Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Oliveira, Joao Batista A. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Baruffi, Ricardo, Petersen, Claudia G. [UNESP], Mauri, Ana L., Cavagna, Mario, Franco, Jose G. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-107
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12254
Resumo: Background: The effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administered in the luteal phase remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the administration of a single-dose of GnRH-a in the luteal phase on ICSI clinical outcomes.Methods: The research strategy included the online search of databases. Only randomized studies were included. The outcomes analyzed were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio. In all trials, a single dose of GnRH-a was administered at day 5/6 after ICSI procedures.Results: All cycles presented statistically significantly higher rates of implantation (P < 0.0001), CPR per transfer (P = 0.006) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase GnRH-a administration than in the control group (without luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration). When meta-analysis was carried out only in trials that had used long GnRH-a ovarian stimulation protocol, CPR per transfer (P = 0.06) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.23) rates were not significantly different between the groups, but implantation rate was significant higher (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration. on the other hand, the results from trials that had used GnRH antagonist multi-dose ovarian stimulation protocol showed statistically significantly higher implantation (P = 0.0002), CPR per transfer (P = 0.04) and ongoing pregnancy rate (P = 0.04) in the luteal-phaseGnRH- a administration group. The majority of the results presented heterogeneity.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the luteal-phase single-dose GnRH-a administration can increase implantation rate in all cycles and CPR per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles with GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol. Nevertheless, by considering the heterogeneity between the trials, it seems premature to recommend the use of GnRH-a in the luteal phase. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary before evidence-based recommendations can be provided.
id UNSP_cd03e8b116cc25a09e71472ba8322bda
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/12254
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysisBackground: The effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administered in the luteal phase remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the administration of a single-dose of GnRH-a in the luteal phase on ICSI clinical outcomes.Methods: The research strategy included the online search of databases. Only randomized studies were included. The outcomes analyzed were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio. In all trials, a single dose of GnRH-a was administered at day 5/6 after ICSI procedures.Results: All cycles presented statistically significantly higher rates of implantation (P < 0.0001), CPR per transfer (P = 0.006) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase GnRH-a administration than in the control group (without luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration). When meta-analysis was carried out only in trials that had used long GnRH-a ovarian stimulation protocol, CPR per transfer (P = 0.06) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.23) rates were not significantly different between the groups, but implantation rate was significant higher (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration. on the other hand, the results from trials that had used GnRH antagonist multi-dose ovarian stimulation protocol showed statistically significantly higher implantation (P = 0.0002), CPR per transfer (P = 0.04) and ongoing pregnancy rate (P = 0.04) in the luteal-phaseGnRH- a administration group. The majority of the results presented heterogeneity.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the luteal-phase single-dose GnRH-a administration can increase implantation rate in all cycles and CPR per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles with GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol. Nevertheless, by considering the heterogeneity between the trials, it seems premature to recommend the use of GnRH-a in the luteal phase. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary before evidence-based recommendations can be provided.Univ Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, São Paulo, BrazilCtr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr, Ribeirao Preto, SP, BrazilPaulista Ctr Diag Res & Training, Ribeirao Preto, SP, BrazilUniv Estadual Paulista, Botucatu Med Sch, Dept Gynecol & Obstet, São Paulo, BrazilBiomed Central Ltd.Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Ctr Human Reprod Prof Franco JrPaulista Ctr Diag Res & TrainingOliveira, Joao Batista A. [UNESP]Baruffi, RicardoPetersen, Claudia G. [UNESP]Mauri, Ana L.Cavagna, MarioFranco, Jose G. [UNESP]2014-05-20T13:35:35Z2014-05-20T13:35:35Z2010-09-08info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article11application/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-107Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 8, p. 11, 2010.1477-7827http://hdl.handle.net/11449/1225410.1186/1477-7827-8-107WOS:000282557500001WOS000282557500001.pdfWeb of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengReproductive Biology and Endocrinology2.8521,203info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-08-16T14:07:08Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/12254Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-16T14:07:08Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
spellingShingle Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
Oliveira, Joao Batista A. [UNESP]
title_short Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_full Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_fullStr Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
title_sort Administration of single-dose GnRH agonist in the luteal phase in ICSI cycles: a meta-analysis
author Oliveira, Joao Batista A. [UNESP]
author_facet Oliveira, Joao Batista A. [UNESP]
Baruffi, Ricardo
Petersen, Claudia G. [UNESP]
Mauri, Ana L.
Cavagna, Mario
Franco, Jose G. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Baruffi, Ricardo
Petersen, Claudia G. [UNESP]
Mauri, Ana L.
Cavagna, Mario
Franco, Jose G. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Ctr Human Reprod Prof Franco Jr
Paulista Ctr Diag Res & Training
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Oliveira, Joao Batista A. [UNESP]
Baruffi, Ricardo
Petersen, Claudia G. [UNESP]
Mauri, Ana L.
Cavagna, Mario
Franco, Jose G. [UNESP]
description Background: The effects of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) administered in the luteal phase remains controversial. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of the administration of a single-dose of GnRH-a in the luteal phase on ICSI clinical outcomes.Methods: The research strategy included the online search of databases. Only randomized studies were included. The outcomes analyzed were implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate. The fixed effects model was used for odds ratio. In all trials, a single dose of GnRH-a was administered at day 5/6 after ICSI procedures.Results: All cycles presented statistically significantly higher rates of implantation (P < 0.0001), CPR per transfer (P = 0.006) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase GnRH-a administration than in the control group (without luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration). When meta-analysis was carried out only in trials that had used long GnRH-a ovarian stimulation protocol, CPR per transfer (P = 0.06) and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.23) rates were not significantly different between the groups, but implantation rate was significant higher (P = 0.02) in the group that received luteal-phase-GnRH-a administration. on the other hand, the results from trials that had used GnRH antagonist multi-dose ovarian stimulation protocol showed statistically significantly higher implantation (P = 0.0002), CPR per transfer (P = 0.04) and ongoing pregnancy rate (P = 0.04) in the luteal-phaseGnRH- a administration group. The majority of the results presented heterogeneity.Conclusions: These findings demonstrate that the luteal-phase single-dose GnRH-a administration can increase implantation rate in all cycles and CPR per transfer and ongoing pregnancy rate in cycles with GnRH antagonist ovarian stimulation protocol. Nevertheless, by considering the heterogeneity between the trials, it seems premature to recommend the use of GnRH-a in the luteal phase. Additional randomized controlled trials are necessary before evidence-based recommendations can be provided.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-09-08
2014-05-20T13:35:35Z
2014-05-20T13:35:35Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-107
Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 8, p. 11, 2010.
1477-7827
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12254
10.1186/1477-7827-8-107
WOS:000282557500001
WOS000282557500001.pdf
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7827-8-107
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/12254
identifier_str_mv Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology. London: Biomed Central Ltd., v. 8, p. 11, 2010.
1477-7827
10.1186/1477-7827-8-107
WOS:000282557500001
WOS000282557500001.pdf
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology
2.852
1,203
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 11
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd.
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biomed Central Ltd.
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128151410180096