers from tropical countries in the southern hemisphere, such as Australia, Brazil and South Africa suffer the consequences of these restrictions. The objective was to assess changes and costs of FSC forest certification in the pest management from the perspective of certified foresters in South Africa. Questionnaires were sent to for all FSC certified forest plantations managers in South Africa until July 2014. Deltamethrin was considered the most needed active ingredient in derogation, but cypermethrin and alpha-cypermethrin were also considered necessary. A total of 37.5% of respondents were totally dissatisfied with the cost/benefit ratio of FSC certification related to pest management. Excessive rigidity and a lack of justifiable criteria for banning chemicals may turn the certification process difficult and reduce its adoption in South Africa, although FSC certification has made pest management more sustainable.
id UNSP_752d60342829540ab8ab78345a8be3bd
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234123
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South AfricaCertificationForest entomologyIPMPesticidesSustainable forest management“Highly hazardous” pesticides have been listed and banned in Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified areas and producers from tropical countries in the southern hemisphere, such as Australia, Brazil and South Africa suffer the consequences of these restrictions. The objective was to assess changes and costs of FSC forest certification in the pest management from the perspective of certified foresters in South Africa. Questionnaires were sent to for all FSC certified forest plantations managers in South Africa until July 2014. Deltamethrin was considered the most needed active ingredient in derogation, but cypermethrin and alpha-cypermethrin were also considered necessary. A total of 37.5% of respondents were totally dissatisfied with the cost/benefit ratio of FSC certification related to pest management. Excessive rigidity and a lack of justifiable criteria for banning chemicals may turn the certification process difficult and reduce its adoption in South Africa, although FSC certification has made pest management more sustainable.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais (FAPEMIG)University of the Sunshine CoastInstituto de Ciências Agrárias Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Universitária, 1000, Universitário, Minas GeraisUniversity of the Sunshine Coast, 90 Sippy Downs Dr, Sippy DownsDepartamento de Entomologia/BIOAGRO Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, ViçosaDepartamento de Engenharia Florestal Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, ViçosaDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, São PauloDepartamento de Produção Vegetal Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, São PauloCAPES: BEX 11710/13-6Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)University of the Sunshine CoastUniversidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Lemes, Pedro G.Lawson, Simon A.Zanuncio, José C.Jacovine, Laercio A.G.Torres, Carlos M.M.E.Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP]2022-05-01T13:41:32Z2022-05-01T13:41:32Z2022-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article103-125http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543Journal of Forest Economics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 103-125, 2022.1618-15301104-6899http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23412310.1561/112.000005432-s2.0-85124343455Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Forest Economicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-04-30T18:06:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/234123Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T15:24:07.189027Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
title Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
spellingShingle Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
Lemes, Pedro G.
Certification
Forest entomology
IPM
Pesticides
Sustainable forest management
title_short Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
title_full Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
title_fullStr Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
title_full_unstemmed Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
title_sort Impact of Forest Stewardship Council on Integrated Pest Management in Certified Plantations of South Africa
author Lemes, Pedro G.
author_facet Lemes, Pedro G.
Lawson, Simon A.
Zanuncio, José C.
Jacovine, Laercio A.G.
Torres, Carlos M.M.E.
Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Lawson, Simon A.
Zanuncio, José C.
Jacovine, Laercio A.G.
Torres, Carlos M.M.E.
Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
University of the Sunshine Coast
Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lemes, Pedro G.
Lawson, Simon A.
Zanuncio, José C.
Jacovine, Laercio A.G.
Torres, Carlos M.M.E.
Wilcken, Carlos F. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Certification
Forest entomology
IPM
Pesticides
Sustainable forest management
topic Certification
Forest entomology
IPM
Pesticides
Sustainable forest management
description “Highly hazardous” pesticides have been listed and banned in Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) certified areas and producers from tropical countries in the southern hemisphere, such as Australia, Brazil and South Africa suffer the consequences of these restrictions. The objective was to assess changes and costs of FSC forest certification in the pest management from the perspective of certified foresters in South Africa. Questionnaires were sent to for all FSC certified forest plantations managers in South Africa until July 2014. Deltamethrin was considered the most needed active ingredient in derogation, but cypermethrin and alpha-cypermethrin were also considered necessary. A total of 37.5% of respondents were totally dissatisfied with the cost/benefit ratio of FSC certification related to pest management. Excessive rigidity and a lack of justifiable criteria for banning chemicals may turn the certification process difficult and reduce its adoption in South Africa, although FSC certification has made pest management more sustainable.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-05-01T13:41:32Z
2022-05-01T13:41:32Z
2022-02-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543
Journal of Forest Economics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 103-125, 2022.
1618-1530
1104-6899
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234123
10.1561/112.00000543
2-s2.0-85124343455
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1561/112.00000543
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/234123
identifier_str_mv Journal of Forest Economics, v. 37, n. 1, p. 103-125, 2022.
1618-1530
1104-6899
10.1561/112.00000543
2-s2.0-85124343455
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Forest Economics
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 103-125
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128509461135360