Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi, Reis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP], Hadley, David, Malheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201836
Resumo: This study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian’s tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement.
id UNSP_af62592377d973686f1d0d54aca1afcf
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201836
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pasturesDry seasonSupplementationTotal operational costsWet seasonThis study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian’s tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)São Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – Unesp, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane s/nDepartment of Animal Production Institute of Animal Husbandry Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ), 238.970-00, SeropédicaUniversity of New England – UNESão Paulo State University “Júlio de Mesquita Filho” – Unesp, Via de Acesso Prof. Paulo Donatto Castellane s/nCNPq: 142188/2016-6Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)University of New England – UNERomanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]Barbero, Rondineli PavezziReis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP]Hadley, DavidMalheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP]2020-12-12T02:43:07Z2020-12-12T02:43:07Z2020-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2659-2666http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 52, n. 5, p. 2659-2666, 2020.1573-74380049-4747http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20183610.1007/s11250-020-02304-82-s2.0-85085898785Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengTropical Animal Health and Productioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-06-07T18:39:26Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/201836Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:02:22.416761Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
title Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
spellingShingle Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]
Dry season
Supplementation
Total operational costs
Wet season
title_short Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
title_full Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
title_fullStr Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
title_full_unstemmed Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
title_sort Economic evaluation from beef cattle production industry with intensification in Brazil’s tropical pastures
author Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]
author_facet Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]
Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi
Reis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP]
Hadley, David
Malheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi
Reis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP]
Hadley, David
Malheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRRJ)
University of New England – UNE
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Romanzini, Eliéder Prates [UNESP]
Barbero, Rondineli Pavezzi
Reis, Ricardo Andrade [UNESP]
Hadley, David
Malheiros, Euclides Braga [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Dry season
Supplementation
Total operational costs
Wet season
topic Dry season
Supplementation
Total operational costs
Wet season
description This study aimed to evaluate different scenarios (year, supplementation level) about economic results of beef cattle production during rearing and finishing phase in Brazilian’s tropical pastures. Four scenarios were evaluated in combination with fourteen supplements, and it was originated from some research developed inside Forage Crops and Grasslands section from São Paulo State University among years 2011 and 2014. The economic evaluation was analyzed by operating cost, total operational costs, gross revenue, operating profit, and financial net income. Besides profitability, internal rate of return (IRR), benefit/cost ratio (B:C), and simple payback period (SPP) were calculated too. During rearing phase, the best result was observed for scenario 2 (2012), supplement 3.2 (mineral mix) with values of 11 cycles, 26.3%, 9.30%, and 0.39 for SPP, profitability, IRR, and B:C ratio, respectively. Already to finishing phase, the best scenario was 3 (2013), supplement 10 (multiple supplement with supplementation level equal 1.0% body weight), which obtained 4 cycles, 68.7%, 27.00%, and 2.34 for the same variables above mentioned. Results were consistent being that higher IRR and profitability occurred when using low supplementation level. Hence, the economic responses from different scenarios (years and supplements) can alter the final livestock farm financial statement.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-12T02:43:07Z
2020-12-12T02:43:07Z
2020-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8
Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 52, n. 5, p. 2659-2666, 2020.
1573-7438
0049-4747
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201836
10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8
2-s2.0-85085898785
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/201836
identifier_str_mv Tropical Animal Health and Production, v. 52, n. 5, p. 2659-2666, 2020.
1573-7438
0049-4747
10.1007/s11250-020-02304-8
2-s2.0-85085898785
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Tropical Animal Health and Production
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2659-2666
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128308061143040