Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Neto, Benedito [UNESP]
Data de Publicação: 2022
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240375
Resumo: The mistaken view that Taylorism-Fordism characterizes the most advanced form of the capitalist labor process reinforces an equally mistaken view of the relationship between capitalism and technology, known as ‘criticism of the productive forces’, which was very much in evidence in critical thinking throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Based on an analysis of three articles by a representative author of contemporary Marxist reflections upon the labor process, David Spencer, we will endeavor to show that these misconceptions remain extremely current, leading to an attitude that can be characterized as ‘Marxism-Luddism’. Given this outlook, the post-capitalist notion of labor as a fulfilling and free activity can only be understood as a ‘social epiphany’. We attempt to supersede this ‘social epiphany’ by identifying the opportunities generated by capitalism, and, from there, point out the fundamental theoretical locus for the future relevance of the critique of capitalism.
id UNSP_eab031616fd6debc1852e28abe355381
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240375
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capitalcapitalismLabor processMarxismpost-capitalismproductive forcesThe mistaken view that Taylorism-Fordism characterizes the most advanced form of the capitalist labor process reinforces an equally mistaken view of the relationship between capitalism and technology, known as ‘criticism of the productive forces’, which was very much in evidence in critical thinking throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Based on an analysis of three articles by a representative author of contemporary Marxist reflections upon the labor process, David Spencer, we will endeavor to show that these misconceptions remain extremely current, leading to an attitude that can be characterized as ‘Marxism-Luddism’. Given this outlook, the post-capitalist notion of labor as a fulfilling and free activity can only be understood as a ‘social epiphany’. We attempt to supersede this ‘social epiphany’ by identifying the opportunities generated by capitalism, and, from there, point out the fundamental theoretical locus for the future relevance of the critique of capitalism.UNESP – São Paulo State UniversityUNESP – São Paulo State UniversityUniversidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)Neto, Benedito [UNESP]2023-03-01T20:14:21Z2023-03-01T20:14:21Z2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article155-166http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534Critique (United Kingdom), v. 50, n. 1, p. 155-166, 2022.1748-86050301-7605http://hdl.handle.net/11449/24037510.1080/03017605.2022.20505342-s2.0-85133231558Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengCritique (United Kingdom)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2023-03-01T20:14:21Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/240375Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T21:49:49.068756Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
title Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
spellingShingle Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
Neto, Benedito [UNESP]
capitalism
Labor process
Marxism
post-capitalism
productive forces
title_short Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
title_full Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
title_fullStr Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
title_full_unstemmed Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
title_sort Labor process and future relevance of the critique of capital
author Neto, Benedito [UNESP]
author_facet Neto, Benedito [UNESP]
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neto, Benedito [UNESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv capitalism
Labor process
Marxism
post-capitalism
productive forces
topic capitalism
Labor process
Marxism
post-capitalism
productive forces
description The mistaken view that Taylorism-Fordism characterizes the most advanced form of the capitalist labor process reinforces an equally mistaken view of the relationship between capitalism and technology, known as ‘criticism of the productive forces’, which was very much in evidence in critical thinking throughout the 1960s and 1970s. Based on an analysis of three articles by a representative author of contemporary Marxist reflections upon the labor process, David Spencer, we will endeavor to show that these misconceptions remain extremely current, leading to an attitude that can be characterized as ‘Marxism-Luddism’. Given this outlook, the post-capitalist notion of labor as a fulfilling and free activity can only be understood as a ‘social epiphany’. We attempt to supersede this ‘social epiphany’ by identifying the opportunities generated by capitalism, and, from there, point out the fundamental theoretical locus for the future relevance of the critique of capitalism.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
2023-03-01T20:14:21Z
2023-03-01T20:14:21Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534
Critique (United Kingdom), v. 50, n. 1, p. 155-166, 2022.
1748-8605
0301-7605
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240375
10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534
2-s2.0-85133231558
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/240375
identifier_str_mv Critique (United Kingdom), v. 50, n. 1, p. 155-166, 2022.
1748-8605
0301-7605
10.1080/03017605.2022.2050534
2-s2.0-85133231558
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Critique (United Kingdom)
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 155-166
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808129362948521984