Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP], Spadoto, Mariângela, Clarice Maria Rispoli, Botta, Azevedo, Eduardo Bessa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UNESP
Texto Completo: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189191
Resumo: This study aimed at comparing the performance of hydroxylation and direct photolysis for removing diclofenac from water. Several parameters were assessed: degradation kinetics, mineralization degree, lipophilicity (log D)of the identified initial intermediates, acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa), and chronic ecotoxicity predictions (ECOSAR 1.11). Hydroxylation was achieved by TiO2-assisted photodegradation. Direct photolysis experiments were performed in the same reaction system, but with no TiO2 addition. At least initially (up to 10 min), both processes followed a zero order kinetics, but direct photolysis was faster than hydroxylation: k = (1.4 ± 0.038)× 10−1 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.991)and (8.7 ± 0.29)× 10−2 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.996), respectively. No mineralization was observed up to 30 min. During TiO2-assisted photodegradation, only hydroxylated intermediates were detected. Direct photolysis proceeded via carbazoles formation. Only direct photolysis was capable of forming hydrophilic products (log D < 0). Acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa)showed that DCF toxicity was successfully removed and no additional ecotoxicity was produced by the degradation products. Chronic ecotoxicity predictions (fish, daphnids, and algae)showed that direct photolysis would produce less toxic substances. In summary, the results point out that direct photolysis is a better choice for removing diclofenac from water, in comparison to TiO2-induced hydroxylation.
id UNSP_efda6361127a63a6940974ffc1d3c48b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189191
network_acronym_str UNSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository_id_str 2946
spelling Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?AOPDiclofenacEcotoxicityLipophilicityPhotolysisTiO2This study aimed at comparing the performance of hydroxylation and direct photolysis for removing diclofenac from water. Several parameters were assessed: degradation kinetics, mineralization degree, lipophilicity (log D)of the identified initial intermediates, acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa), and chronic ecotoxicity predictions (ECOSAR 1.11). Hydroxylation was achieved by TiO2-assisted photodegradation. Direct photolysis experiments were performed in the same reaction system, but with no TiO2 addition. At least initially (up to 10 min), both processes followed a zero order kinetics, but direct photolysis was faster than hydroxylation: k = (1.4 ± 0.038)× 10−1 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.991)and (8.7 ± 0.29)× 10−2 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.996), respectively. No mineralization was observed up to 30 min. During TiO2-assisted photodegradation, only hydroxylated intermediates were detected. Direct photolysis proceeded via carbazoles formation. Only direct photolysis was capable of forming hydrophilic products (log D < 0). Acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa)showed that DCF toxicity was successfully removed and no additional ecotoxicity was produced by the degradation products. Chronic ecotoxicity predictions (fish, daphnids, and algae)showed that direct photolysis would produce less toxic substances. In summary, the results point out that direct photolysis is a better choice for removing diclofenac from water, in comparison to TiO2-induced hydroxylation.Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq)University of São Paulo Institute of Chemistry of São Carlos Laboratório de Desenvolvimento de Tecnologias Ambientais LDTAmb, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400, Centro, P. O. Box: 780UNESP Institute of Chemistry of Araraquara Analytical Chemistry Department NDCOM, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55, QuitandinhaUniversity of São Paulo São Carlos School of Engineering Centro de Ciências da Engenharia Aplicadas ao Meio Ambiente CCEAMA, Avenida Trabalhador São-Carlense, 400, Centro, P.O. Box: 292UNESP Institute of Chemistry of Araraquara Analytical Chemistry Department NDCOM, Rua Prof. Francisco Degni, 55, QuitandinhaUniversidade de São Paulo (USP)Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pintoda Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]Spadoto, MariângelaClarice Maria Rispoli, BottaAzevedo, Eduardo Bessa2019-10-06T16:32:52Z2019-10-06T16:32:52Z2019-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, v. 382.1010-6030http://hdl.handle.net/11449/18919110.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.1118792-s2.0-85066453928Scopusreponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESPengJournal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistryinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2021-10-22T21:16:12Zoai:repositorio.unesp.br:11449/189191Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://repositorio.unesp.br/oai/requestopendoar:29462024-08-05T17:12:06.455471Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
title Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
spellingShingle Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto
AOP
Diclofenac
Ecotoxicity
Lipophilicity
Photolysis
TiO2
title_short Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
title_full Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
title_fullStr Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
title_full_unstemmed Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
title_sort Which route to take for diclofenac removal from water: Hydroxylation or direct photolysis?
author Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto
author_facet Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto
da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]
Spadoto, Mariângela
Clarice Maria Rispoli, Botta
Azevedo, Eduardo Bessa
author_role author
author2 da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]
Spadoto, Mariângela
Clarice Maria Rispoli, Botta
Azevedo, Eduardo Bessa
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp)
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Leydy Katherine Ardila, Pinto
da Silva, Bianca Ferreira [UNESP]
Spadoto, Mariângela
Clarice Maria Rispoli, Botta
Azevedo, Eduardo Bessa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv AOP
Diclofenac
Ecotoxicity
Lipophilicity
Photolysis
TiO2
topic AOP
Diclofenac
Ecotoxicity
Lipophilicity
Photolysis
TiO2
description This study aimed at comparing the performance of hydroxylation and direct photolysis for removing diclofenac from water. Several parameters were assessed: degradation kinetics, mineralization degree, lipophilicity (log D)of the identified initial intermediates, acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa), and chronic ecotoxicity predictions (ECOSAR 1.11). Hydroxylation was achieved by TiO2-assisted photodegradation. Direct photolysis experiments were performed in the same reaction system, but with no TiO2 addition. At least initially (up to 10 min), both processes followed a zero order kinetics, but direct photolysis was faster than hydroxylation: k = (1.4 ± 0.038)× 10−1 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.991)and (8.7 ± 0.29)× 10−2 μg L−1 min−1 (R2 = 0.996), respectively. No mineralization was observed up to 30 min. During TiO2-assisted photodegradation, only hydroxylated intermediates were detected. Direct photolysis proceeded via carbazoles formation. Only direct photolysis was capable of forming hydrophilic products (log D < 0). Acute ecotoxicity analyses (Daphnia similis and Lactuca sativa)showed that DCF toxicity was successfully removed and no additional ecotoxicity was produced by the degradation products. Chronic ecotoxicity predictions (fish, daphnids, and algae)showed that direct photolysis would produce less toxic substances. In summary, the results point out that direct photolysis is a better choice for removing diclofenac from water, in comparison to TiO2-induced hydroxylation.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-10-06T16:32:52Z
2019-10-06T16:32:52Z
2019-09-01
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879
Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, v. 382.
1010-6030
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189191
10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879
2-s2.0-85066453928
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879
http://hdl.handle.net/11449/189191
identifier_str_mv Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry, v. 382.
1010-6030
10.1016/j.jphotochem.2019.111879
2-s2.0-85066453928
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology A: Chemistry
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Scopus
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNESP
instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron:UNESP
instname_str Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
instacron_str UNESP
institution UNESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1808128770241986560