Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | , , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201836 |
Resumo: | This study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian’s tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement. |
id |
UNSP_af62592377d973686f1d0d54aca1afcf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201836 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pasturesDry seasonSupplementationTotal operational costsWet seasonThis study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian’s tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – Unesp, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane s/nDepartment of Animal Production Institute of Animal Husbandry Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), 238.970-00, SeropédicaUniversity of New England – UNESão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – Unesp, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane s/nCNPq: 142188/2016-6Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)University of New England – UNERomanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]Barbero, Rondineli PavezziReis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP]Hadley, DavidMalheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:43:07Z2020-12-12T02:43:07Z2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2659-2666http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 52, n. 5, p. 2659-2666, 2020.1573-74380049-4747http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20183610.1007/s11250-020-02304-82-s2.0-85085898785Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTropical Animal Health and Productioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:39:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201836Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:02:22.416761Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures |
title |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures |
spellingShingle |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP] Dry season Supplementation Total operational costs Wet season |
title_short |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures |
title_full |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures |
title_fullStr |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures |
title_full_unstemmed |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures |
title_sort |
Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures |
author |
Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP] Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi Reis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP] Hadley, David Malheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi Reis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP] Hadley, David Malheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ) University of New England – UNE |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP] Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi Reis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP] Hadley, David Malheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Dry season Supplementation Total operational costs Wet season |
topic |
Dry season Supplementation Total operational costs Wet season |
description |
This study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian’s tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-12T02:43:07Z 2020-12-12T02:43:07Z 2020-09-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8 Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 52, n. 5, p. 2659-2666, 2020. 1573-7438 0049-4747 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201836 10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8 2-s2.0-85085898785 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201836 |
identifier_str_mv |
Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 52, n. 5, p. 2659-2666, 2020. 1573-7438 0049-4747 10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8 2-s2.0-85085898785 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Tropical Animal Health and Production |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
2659-2666 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128308061143040 |