Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Carvalho, Jean P. S.
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Yokoyama, Tadashi [UNESP], Mourão, Daniela C. [UNESP]
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10092-6
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/242080
Resumo: Let us consider the restricted three-body problem. Analysis of the orbital motion of a spacecraft around planets or moons is presented taking into account the nonsphericity of the primaries and the perturbations coming from a third body in an elliptical and inclined orbit. In the specific case of a spacecraft designed to explore a planet, moon or asteroid, it is noteworthy the increasing use of the averaging methods. This is a very powerful technique to simulate, very fast, the main effects caused by the disturbers on the dynamics of the spacecraft. In this work, we focus on the averaged methods applied in different conditions. Some comparisons are presented between the single-averaged, double-averaged models and the complete model, that is, the unaveraged model based on direct integration of the Cartesian (x, y, z) coordinates. This unaveraged model is quite necessary as it provides all the requirements to validate the performance and evaluate the usefulness of the averaged models for each specific problem. In the first part of this paper, we describe briefly some well-known techniques to obtain the averaged model considering the nonsphericity of the primary as well as the perturbation due to the third body. On the other hand, this is a opportunity to mention some misprints and typos problems, in the literature related to this subject. We compared the performance of single- and double-averaging models, keeping the x–y–z unaveraged model as the baseline of reference. The case of a high lunar orbit (Nie et al. in Celest Mech Dyn Astron 131(29):1–31, 2019) considering the perturbation of the Earth seems to be instructive. Single-average model is more accurate than the double-average model in the analysis of the eccentricity evolution, but in some cases of the inclination evolution, the three models agree and the average models are both very accurate. When comparing the results, eventual typos were detected in some works related to the literature of this subject. In the second part of this paper, we detached some aspects of the dynamics of a probe around Mercury (Sect. 5) involved in frozen orbit (FO) and in quasi-frozen orbit, (quasi-FO). Due to the interesting gravitational field of the planet and its proximity to the Sun, this is an important problem. Recently, many papers, not only on pure dynamics but on gravitational field of Mercury, have been published, according to references listed in this work. An exhaustive investigation on FO using double-averaging model was reported in Tresaco et al. (Celest Mech Dyn Astron 130(9):1–26, 2018). In this paper we revisit this problem, using x–y–z-model as a primary source of results. After a number of experiments, it was possible to use confidently the single averaging in many cases, for instance, in searching quasi-FO for Mercury planet. Although we do not include the effect of the radiation pressure, a number of our simulations can be compared with those given in Tresaco et al. (2018).
id UNSP_ea6fe9408c9983e04c04f8f5a7ae4c96
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/242080
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moonsAverage modelsFrozen orbitsOrbital perturbationsSpacecraftLet us consider the restricted three-body problem. Analysis of the orbital motion of a spacecraft around planets or moons is presented taking into account the nonsphericity of the primaries and the perturbations coming from a third body in an elliptical and inclined orbit. In the specific case of a spacecraft designed to explore a planet, moon or asteroid, it is noteworthy the increasing use of the averaging methods. This is a very powerful technique to simulate, very fast, the main effects caused by the disturbers on the dynamics of the spacecraft. In this work, we focus on the averaged methods applied in different conditions. Some comparisons are presented between the single-averaged, double-averaged models and the complete model, that is, the unaveraged model based on direct integration of the Cartesian (x, y, z) coordinates. This unaveraged model is quite necessary as it provides all the requirements to validate the performance and evaluate the usefulness of the averaged models for each specific problem. In the first part of this paper, we describe briefly some well-known techniques to obtain the averaged model considering the nonsphericity of the primary as well as the perturbation due to the third body. On the other hand, this is a opportunity to mention some misprints and typos problems, in the literature related to this subject. We compared the performance of single- and double-averaging models, keeping the x–y–z unaveraged model as the baseline of reference. The case of a high lunar orbit (Nie et al. in Celest Mech Dyn Astron 131(29):1–31, 2019) considering the perturbation of the Earth seems to be instructive. Single-average model is more accurate than the double-average model in the analysis of the eccentricity evolution, but in some cases of the inclination evolution, the three models agree and the average models are both very accurate. When comparing the results, eventual typos were detected in some works related to the literature of this subject. In the second part of this paper, we detached some aspects of the dynamics of a probe around Mercury (Sect. 5) involved in frozen orbit (FO) and in quasi-frozen orbit, (quasi-FO). Due to the interesting gravitational field of the planet and its proximity to the Sun, this is an important problem. Recently, many papers, not only on pure dynamics but on gravitational field of Mercury, have been published, according to references listed in this work. An exhaustive investigation on FO using double-averaging model was reported in Tresaco et al. (Celest Mech Dyn Astron 130(9):1–26, 2018). In this paper we revisit this problem, using x–y–z-model as a primary source of results. After a number of experiments, it was possible to use confidently the single averaging in many cases, for instance, in searching quasi-FO for Mercury planet. Although we do not include the effect of the radiation pressure, a number of our simulations can be compared with those given in Tresaco et al. (2018).Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)UFRB-Centro de Ciência e Tecnologia em Energia e Sustentabilidade Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia, BAUNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, SPUNESP- Univ Estadual Paulista, SPUNESP-Univ Estadual Paulista, SPUNESP- Univ Estadual Paulista, SPCNPq: 307724/2017-4CNPq: 420674/2016-0Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da BahiaUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Carvalho, Jean P. S.Yokoyama, Tadashi [UNESP]Mourão, Daniela C. [UNESP]2023-03-02T08:37:42Z2023-03-02T08:37:42Z2022-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10092-6Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, v. 134, n. 4, 2022.1572-94780923-2958http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24208010.1007/s10569-022-10092-62-s2.0-85134904232Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCelestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-02T08:37:42Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/242080Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T22:38:23.624340Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
title Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
spellingShingle Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
Carvalho, Jean P. S.
