Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng por |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n4p422 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232232 |
Resumo: | The aim of this study was to compare two strategies of walking test performance (self-paced intensity and fixed pace) for the determination of critical walking velocity (CWV) parameters. Fourteen female volunteers (age = 60.8 ± 10.3 years) were randomly submitted to three fixed-time walking tests (3, 6 and 9 minutes) and three fixed-pace tests ranging from 10 to 15 seconds at intervals of 20 meters. These predictive tests were used to calculate CWV. The mean standard error of the CWV estimate was 4.96% for the fixed-pace strategy, and 2.98% for the fixed-time strategy, corresponding to an adequate estimation. The results showed a high correlation between strategies (r=0.73; p<0.01). The mean coefficient of determination was R2 = 0.98 ± 0.03 for the fixed-pace model and R2 = 0.99 ± 0.002 for the self-paced model. ANCOVA for the predictive tests showed no differences between strategies (p=0.29), subjects x strategies (p=0.29), or strategies x time (p=0.26). Geometric regression comparing the fixed-time x fixedpace strategies (1.42 ± 0.14 and 1.38 ± 0.21 m/s) or the Bland-Altman method revealed no differences between performance strategies. We conclude that the two strategies were equivalent for the evaluation of performance in the sample studied. |
id |
UNSP_dd0422caadd752d8a222a3233906a9a8 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232232 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhadaComparison of two strategies for assessing critical walking velocityAnaerobic theresholdAthletic performanceEvaluationWomenThe aim of this study was to compare two strategies of walking test performance (self-paced intensity and fixed pace) for the determination of critical walking velocity (CWV) parameters. Fourteen female volunteers (age = 60.8 ± 10.3 years) were randomly submitted to three fixed-time walking tests (3, 6 and 9 minutes) and three fixed-pace tests ranging from 10 to 15 seconds at intervals of 20 meters. These predictive tests were used to calculate CWV. The mean standard error of the CWV estimate was 4.96% for the fixed-pace strategy, and 2.98% for the fixed-time strategy, corresponding to an adequate estimation. The results showed a high correlation between strategies (r=0.73; p<0.01). The mean coefficient of determination was R2 = 0.98 ± 0.03 for the fixed-pace model and R2 = 0.99 ± 0.002 for the self-paced model. ANCOVA for the predictive tests showed no differences between strategies (p=0.29), subjects x strategies (p=0.29), or strategies x time (p=0.26). Geometric regression comparing the fixed-time x fixedpace strategies (1.42 ± 0.14 and 1.38 ± 0.21 m/s) or the Bland-Altman method revealed no differences between performance strategies. We conclude that the two strategies were equivalent for the evaluation of performance in the sample studied.Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Pelotas, RSUniversidade Estadual Paulista Campus de Rio Claro, Rio Claro, SPUniversidade Estadual Paulista Campus de Rio Claro, Rio Claro, SPUniversidade Federal de PelotasUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Corrêa, Leandro QuadroRombaldi, Airton JoséKokubun, Eduardo [UNESP]Ribeiro, Paula Aver Bretanha [UNESP]2022-04-29T09:23:54Z2022-04-29T09:23:54Z2009-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article422-427http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n4p422Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, v. 11, n. 4, p. 422-427, 2009.1415-84261980-0037http://hdl.handle.net/11449/23223210.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n4p4222-s2.0-84893823010Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengporRevista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humanoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-04-29T09:23:54Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/232232Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T16:21:36.284837Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada Comparison of two strategies for assessing critical walking velocity |
title |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada |
spellingShingle |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada Corrêa, Leandro Quadro Anaerobic thereshold Athletic performance Evaluation Women |
title_short |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada |
title_full |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada |
title_fullStr |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada |
title_sort |
Comparação de duas estratégias de desempenho para avaliação da velocidade crítica de caminhada |
author |
Corrêa, Leandro Quadro |
author_facet |
Corrêa, Leandro Quadro Rombaldi, Airton José Kokubun, Eduardo [UNESP] Ribeiro, Paula Aver Bretanha [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Rombaldi, Airton José Kokubun, Eduardo [UNESP] Ribeiro, Paula Aver Bretanha [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Pelotas Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Corrêa, Leandro Quadro Rombaldi, Airton José Kokubun, Eduardo [UNESP] Ribeiro, Paula Aver Bretanha [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Anaerobic thereshold Athletic performance Evaluation Women |
topic |
Anaerobic thereshold Athletic performance Evaluation Women |
description |
The aim of this study was to compare two strategies of walking test performance (self-paced intensity and fixed pace) for the determination of critical walking velocity (CWV) parameters. Fourteen female volunteers (age = 60.8 ± 10.3 years) were randomly submitted to three fixed-time walking tests (3, 6 and 9 minutes) and three fixed-pace tests ranging from 10 to 15 seconds at intervals of 20 meters. These predictive tests were used to calculate CWV. The mean standard error of the CWV estimate was 4.96% for the fixed-pace strategy, and 2.98% for the fixed-time strategy, corresponding to an adequate estimation. The results showed a high correlation between strategies (r=0.73; p<0.01). The mean coefficient of determination was R2 = 0.98 ± 0.03 for the fixed-pace model and R2 = 0.99 ± 0.002 for the self-paced model. ANCOVA for the predictive tests showed no differences between strategies (p=0.29), subjects x strategies (p=0.29), or strategies x time (p=0.26). Geometric regression comparing the fixed-time x fixedpace strategies (1.42 ± 0.14 and 1.38 ± 0.21 m/s) or the Bland-Altman method revealed no differences between performance strategies. We conclude that the two strategies were equivalent for the evaluation of performance in the sample studied. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-12-01 2022-04-29T09:23:54Z 2022-04-29T09:23:54Z |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n4p422 Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, v. 11, n. 4, p. 422-427, 2009. 1415-8426 1980-0037 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232232 10.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n4p422 2-s2.0-84893823010 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n4p422 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/232232 |
identifier_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano, v. 11, n. 4, p. 422-427, 2009. 1415-8426 1980-0037 10.5007/1980-0037.2009v11n4p422 2-s2.0-84893823010 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng por |
language |
eng por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Cineantropometria e Desempenho Humano |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
422-427 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128636677521408 |