Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Arista, Montserrat, Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP], Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208724
Resumo: Premise: Flower color is a primary pollinator attractant and generally adjusted to the cognitive system of the pollinators. The perception of flower color depends on the visual system of pollinators and also on environmental factors such as light conditions and the background against which flowers are displayed. Methods: Using bee-pollinated Fabaceae species as a model, we analyzed flower color diversity and compared flower color signals considering both the standard green and the natural leaf background of two tropical seasonally dry vegetations—a mountain rupestrian grassland (campo rupestre) and a woody savanna (cerrado)—compared to a nontropical Mediterranean shrubland. Results: By using natural background, bees discriminated color for 58% of the flowers in the campo rupestre and for only 43% in cerrado. Both vegetations were surpassed by 75% of bee color discrimination in Mediterranean vegetation. Chromatic contrast and purity were similar among the three vegetation types. Green contrast and brightness were similar between the tropical vegetations but differed from the Mediterranean shrubland. Green contrast differences were lost when using a standard green background, and most variables (purity, green contrast, and brightness) differed according to the background (natural or standard green) in all vegetations. Conclusions: The natural background influenced bee perception of flower color regardless of vegetation. The background of the campo rupestre promoted green contrast for flowers, ensuring flower detection by pollinators and, along with bees, may also act as a selective pressure driving the diversity of flower colors in Fabaceae species. We highlight the importance of considering the natural background coloration when analyzing flower color signals.
id UNSP_e9e7de7bd6eb39d210ca81cdbbb8f578
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208724
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf backgroundApis melliferaFabaceaeflower color diversityplant–pollinator interactionspollinationreflectance spectraseasonally dry vegetationvisual systemPremise: Flower color is a primary pollinator attractant and generally adjusted to the cognitive system of the pollinators. The perception of flower color depends on the visual system of pollinators and also on environmental factors such as light conditions and the background against which flowers are displayed. Methods: Using bee-pollinated Fabaceae species as a model, we analyzed flower color diversity and compared flower color signals considering both the standard green and the natural leaf background of two tropical seasonally dry vegetations—a mountain rupestrian grassland (campo rupestre) and a woody savanna (cerrado)—compared to a nontropical Mediterranean shrubland. Results: By using natural background, bees discriminated color for 58% of the flowers in the campo rupestre and for only 43% in cerrado. Both vegetations were surpassed by 75% of bee color discrimination in Mediterranean vegetation. Chromatic contrast and purity were similar among the three vegetation types. Green contrast and brightness were similar between the tropical vegetations but differed from the Mediterranean shrubland. Green contrast differences were lost when using a standard green background, and most variables (purity, green contrast, and brightness) differed according to the background (natural or standard green) in all vegetations. Conclusions: The natural background influenced bee perception of flower color regardless of vegetation. The background of the campo rupestre promoted green contrast for flowers, ensuring flower detection by pollinators and, along with bees, may also act as a selective pressure driving the diversity of flower colors in Fabaceae species. We highlight the importance of considering the natural background coloration when analyzing flower color signals.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)European Regional Development FundDepartment of Biodiversity Phenology Lab São Paulo State University (UNESP) Biosciences Institute, Av 24A, 1515Department of Plant Biology and Ecology Universidad de SevillaDepartment of Biodiversity Phenology Lab São Paulo State University (UNESP) Biosciences Institute, Av 24A, 1515CNPq: #161293/2015-8CNPq: #311820/2018-2CNPq: #400717/2013-1CAPES: 001CNPq: 140534/2020-2European Regional Development Fund: 417RT0527Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Universidad de SevillaMartins, Amanda E. [UNESP]Arista, MontserratMorellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP]Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP]2021-06-25T11:17:57Z2021-06-25T11:17:57Z2021-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article788-797http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656American Journal of Botany, v. 108, n. 5, p. 788-797, 2021.1537-21970002-9122http://hdl.handle.net/11449/20872410.1002/ajb2.16562-s2.0-85106979262Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengAmerican Journal of Botanyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-23T19:02:27Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/208724Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:53:17.930799Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
title Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
spellingShingle Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP]
Apis mellifera
Fabaceae
flower color diversity
plant–pollinator interactions
pollination
reflectance spectra
seasonally dry vegetation
visual system
title_short Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
title_full Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
title_fullStr Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
title_full_unstemmed Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
title_sort Color signals of bee-pollinated flowers: the significance of natural leaf background
author Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP]
author_facet Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP]
Arista, Montserrat
Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP]
Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Arista, Montserrat
Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP]
Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
Universidad de Sevilla
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Martins, Amanda E. [UNESP]
Arista, Montserrat
Morellato, Leonor Patricia Cerdeira [UNESP]
Camargo, Maria Gabriela G. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Apis mellifera
Fabaceae
flower color diversity
plant–pollinator interactions
pollination
reflectance spectra
seasonally dry vegetation
visual system
topic Apis mellifera
Fabaceae
flower color diversity
plant–pollinator interactions
pollination
reflectance spectra
seasonally dry vegetation
visual system
description Premise: Flower color is a primary pollinator attractant and generally adjusted to the cognitive system of the pollinators. The perception of flower color depends on the visual system of pollinators and also on environmental factors such as light conditions and the background against which flowers are displayed. Methods: Using bee-pollinated Fabaceae species as a model, we analyzed flower color diversity and compared flower color signals considering both the standard green and the natural leaf background of two tropical seasonally dry vegetations—a mountain rupestrian grassland (campo rupestre) and a woody savanna (cerrado)—compared to a nontropical Mediterranean shrubland. Results: By using natural background, bees discriminated color for 58% of the flowers in the campo rupestre and for only 43% in cerrado. Both vegetations were surpassed by 75% of bee color discrimination in Mediterranean vegetation. Chromatic contrast and purity were similar among the three vegetation types. Green contrast and brightness were similar between the tropical vegetations but differed from the Mediterranean shrubland. Green contrast differences were lost when using a standard green background, and most variables (purity, green contrast, and brightness) differed according to the background (natural or standard green) in all vegetations. Conclusions: The natural background influenced bee perception of flower color regardless of vegetation. The background of the campo rupestre promoted green contrast for flowers, ensuring flower detection by pollinators and, along with bees, may also act as a selective pressure driving the diversity of flower colors in Fabaceae species. We highlight the importance of considering the natural background coloration when analyzing flower color signals.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-06-25T11:17:57Z
2021-06-25T11:17:57Z
2021-05-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656
American Journal of Botany, v. 108, n. 5, p. 788-797, 2021.
1537-2197
0002-9122
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208724
10.1002/ajb2.1656
2-s2.0-85106979262
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ajb2.1656
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/208724
identifier_str_mv American Journal of Botany, v. 108, n. 5, p. 788-797, 2021.
1537-2197
0002-9122
10.1002/ajb2.1656
2-s2.0-85106979262
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv American Journal of Botany
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 788-797
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128871485145088