Concessão de uso em Unidades de Conservação de proteção integral: um panorama sobre as possíveis implicações do PL 249/2013

• Autor(a) principal: Lopes, Fernanda Nogueira [UNESP]
• Data de Publicação: 2016
• Tipo de documento: Trabalho de conclusão de curso
• Idioma: por
• Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
• Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/11449/155798; http://www.athena.biblioteca.unesp.br/exlibris/bd/capelo/2017-08-24/000889692.pdf
• topic: Direito ambiental; Unidades de conservação; Áreas protegidas; Terras públicas; Madeira - Exploração; Biodiversidade - Conservação; Políticas públicas; Recursos naturais - Conservação; Brasil

The creation of Conservation Units (UC) is an important strategy for biodiversity protection, but without an integrated management with society, it is not enough to ensure the protection of natural resources and conservation of natural environments. Limitations in management by government agencies lie in the lack tools, resources and investments. In this context, the concession of areas of public use in these protected areas, already widely practiced in other countries, is practiced in Brazil without specific legislation. In 2013, the government of São Paulo State created a bill (PL) for this purpose. This study evaluates the implementation of previous legislation in Brazil on concession in UCs and verifies the implications of this PL, recently approved in the form of Law 16260/2016. The study was conducted through document analysis. 31 documents were analyzed, including academic papers, news, formal statements, legal documents, documents related to concessions and others. In addition to the concession of the areas of public use, this law also allows for the commercial exploitation of timber resources and forestry by-products in the areas provided for in the UC Management Plan (PM). The debate of the PL and approval of the law occurred without a broad discussion with society and it became clear, both through the media, and through legal demonstrations, discontentment of experts and environmentalists. But there is still the possibility of action of NGOs, prosecutors and other experts with technical and legal support in the preparation of reference terms, PMs, public contracts and audiences. In these steps there is room for attempts to eliminate the gaps and make sure concessions do not affect the biodiversity protection within Ucs, combined with public access