Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Marina Reis [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Gonçalves, Andréa [UNESP], Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini [UNESP], de Andrade, Cleverton Roberto [UNESP], Vieira, Eduardo Hochuli [UNESP], Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007405
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229651
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the bone quality of the maxilla and mandible by using the classification proposed by Lekholm and Zarb (L & Z) and histomorphometry. METHODS: Sixty edentulous areas were evaluated. The classification by L & Z was obtained through the evaluation of periapical and panoramic radiographs associated with the surgeon's tactile perception during milling and implant installation. Before implant installation, bone biopsies of standardized sizes were performed for histological evaluation. RESULTS: Type III bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (73.33%) and anterior (73.33%) maxilla, whereas type II bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (53.33%) and anterior (60.00%) mandible. Through histometry, statistical difference was observed for the amount of bone tissue of the posterior region of the maxilla in relation to the anterior and posterior regions of the mandible (P ≤ 0.043). However, there was no difference in osteocyte counts between alveolar regions (P = 0.2946). In the female gender, the age showed a low positive correlation with the L & Z classification (rho = 0.398; P = 0.006) and in the male gender, a moderate negative correlation was observed (rho = -0.650, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods detected differences in the bone quality of the alveolar regions of the maxilla/mandible and that the classification by L & Z is a reliable method, since it was consistent with histomorphometry, considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of bone quality and greater bone density was observed in older men.
id UNSP_bc825ec71c2381dd8faafc0ccc7adfb6
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229651
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb ClassificationOBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the bone quality of the maxilla and mandible by using the classification proposed by Lekholm and Zarb (L & Z) and histomorphometry. METHODS: Sixty edentulous areas were evaluated. The classification by L & Z was obtained through the evaluation of periapical and panoramic radiographs associated with the surgeon's tactile perception during milling and implant installation. Before implant installation, bone biopsies of standardized sizes were performed for histological evaluation. RESULTS: Type III bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (73.33%) and anterior (73.33%) maxilla, whereas type II bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (53.33%) and anterior (60.00%) mandible. Through histometry, statistical difference was observed for the amount of bone tissue of the posterior region of the maxilla in relation to the anterior and posterior regions of the mandible (P ≤ 0.043). However, there was no difference in osteocyte counts between alveolar regions (P = 0.2946). In the female gender, the age showed a low positive correlation with the L & Z classification (rho = 0.398; P = 0.006) and in the male gender, a moderate negative correlation was observed (rho = -0.650, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods detected differences in the bone quality of the alveolar regions of the maxilla/mandible and that the classification by L & Z is a reliable method, since it was consistent with histomorphometry, considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of bone quality and greater bone density was observed in older men.Diagnosis and Surgery Department Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (FOAr/UNESP)Pathology and Physiology Department Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (FOAr/UNESP)Diagnosis and Surgery Department Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (FOAr/UNESP)Pathology and Physiology Department Araraquara Dental School São Paulo State University (FOAr/UNESP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Oliveira, Marina Reis [UNESP]Gonçalves, Andréa [UNESP]Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini [UNESP]de Andrade, Cleverton Roberto [UNESP]Vieira, Eduardo Hochuli [UNESP]Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP]2022-04-29T08:34:58Z2022-04-29T08:34:58Z2021-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2114-2118http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007405The Journal of craniofacial surgery, v. 32, n. 6, p. 2114-2118, 2021.1536-3732http://hdl.handle.net/11449/22965110.1097/SCS.00000000000074052-s2.0-85116479409Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengThe Journal of craniofacial surgeryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T08:34:58Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/229651Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T14:31:02.923881Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
title Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
spellingShingle Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
Oliveira, Marina Reis [UNESP]
title_short Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
title_full Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
title_fullStr Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
title_sort Evaluation of Alveolar Bone Quality: Correlation Between Histomorphometric Analysis and Lekholm and Zarb Classification
author Oliveira, Marina Reis [UNESP]
author_facet Oliveira, Marina Reis [UNESP]
Gonçalves, Andréa [UNESP]
Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini [UNESP]
de Andrade, Cleverton Roberto [UNESP]
Vieira, Eduardo Hochuli [UNESP]
Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Gonçalves, Andréa [UNESP]
Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini [UNESP]
de Andrade, Cleverton Roberto [UNESP]
Vieira, Eduardo Hochuli [UNESP]
Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Marina Reis [UNESP]
Gonçalves, Andréa [UNESP]
Gabrielli, Marisa Aparecida Cabrini [UNESP]
de Andrade, Cleverton Roberto [UNESP]
Vieira, Eduardo Hochuli [UNESP]
Pereira-Filho, Valfrido Antonio [UNESP]
description OBJECTIVES: This study evaluated the bone quality of the maxilla and mandible by using the classification proposed by Lekholm and Zarb (L & Z) and histomorphometry. METHODS: Sixty edentulous areas were evaluated. The classification by L & Z was obtained through the evaluation of periapical and panoramic radiographs associated with the surgeon's tactile perception during milling and implant installation. Before implant installation, bone biopsies of standardized sizes were performed for histological evaluation. RESULTS: Type III bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (73.33%) and anterior (73.33%) maxilla, whereas type II bone quality was more frequent in the posterior (53.33%) and anterior (60.00%) mandible. Through histometry, statistical difference was observed for the amount of bone tissue of the posterior region of the maxilla in relation to the anterior and posterior regions of the mandible (P ≤ 0.043). However, there was no difference in osteocyte counts between alveolar regions (P = 0.2946). In the female gender, the age showed a low positive correlation with the L & Z classification (rho = 0.398; P = 0.006) and in the male gender, a moderate negative correlation was observed (rho = -0.650, P = 0.016). CONCLUSIONS: Both methods detected differences in the bone quality of the alveolar regions of the maxilla/mandible and that the classification by L & Z is a reliable method, since it was consistent with histomorphometry, considered the gold standard method for the evaluation of bone quality and greater bone density was observed in older men.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-09-01
2022-04-29T08:34:58Z
2022-04-29T08:34:58Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007405
The Journal of craniofacial surgery, v. 32, n. 6, p. 2114-2118, 2021.
1536-3732
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229651
10.1097/SCS.0000000000007405
2-s2.0-85116479409
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0000000000007405
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/229651
identifier_str_mv The Journal of craniofacial surgery, v. 32, n. 6, p. 2114-2118, 2021.
1536-3732
10.1097/SCS.0000000000007405
2-s2.0-85116479409
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv The Journal of craniofacial surgery
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 2114-2118
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128371902644224