Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Stape, Jose Luiz [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Silva, C. R., Binkley, Dan
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100235
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223600
Resumo: The choice of initial spacing (stocking or density) for plantations influences the amount of growth resources available for each tree, rates of growth and survival, and the stand-level wood production and profit. A given number of trees per hectare can be arranged in various geometric ways, with designs varying the spacing between planting rows, and the distance between trees within rows. Large distances between rows lower costs of site preparation, but tight packing of trees within rows may limit light interception, leading to rapid forest stratification (into dominant and suppressed classes) and increasing risks of weed competition and wind damage. We evaluated the effects of spacing (m2 tree−1) and geometric layout (distances between rows, and between trees within rows) on the productivity of two Eucalyptus grandis x E. urophylla clones. A complete 2 × 3 × 3 factorial design was applied to two clones, with three spacing levels (6.0, 10.5 and 15.0 m² tree−1) and 3 between-row distances (3, 6, and 9 m). After 6 years, Clone 1 was 11% more productive (MAI 33.8 m³ ha−1 yr−1) than Clone 2 (MAI 30.5 m³ ha−1 yr−1), largely owing to greater wind damage of Clone 2 (especially at wide between-row spacings). The highest growth for both clones occurred at the densest spacing (6.0 m² tree−1), with a yield of 212 m³ ha−1. Greater spacing lowered stand yield by 10% (10.5 m² tree−1) to 18% (15.0 m² tree−1). Increasing distances between rows (coupled with decreasing distances between trees within rows) also decreased yields, dropping by 16% as between-row distance increased from 3 to 9 m. High densities of trees planted in a square design gave the greatest yields.
id UNSP_799802ced101066ae3237754424fd157
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223600
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantationsThe choice of initial spacing (stocking or density) for plantations influences the amount of growth resources available for each tree, rates of growth and survival, and the stand-level wood production and profit. A given number of trees per hectare can be arranged in various geometric ways, with designs varying the spacing between planting rows, and the distance between trees within rows. Large distances between rows lower costs of site preparation, but tight packing of trees within rows may limit light interception, leading to rapid forest stratification (into dominant and suppressed classes) and increasing risks of weed competition and wind damage. We evaluated the effects of spacing (m2 tree−1) and geometric layout (distances between rows, and between trees within rows) on the productivity of two Eucalyptus grandis x E. urophylla clones. A complete 2 × 3 × 3 factorial design was applied to two clones, with three spacing levels (6.0, 10.5 and 15.0 m² tree−1) and 3 between-row distances (3, 6, and 9 m). After 6 years, Clone 1 was 11% more productive (MAI 33.8 m³ ha−1 yr−1) than Clone 2 (MAI 30.5 m³ ha−1 yr−1), largely owing to greater wind damage of Clone 2 (especially at wide between-row spacings). The highest growth for both clones occurred at the densest spacing (6.0 m² tree−1), with a yield of 212 m³ ha−1. Greater spacing lowered stand yield by 10% (10.5 m² tree−1) to 18% (15.0 m² tree−1). Increasing distances between rows (coupled with decreasing distances between trees within rows) also decreased yields, dropping by 16% as between-row distance increased from 3 to 9 m. High densities of trees planted in a square design gave the greatest yields.Department of Forest Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Montes del PlataSchool of Forestry Northern Arizona University, AZDepartment of Forest Sciences Sao Paulo State University (UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Montes del PlataNorthern Arizona UniversityStape, Jose Luiz [UNESP]Silva, C. R.Binkley, Dan2022-04-28T19:51:34Z2022-04-28T19:51:34Z2022-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100235Trees, Forests and People, v. 8.2666-7193http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22360010.1016/j.tfp.2022.1002352-s2.0-85126055167Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTrees, Forests and Peopleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-28T19:51:34Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/223600Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:04:42.739326Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
title Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
spellingShingle Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
Stape, Jose Luiz [UNESP]
title_short Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
title_full Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
title_fullStr Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
title_full_unstemmed Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
title_sort Spacing and geometric layout effects on the productivity of clonal Eucalyptus plantations
author Stape, Jose Luiz [UNESP]
author_facet Stape, Jose Luiz [UNESP]
Silva, C. R.
Binkley, Dan
author_role author
author2 Silva, C. R.
Binkley, Dan
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Montes del Plata
Northern Arizona University
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Stape, Jose Luiz [UNESP]
Silva, C. R.
Binkley, Dan
description The choice of initial spacing (stocking or density) for plantations influences the amount of growth resources available for each tree, rates of growth and survival, and the stand-level wood production and profit. A given number of trees per hectare can be arranged in various geometric ways, with designs varying the spacing between planting rows, and the distance between trees within rows. Large distances between rows lower costs of site preparation, but tight packing of trees within rows may limit light interception, leading to rapid forest stratification (into dominant and suppressed classes) and increasing risks of weed competition and wind damage. We evaluated the effects of spacing (m2 tree−1) and geometric layout (distances between rows, and between trees within rows) on the productivity of two Eucalyptus grandis x E. urophylla clones. A complete 2 × 3 × 3 factorial design was applied to two clones, with three spacing levels (6.0, 10.5 and 15.0 m² tree−1) and 3 between-row distances (3, 6, and 9 m). After 6 years, Clone 1 was 11% more productive (MAI 33.8 m³ ha−1 yr−1) than Clone 2 (MAI 30.5 m³ ha−1 yr−1), largely owing to greater wind damage of Clone 2 (especially at wide between-row spacings). The highest growth for both clones occurred at the densest spacing (6.0 m² tree−1), with a yield of 212 m³ ha−1. Greater spacing lowered stand yield by 10% (10.5 m² tree−1) to 18% (15.0 m² tree−1). Increasing distances between rows (coupled with decreasing distances between trees within rows) also decreased yields, dropping by 16% as between-row distance increased from 3 to 9 m. High densities of trees planted in a square design gave the greatest yields.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-04-28T19:51:34Z
2022-04-28T19:51:34Z
2022-06-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100235
Trees, Forests and People, v. 8.
2666-7193
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223600
10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100235
2-s2.0-85126055167
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100235
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/223600
identifier_str_mv Trees, Forests and People, v. 8.
2666-7193
10.1016/j.tfp.2022.100235
2-s2.0-85126055167
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Trees, Forests and People
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128752121544704