United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2020 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195572 |
Resumo: | Coalition formation is considered an important tool to leverage bargaining power in GATT/WTO negotiations. While most of the literature has focused on developing countries, we show that sizable economies are the primary users of coalitions at the GATT/WTO. We also find evidence that middle powers do not exhibit distinctive collectivist behavior at the WTO. There is a linear and strong relationship between countries' economic power-measured as real GDP-and coalition participation within the GATT/WTO system. We explain these results, presenting evidence that large economies-countries that have greater trade negotiations power-join coalitions more often because they are better equipped to absorb transaction costs and more prepared to deal with the uncertainty of WTO negotiations. We also found a relationship between coalition entry and trade openness, with countries more open to trade joining coalitions more often. |
id |
UNSP_e7ad154e9c7052c7cca55c11ded4b0db |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195572 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiationsWorld Trade Organizationtrade coalitionseconomic powerinternational trade negotiationsdemocracyCoalition formation is considered an important tool to leverage bargaining power in GATT/WTO negotiations. While most of the literature has focused on developing countries, we show that sizable economies are the primary users of coalitions at the GATT/WTO. We also find evidence that middle powers do not exhibit distinctive collectivist behavior at the WTO. There is a linear and strong relationship between countries' economic power-measured as real GDP-and coalition participation within the GATT/WTO system. We explain these results, presenting evidence that large economies-countries that have greater trade negotiations power-join coalitions more often because they are better equipped to absorb transaction costs and more prepared to deal with the uncertainty of WTO negotiations. We also found a relationship between coalition entry and trade openness, with countries more open to trade joining coalitions more often.Sao Paulo State Univ, Sao Paulo, BrazilFed Univ ABC, Publ Policy, Santo Andre, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sao Paulo, BrazilSage Publications LtdUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP]Fernandes, Ivan Filipe2020-12-10T17:39:10Z2020-12-10T17:39:10Z2020-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article17http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738International Political Science Review. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 17 p., 2020.0192-5121http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19557210.1177/0192512120940738WOS:000556850900001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Political Science Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T09:55:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195572Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:07:45.938375Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations |
title |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations |
spellingShingle |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP] World Trade Organization trade coalitions economic power international trade negotiations democracy |
title_short |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations |
title_full |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations |
title_fullStr |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations |
title_full_unstemmed |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations |
title_sort |
United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations |
author |
Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP] Fernandes, Ivan Filipe |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Fernandes, Ivan Filipe |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC) |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP] Fernandes, Ivan Filipe |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
World Trade Organization trade coalitions economic power international trade negotiations democracy |
topic |
World Trade Organization trade coalitions economic power international trade negotiations democracy |
description |
Coalition formation is considered an important tool to leverage bargaining power in GATT/WTO negotiations. While most of the literature has focused on developing countries, we show that sizable economies are the primary users of coalitions at the GATT/WTO. We also find evidence that middle powers do not exhibit distinctive collectivist behavior at the WTO. There is a linear and strong relationship between countries' economic power-measured as real GDP-and coalition participation within the GATT/WTO system. We explain these results, presenting evidence that large economies-countries that have greater trade negotiations power-join coalitions more often because they are better equipped to absorb transaction costs and more prepared to deal with the uncertainty of WTO negotiations. We also found a relationship between coalition entry and trade openness, with countries more open to trade joining coalitions more often. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-10T17:39:10Z 2020-12-10T17:39:10Z 2020-08-06 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738 International Political Science Review. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 17 p., 2020. 0192-5121 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195572 10.1177/0192512120940738 WOS:000556850900001 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195572 |
identifier_str_mv |
International Political Science Review. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 17 p., 2020. 0192-5121 10.1177/0192512120940738 WOS:000556850900001 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Political Science Review |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
17 |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sage Publications Ltd |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sage Publications Ltd |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Web of Science reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808129587922599936 |