Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
Texto Completo: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208724 |
Resumo: | Premise: Flower color is a primary pollinator attractant and generally adjusted to the cognitive system of the pollinators. The perception of flower color depends on the visual system of pollinators and also on environmental factors such as light conditions and the background against which flowers are displayed. Methods: Using bee-pollinated Fabaceae species as a model, we analyzed flower color diversity and compared flower color signals considering both the standard green and the natural leaf background of two tropical seasonally dry vegetations—a mountain rupestrian grassland (campo rupestre) and a woody savanna (cerrado)—compared to a nontropical Mediterranean shrubland. Results: By using natural background, bees discriminated color for 58% of the flowers in the campo rupestre and for only 43% in cerrado. Both vegetations were surpassed by 75% of bee color discrimination in Mediterranean vegetation. Chromatic contrast and purity were similar among the three vegetation types. Green contrast and brightness were similar between the tropical vegetations but differed from the Mediterranean shrubland. Green contrast differences were lost when using a standard green background, and most variables (purity, green contrast, and brightness) differed according to the background (natural or standard green) in all vegetations. Conclusions: The natural background influenced bee perception of flower color regardless of vegetation. The background of the campo rupestre promoted green contrast for flowers, ensuring flower detection by pollinators and, along with bees, may also act as a selective pressure driving the diversity of flower colors in Fabaceae species. We highlight the importance of considering the natural background coloration when analyzing flower color signals. |
id |
UNSP_e9e7de7bd6eb39d210ca81cdbbb8f578 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208724 |
network_acronym_str |
UNSP |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
2946 |
spelling |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf backgroundApis melliferaFabaceaeflower color diversityplant–pollinator interactionspollinationreflectance spectraseasonally dry vegetationvisual systemPremise: Flower color is a primary pollinator attractant and generally adjusted to the cognitive system of the pollinators. The perception of flower color depends on the visual system of pollinators and also on environmental factors such as light conditions and the background against which flowers are displayed. Methods: Using bee-pollinated Fabaceae species as a model, we analyzed flower color diversity and compared flower color signals considering both the standard green and the natural leaf background of two tropical seasonally dry vegetations—a mountain rupestrian grassland (campo rupestre) and a woody savanna (cerrado)—compared to a nontropical Mediterranean shrubland. Results: By using natural background, bees discriminated color for 58% of the flowers in the campo rupestre and for only 43% in cerrado. Both vegetations were surpassed by 75% of bee color discrimination in Mediterranean vegetation. Chromatic contrast and purity were similar among the three vegetation types. Green contrast and brightness were similar between the tropical vegetations but differed from the Mediterranean shrubland. Green contrast differences were lost when using a standard green background, and most variables (purity, green contrast, and brightness) differed according to the background (natural or standard green) in all vegetations. Conclusions: The natural background influenced bee perception of flower color regardless of vegetation. The background of the campo rupestre promoted green contrast for flowers, ensuring flower detection by pollinators and, along with bees, may also act as a selective pressure driving the diversity of flower colors in Fabaceae species. We highlight the importance of considering the natural background coloration when analyzing flower color signals.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)European Regional Development FundDepartment of Biodiversity Phenology Lab São Paulo State University (UNESP) Biosciences Institute, Av 24A, 1515Department of Plant Biology and Ecology Universidad de SevillaDepartment of Biodiversity Phenology Lab São Paulo State University (UNESP) Biosciences Institute, Av 24A, 1515CNPq: #161293/2015-8CNPq: #311820/2018-2CNPq: #400717/2013-1CAPES: 001CNPq: 140534/2020-2European Regional Development Fund: 417RT0527Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidad de SevillaMartins, Amanda E. [UNESP]Arista, MontserratMorellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP]Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:17:57Z2021-06-25T11:17:57Z2021-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article788-797http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656American Journal of Botany, v. 108, n. 5, p. 788-797, 2021.1537-21970002-9122http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20872410.1002/ajb2.16562-s2.0-85106979262Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Journal of Botanyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T19:02:27Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208724Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:53:17.930799Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background |
title |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background |
spellingShingle |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP] Apis mellifera Fabaceae flower color diversity plant–pollinator interactions pollination reflectance spectra seasonally dry vegetation visual system |
title_short |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background |
title_full |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background |
title_fullStr |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background |
title_full_unstemmed |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background |
title_sort |
Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background |
author |
Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP] |
author_facet |
Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP] Arista, Montserrat Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP] Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP] |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Arista, Montserrat Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP] Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP] |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) Universidad de Sevilla |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP] Arista, Montserrat Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP] Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP] |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Apis mellifera Fabaceae flower color diversity plant–pollinator interactions pollination reflectance spectra seasonally dry vegetation visual system |
topic |
Apis mellifera Fabaceae flower color diversity plant–pollinator interactions pollination reflectance spectra seasonally dry vegetation visual system |
description |
Premise: Flower color is a primary pollinator attractant and generally adjusted to the cognitive system of the pollinators. The perception of flower color depends on the visual system of pollinators and also on environmental factors such as light conditions and the background against which flowers are displayed. Methods: Using bee-pollinated Fabaceae species as a model, we analyzed flower color diversity and compared flower color signals considering both the standard green and the natural leaf background of two tropical seasonally dry vegetations—a mountain rupestrian grassland (campo rupestre) and a woody savanna (cerrado)—compared to a nontropical Mediterranean shrubland. Results: By using natural background, bees discriminated color for 58% of the flowers in the campo rupestre and for only 43% in cerrado. Both vegetations were surpassed by 75% of bee color discrimination in Mediterranean vegetation. Chromatic contrast and purity were similar among the three vegetation types. Green contrast and brightness were similar between the tropical vegetations but differed from the Mediterranean shrubland. Green contrast differences were lost when using a standard green background, and most variables (purity, green contrast, and brightness) differed according to the background (natural or standard green) in all vegetations. Conclusions: The natural background influenced bee perception of flower color regardless of vegetation. The background of the campo rupestre promoted green contrast for flowers, ensuring flower detection by pollinators and, along with bees, may also act as a selective pressure driving the diversity of flower colors in Fabaceae species. We highlight the importance of considering the natural background coloration when analyzing flower color signals. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-06-25T11:17:57Z 2021-06-25T11:17:57Z 2021-05-01 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656 American Journal of Botany, v. 108, n. 5, p. 788-797, 2021. 1537-2197 0002-9122 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208724 10.1002/ajb2.1656 2-s2.0-85106979262 |
url |
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656 http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208724 |
identifier_str_mv |
American Journal of Botany, v. 108, n. 5, p. 788-797, 2021. 1537-2197 0002-9122 10.1002/ajb2.1656 2-s2.0-85106979262 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
American Journal of Botany |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
788-797 |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Scopus reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1808128871485145088 |