Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0264 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163206 |
Resumo: | The asymmetry indexes have helped cytotaxonomists to interpret and classify plant karyotypes for species delimitation efforts. However, there is no consensus about the best method to calculate the intrachromosomal asymmetry. The present study aimed to compare different intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes in order to indicate which are more efficient for the estimation of asymmetry in different groups of orchids. Besides, we aimed to compare our results with the Orchidaceae phylogenetic proposal to test the hypothesis of Stebbins (1971). Through a literature review, karyotypes were selected and analyzed comparatively with ideal karyotypes in a cluster analysis. All karyotypes showed some level of interchromosomal asymmetry, ranging from slightly asymmetric to moderately asymmetric. The five tested intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes indicated Sarcoglottis grandiflora as the species with the most symmetrical karyotype and Christensonella pachyphylla with the most asymmetrical karyotype. In the cluster analysis, the largest number of species were grouped with the intermediary ideal karyotypes B or C. Considering our results, we recommend the combined use of at least two indexes, especially Ask% or A1 with Syi, for cytotaxonomic analysis in groups of orchids. In an evolutionary perspective, our results support Stebbins' hypothesis that asymmetric karyotypes derive from a symmetric karyotypes. |
id |
UNSP_a892869ba3d6422b7cc5cd09ba96f59b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163206 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in OrchidaceaeAsymmetry indexkaryotype symmetrychromosomecytogeneticevolutionThe asymmetry indexes have helped cytotaxonomists to interpret and classify plant karyotypes for species delimitation efforts. However, there is no consensus about the best method to calculate the intrachromosomal asymmetry. The present study aimed to compare different intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes in order to indicate which are more efficient for the estimation of asymmetry in different groups of orchids. Besides, we aimed to compare our results with the Orchidaceae phylogenetic proposal to test the hypothesis of Stebbins (1971). Through a literature review, karyotypes were selected and analyzed comparatively with ideal karyotypes in a cluster analysis. All karyotypes showed some level of interchromosomal asymmetry, ranging from slightly asymmetric to moderately asymmetric. The five tested intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes indicated Sarcoglottis grandiflora as the species with the most symmetrical karyotype and Christensonella pachyphylla with the most asymmetrical karyotype. In the cluster analysis, the largest number of species were grouped with the intermediary ideal karyotypes B or C. Considering our results, we recommend the combined use of at least two indexes, especially Ask% or A1 with Syi, for cytotaxonomic analysis in groups of orchids. In an evolutionary perspective, our results support Stebbins' hypothesis that asymmetric karyotypes derive from a symmetric karyotypes.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa de Sao PauloUniv Fed Paraiba, Ctr Ciencias Agr, Lab Citogenet Vegetal, Dept Ciencias Biol, Campus 2, BR-58397000 Areia, PB, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Genet, Botucatu, SP, BrazilUniv Fed Sao Paulo, Inst Ciencias & Tecnol, Sao Jose Dos Campos, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Inst Biociencias, Dept Genet, Botucatu, SP, BrazilCNPq: 400209/2014-4CNPq: 460990/2014-4Fundacao de Apoio a Pesquisa de Sao Paulo: FAPESP 2011/22215-3Soc Brasil GeneticaUniv Fed ParaibaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)Medeiros-Neto, EnoqueNollet, FelipeMoraes, Ana Paula [UNESP]Felix, Leonardo P.2018-11-26T17:40:31Z2018-11-26T17:40:31Z2017-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article610-619application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0264Genetics And Molecular Biology. Ribeirao Pret: Soc Brasil Genetica, v. 40, n. 3, p. 610-619, 2017.1415-4757http://hdl.handle.net/11449/16320610.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0264S1415-47572017000400610WOS:000409372000008S1415-47572017000400610.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengGenetics And Molecular Biology0,638info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-11-24T06:12:44Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/163206Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T18:34:40.273878Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae |
title |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae |
spellingShingle |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae Medeiros-Neto, Enoque Asymmetry index karyotype symmetry chromosome cytogenetic evolution |
title_short |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae |
title_full |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae |
title_fullStr |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae |
title_full_unstemmed |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae |
title_sort |
Intrachromosomal karyotype asymmetry in Orchidaceae |
author |
Medeiros-Neto, Enoque |
author_facet |
Medeiros-Neto, Enoque Nollet, Felipe Moraes, Ana Paula [UNESP] Felix, Leonardo P. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Nollet, Felipe Moraes, Ana Paula [UNESP] Felix, Leonardo P. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Univ Fed Paraiba Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Medeiros-Neto, Enoque Nollet, Felipe Moraes, Ana Paula [UNESP] Felix, Leonardo P. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Asymmetry index karyotype symmetry chromosome cytogenetic evolution |
topic |
Asymmetry index karyotype symmetry chromosome cytogenetic evolution |
description |
The asymmetry indexes have helped cytotaxonomists to interpret and classify plant karyotypes for species delimitation efforts. However, there is no consensus about the best method to calculate the intrachromosomal asymmetry. The present study aimed to compare different intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes in order to indicate which are more efficient for the estimation of asymmetry in different groups of orchids. Besides, we aimed to compare our results with the Orchidaceae phylogenetic proposal to test the hypothesis of Stebbins (1971). Through a literature review, karyotypes were selected and analyzed comparatively with ideal karyotypes in a cluster analysis. All karyotypes showed some level of interchromosomal asymmetry, ranging from slightly asymmetric to moderately asymmetric. The five tested intrachromosomal asymmetry indexes indicated Sarcoglottis grandiflora as the species with the most symmetrical karyotype and Christensonella pachyphylla with the most asymmetrical karyotype. In the cluster analysis, the largest number of species were grouped with the intermediary ideal karyotypes B or C. Considering our results, we recommend the combined use of at least two indexes, especially Ask% or A1 with Syi, for cytotaxonomic analysis in groups of orchids. In an evolutionary perspective, our results support Stebbins' hypothesis that asymmetric karyotypes derive from a symmetric karyotypes. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-01 2018-11-26T17:40:31Z 2018-11-26T17:40:31Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0264 Genetics And Molecular Biology. Ribeirao Pret: Soc Brasil Genetica, v. 40, n. 3, p. 610-619, 2017. 1415-4757 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163206 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0264 S1415-47572017000400610 WOS:000409372000008 S1415-47572017000400610.pdf |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0264 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/163206 |
identifier_str_mv |
Genetics And Molecular Biology. Ribeirao Pret: Soc Brasil Genetica, v. 40, n. 3, p. 610-619, 2017. 1415-4757 10.1590/1678-4685-GMB-2016-0264 S1415-47572017000400610 WOS:000409372000008 S1415-47572017000400610.pdf |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Genetics And Molecular Biology 0,638 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
610-619 application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasil Genetica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Soc Brasil Genetica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128951275487232 |