Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Michelon, Thomas Bruno, Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar [UNESP], Han, Heping, Yu, Qin, Powles, Stephen B., Vila-Aiub, Martin M.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.7096
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240652
Resumo: BACKGROUND: Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. (goosegrass) is a major weed in global cropping systems. It has evolved resistance to glyphosate due to single Pro-106-Ser (P106S) or double Thr-102-Ile + Pro-106-Ser (TIPS) EPSPS target site mutations. Here, experiments were conducted to evaluate the single effect of soybean competition and its combined effect with a glyphosate field dose (1080 g ae ha−1) on the growth and fitness of plants carrying these glyphosate resistance endowing target site mutations. RESULTS: TIPS E. indica plants are highly glyphosate-resistant but the double mutation endows a substantial fitness cost. The TIPS fitness penalty increased under the effect of soybean competition resulting in a cost of 95%, 95% and 96% in terms of, respectively, vegetative growth, seed mass and seed number investment. Glyphosate treatment of these glyphosate-resistant TIPS plants showed an increase in growth relative to those without glyphosate. Conversely, for the P106S moderate glyphosate resistance mutation, glyphosate treatment alone reduced survival rate, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass (34%), seed mass (48%) and number (52%) of P106S plants relative to the glyphosate nontreated plants. However, under the combined effects of both soybean competition and the field-recommended glyphosate dose, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass, seed mass and number of P106S and TIPS plants were substantially limited (by ≤99%). CONCLUSION: The ecological environment imposed by intense competition from a soybean crop sets a significant constraint for the landscape-level increase of both the E. indica single and double glyphosate resistance mutations in the agroecosystem and highlights the key role of crop competition in limiting the population growth of weeds, whether they are herbicide-resistant or susceptible. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.
id UNSP_e8b0da38c82907836c0b18aac4b77a72
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240652
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for managementfitnessgoosegrassherbicide resistancesoybeanBACKGROUND: Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. (goosegrass) is a major weed in global cropping systems. It has evolved resistance to glyphosate due to single Pro-106-Ser (P106S) or double Thr-102-Ile + Pro-106-Ser (TIPS) EPSPS target site mutations. Here, experiments were conducted to evaluate the single effect of soybean competition and its combined effect with a glyphosate field dose (1080 g ae ha−1) on the growth and fitness of plants carrying these glyphosate resistance endowing target site mutations. RESULTS: TIPS E. indica plants are highly glyphosate-resistant but the double mutation endows a substantial fitness cost. The TIPS fitness penalty increased under the effect of soybean competition resulting in a cost of 95%, 95% and 96% in terms of, respectively, vegetative growth, seed mass and seed number investment. Glyphosate treatment of these glyphosate-resistant TIPS plants showed an increase in growth relative to those without glyphosate. Conversely, for the P106S moderate glyphosate resistance mutation, glyphosate treatment alone reduced survival rate, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass (34%), seed mass (48%) and number (52%) of P106S plants relative to the glyphosate nontreated plants. However, under the combined effects of both soybean competition and the field-recommended glyphosate dose, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass, seed mass and number of P106S and TIPS plants were substantially limited (by ≤99%). CONCLUSION: The ecological environment imposed by intense competition from a soybean crop sets a significant constraint for the landscape-level increase of both the E. indica single and double glyphosate resistance mutations in the agroecosystem and highlights the key role of crop competition in limiting the population growth of weeds, whether they are herbicide-resistant or susceptible. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.Department of Plant Protection Federal University of ParanáDepartment of Biology Applied in Agriculture São Paulo State UniversityAustralian Herbicide Resistance Initiative (AHRI) - School of Agriculture & Environment University of Western Australia (UWA)IFEVA - CONICET – Faculty of Agronomy Department of Ecology University of Buenos Aires (UBA)Department of Biology Applied in Agriculture São Paulo State UniversityFederal University of ParanáUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)University of Western Australia (UWA)University of Buenos Aires (UBA)Barroso, Arthur Arrobas MartinsMichelon, Thomas BrunoAlves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]Han, HepingYu, QinPowles, Stephen B.Vila-Aiub, Martin M.2023-03-01T20:26:52Z2023-03-01T20:26:52Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.7096Pest Management Science.1526-49981526-498Xhttp://hdl.handle.net/11449/24065210.1002/ps.70962-s2.0-85135985721Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengPest Management Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:26:52Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240652Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:44:07.993631Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
title Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
spellingShingle Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
fitness
goosegrass
herbicide resistance
soybean
title_short Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
title_full Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
title_fullStr Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
title_full_unstemmed Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
title_sort Challenging glyphosate resistance EPSPS P106S and TIPS mutations with soybean competition and glyphosate: implications for management
author Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
author_facet Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
Michelon, Thomas Bruno
Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]
Han, Heping
Yu, Qin
Powles, Stephen B.
Vila-Aiub, Martin M.
author_role author
author2 Michelon, Thomas Bruno
Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]
Han, Heping
Yu, Qin
Powles, Stephen B.
Vila-Aiub, Martin M.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Federal University of Paraná
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
University of Western Australia (UWA)
University of Buenos Aires (UBA)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Barroso, Arthur Arrobas Martins
Michelon, Thomas Bruno
Alves, Pedro Luis da Costa Aguiar [UNESP]
Han, Heping
Yu, Qin
Powles, Stephen B.
Vila-Aiub, Martin M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv fitness
goosegrass
herbicide resistance
soybean
topic fitness
goosegrass
herbicide resistance
soybean
description BACKGROUND: Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. (goosegrass) is a major weed in global cropping systems. It has evolved resistance to glyphosate due to single Pro-106-Ser (P106S) or double Thr-102-Ile + Pro-106-Ser (TIPS) EPSPS target site mutations. Here, experiments were conducted to evaluate the single effect of soybean competition and its combined effect with a glyphosate field dose (1080 g ae ha−1) on the growth and fitness of plants carrying these glyphosate resistance endowing target site mutations. RESULTS: TIPS E. indica plants are highly glyphosate-resistant but the double mutation endows a substantial fitness cost. The TIPS fitness penalty increased under the effect of soybean competition resulting in a cost of 95%, 95% and 96% in terms of, respectively, vegetative growth, seed mass and seed number investment. Glyphosate treatment of these glyphosate-resistant TIPS plants showed an increase in growth relative to those without glyphosate. Conversely, for the P106S moderate glyphosate resistance mutation, glyphosate treatment alone reduced survival rate, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass (34%), seed mass (48%) and number (52%) of P106S plants relative to the glyphosate nontreated plants. However, under the combined effects of both soybean competition and the field-recommended glyphosate dose, vegetative growth, aboveground biomass, seed mass and number of P106S and TIPS plants were substantially limited (by ≤99%). CONCLUSION: The ecological environment imposed by intense competition from a soybean crop sets a significant constraint for the landscape-level increase of both the E. indica single and double glyphosate resistance mutations in the agroecosystem and highlights the key role of crop competition in limiting the population growth of weeds, whether they are herbicide-resistant or susceptible. © 2022 Society of Chemical Industry.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-01T20:26:52Z
2023-03-01T20:26:52Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.7096
Pest Management Science.
1526-4998
1526-498X
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240652
10.1002/ps.7096
2-s2.0-85135985721
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ps.7096
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240652
identifier_str_mv Pest Management Science.
1526-4998
1526-498X
10.1002/ps.7096
2-s2.0-85135985721
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Pest Management Science
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129352235220992