Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2006 |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762006000200008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69200 |
Resumo: | Using data collected in nine countries - Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Poland, Russian Federation, Finland, Germany and the USA - through the World Values Survey, the article analyses the validity of four variables with a supposed potential to evaluate the legitimacy level of the private sector vis-à-vis the public sector. This analysis in undertaken in the context of the discussions on the future of market reforms that were implemented in several countries in the past 20 years. The investigation adopted a two level strategy: first, the aggregated frequencies for the nine countries were analyzed, followed by a bivariate analysis aimed at verifying the internal consistency of the variables. The article concludes that the four variables under consideration do not compose a valid dimension capable of assessing the legitimacy of the public sector versus the private sector. |
id |
UNSP_93f716cea4d0f564ae4a2739da2cb140 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69200 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercadoLegitimacyMarket reformsPolitical culturePublic opinionUsing data collected in nine countries - Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Poland, Russian Federation, Finland, Germany and the USA - through the World Values Survey, the article analyses the validity of four variables with a supposed potential to evaluate the legitimacy level of the private sector vis-à-vis the public sector. This analysis in undertaken in the context of the discussions on the future of market reforms that were implemented in several countries in the past 20 years. The investigation adopted a two level strategy: first, the aggregated frequencies for the nine countries were analyzed, followed by a bivariate analysis aimed at verifying the internal consistency of the variables. The article concludes that the four variables under consideration do not compose a valid dimension capable of assessing the legitimacy of the public sector versus the private sector.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Medsquita FilhoUniversidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Medsquita FilhoUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Andrews, Christina W. [UNESP]2014-05-27T11:22:01Z2014-05-27T11:22:01Z2006-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article407-431application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762006000200008Opiniao Publica, v. 12, n. 2, p. 407-431, 2006.0104-62761807-0191http://hdl.handle.net/11449/6920010.1590/S0104-62762006000200008S0104-627620060002000082-s2.0-33845700400S0104-62762006000200008.pdfScopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPporOpinião Pública0,573info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-12-25T06:16:55Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/69200Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:12:00.300603Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado |
title |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado |
spellingShingle |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado Andrews, Christina W. [UNESP] Legitimacy Market reforms Political culture Public opinion |
title_short |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado |
title_full |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado |
title_fullStr |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado |
title_full_unstemmed |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado |
title_sort |
Investigando a legitimidade: Estudo de atitudes de público em relação aos papéis do Estado e do mercado |
author |
Andrews, Christina W. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Andrews, Christina W. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Andrews, Christina W. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Legitimacy Market reforms Political culture Public opinion |
topic |
Legitimacy Market reforms Political culture Public opinion |
description |
Using data collected in nine countries - Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Czech Republic, Poland, Russian Federation, Finland, Germany and the USA - through the World Values Survey, the article analyses the validity of four variables with a supposed potential to evaluate the legitimacy level of the private sector vis-à-vis the public sector. This analysis in undertaken in the context of the discussions on the future of market reforms that were implemented in several countries in the past 20 years. The investigation adopted a two level strategy: first, the aggregated frequencies for the nine countries were analyzed, followed by a bivariate analysis aimed at verifying the internal consistency of the variables. The article concludes that the four variables under consideration do not compose a valid dimension capable of assessing the legitimacy of the public sector versus the private sector. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-11-01 2014-05-27T11:22:01Z 2014-05-27T11:22:01Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762006000200008 Opiniao Publica, v. 12, n. 2, p. 407-431, 2006. 0104-6276 1807-0191 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69200 10.1590/S0104-62762006000200008 S0104-62762006000200008 2-s2.0-33845700400 S0104-62762006000200008.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0104-62762006000200008 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/69200 |
identifier_str_mv |
Opiniao Publica, v. 12, n. 2, p. 407-431, 2006. 0104-6276 1807-0191 10.1590/S0104-62762006000200008 S0104-62762006000200008 2-s2.0-33845700400 S0104-62762006000200008.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Opinião Pública 0,573 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
407-431 application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129297701928960 |