United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2020
Outros Autores: Fernandes, Ivan Filipe
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195572
Resumo: Coalition formation is considered an important tool to leverage bargaining power in GATT/WTO negotiations. While most of the literature has focused on developing countries, we show that sizable economies are the primary users of coalitions at the GATT/WTO. We also find evidence that middle powers do not exhibit distinctive collectivist behavior at the WTO. There is a linear and strong relationship between countries' economic power-measured as real GDP-and coalition participation within the GATT/WTO system. We explain these results, presenting evidence that large economies-countries that have greater trade negotiations power-join coalitions more often because they are better equipped to absorb transaction costs and more prepared to deal with the uncertainty of WTO negotiations. We also found a relationship between coalition entry and trade openness, with countries more open to trade joining coalitions more often.
id UNSP_e7ad154e9c7052c7cca55c11ded4b0db
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195572
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiationsWorld Trade Organizationtrade coalitionseconomic powerinternational trade negotiationsdemocracyCoalition formation is considered an important tool to leverage bargaining power in GATT/WTO negotiations. While most of the literature has focused on developing countries, we show that sizable economies are the primary users of coalitions at the GATT/WTO. We also find evidence that middle powers do not exhibit distinctive collectivist behavior at the WTO. There is a linear and strong relationship between countries' economic power-measured as real GDP-and coalition participation within the GATT/WTO system. We explain these results, presenting evidence that large economies-countries that have greater trade negotiations power-join coalitions more often because they are better equipped to absorb transaction costs and more prepared to deal with the uncertainty of WTO negotiations. We also found a relationship between coalition entry and trade openness, with countries more open to trade joining coalitions more often.Sao Paulo State Univ, Sao Paulo, BrazilFed Univ ABC, Publ Policy, Santo Andre, SP, BrazilSao Paulo State Univ, Sao Paulo, BrazilSage Publications LtdUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP]Fernandes, Ivan Filipe2020-12-10T17:39:10Z2020-12-10T17:39:10Z2020-08-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article17http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738International Political Science Review. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 17 p., 2020.0192-5121http://hdl.handle.net/11449/19557210.1177/0192512120940738WOS:000556850900001Web of Sciencereponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengInternational Political Science Reviewinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T09:55:11Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/195572Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-06T00:07:45.938375Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
title United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
spellingShingle United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP]
World Trade Organization
trade coalitions
economic power
international trade negotiations
democracy
title_short United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
title_full United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
title_fullStr United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
title_full_unstemmed United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
title_sort United we stand and divided we fall: Coalitions in the GATT/WTO negotiations
author Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP]
author_facet Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP]
Fernandes, Ivan Filipe
author_role author
author2 Fernandes, Ivan Filipe
author2_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidade Federal do ABC (UFABC)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cepaluni, Gabriel [UNESP]
Fernandes, Ivan Filipe
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv World Trade Organization
trade coalitions
economic power
international trade negotiations
democracy
topic World Trade Organization
trade coalitions
economic power
international trade negotiations
democracy
description Coalition formation is considered an important tool to leverage bargaining power in GATT/WTO negotiations. While most of the literature has focused on developing countries, we show that sizable economies are the primary users of coalitions at the GATT/WTO. We also find evidence that middle powers do not exhibit distinctive collectivist behavior at the WTO. There is a linear and strong relationship between countries' economic power-measured as real GDP-and coalition participation within the GATT/WTO system. We explain these results, presenting evidence that large economies-countries that have greater trade negotiations power-join coalitions more often because they are better equipped to absorb transaction costs and more prepared to deal with the uncertainty of WTO negotiations. We also found a relationship between coalition entry and trade openness, with countries more open to trade joining coalitions more often.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-10T17:39:10Z
2020-12-10T17:39:10Z
2020-08-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738
International Political Science Review. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 17 p., 2020.
0192-5121
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195572
10.1177/0192512120940738
WOS:000556850900001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0192512120940738
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/195572
identifier_str_mv International Political Science Review. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 17 p., 2020.
0192-5121
10.1177/0192512120940738
WOS:000556850900001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv International Political Science Review
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 17
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage Publications Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sage Publications Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Web of Science
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129587922599936