Average models
Frozen orbits
Orbital perturbations
Spacecraft
title_short Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
title_full Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
title_fullStr Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
title_full_unstemmed Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
title_sort Single-averaged model for analysis of frozen orbits around planets and moons
author Carvalho, Jean P. S.
author_facet Carvalho, Jean P. S.
Yokoyama, Tadashi [UNESP]
Mourão, Daniela C. [UNESP]
author_role author
author2 Yokoyama, Tadashi [UNESP]
Mourão, Daniela C. [UNESP]
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Carvalho, Jean P. S.
Yokoyama, Tadashi [UNESP]
Mourão, Daniela C. [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Average models
Frozen orbits
Orbital perturbations
Spacecraft
topic Average models
Frozen orbits
Orbital perturbations
Spacecraft
description Let us consider the restricted three-body problem. Analysis of the orbital motion of a spacecraft around planets or moons is presented taking into account the nonsphericity of the primaries and the perturbations coming from a third body in an elliptical and inclined orbit. In the specific case of a spacecraft designed to explore a planet, moon or asteroid, it is noteworthy the increasing use of the averaging methods. This is a very powerful technique to simulate, very fast, the main effects caused by the disturbers on the dynamics of the spacecraft. In this work, we focus on the averaged methods applied in different conditions. Some comparisons are presented between the single-averaged, double-averaged models and the complete model, that is, the unaveraged model based on direct integration of the Cartesian (x, y, z) coordinates. This unaveraged model is quite necessary as it provides all the requirements to validate the performance and evaluate the usefulness of the averaged models for each specific problem. In the first part of this paper, we describe briefly some well-known techniques to obtain the averaged model considering the nonsphericity of the primary as well as the perturbation due to the third body. On the other hand, this is a opportunity to mention some misprints and typos problems, in the literature related to this subject. We compared the performance of single- and double-averaging models, keeping the x–y–z unaveraged model as the baseline of reference. The case of a high lunar orbit (Nie et al. in Celest Mech Dyn Astron 131(29):1–31, 2019) considering the perturbation of the Earth seems to be instructive. Single-average model is more accurate than the double-average model in the analysis of the eccentricity evolution, but in some cases of the inclination evolution, the three models agree and the average models are both very accurate. When comparing the results, eventual typos were detected in some works related to the literature of this subject. In the second part of this paper, we detached some aspects of the dynamics of a probe around Mercury (Sect. 5) involved in frozen orbit (FO) and in quasi-frozen orbit, (quasi-FO). Due to the interesting gravitational field of the planet and its proximity to the Sun, this is an important problem. Recently, many papers, not only on pure dynamics but on gravitational field of Mercury, have been published, according to references listed in this work. An exhaustive investigation on FO using double-averaging model was reported in Tresaco et al. (Celest Mech Dyn Astron 130(9):1–26, 2018). In this paper we revisit this problem, using x–y–z-model as a primary source of results. After a number of experiments, it was possible to use confidently the single averaging in many cases, for instance, in searching quasi-FO for Mercury planet. Although we do not include the effect of the radiation pressure, a number of our simulations can be compared with those given in Tresaco et al. (2018).
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-08-01
2023-03-02T08:37:42Z
2023-03-02T08:37:42Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10092-6
Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, v. 134, n. 4, 2022.
1572-9478
0923-2958
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/242080
10.1007/s10569-022-10092-6
2-s2.0-85134904232
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10569-022-10092-6
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/242080
identifier_str_mv Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy, v. 134, n. 4, 2022.
1572-9478
0923-2958
10.1007/s10569-022-10092-6
2-s2.0-85134904232
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129445955895296