Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Bastiani, Aline
Data de Publicação: 2019
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
Texto Completo: http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1850
Resumo: The native flora preservation of a region is closely linked to the intrinsic knowledge of the organisms which compose it. The correct identification of plant species and the determination of their ecological and reproductive needs are fundamental elements to promote efficient conservation strategies. Studies related to plant taxonomy are often based only on morphological characters, which makes it difficult to accurately interpret the taxonomic position of many species. In this sense, the analysis of the reproductive systems and the biology of the pollination serve as a subsidy to clarify possibly wrong hypotheses. The recent discovery of the plant species Sinningia lutea has caused divergences in the scientific environment, with a tendency to incorporate it to the present Sinningia allagophylla, although they have very different structural characteristics. Thus, the present study aimed to determine if Sinningia lutea and Sinningia allagophylla should, in fact, be considered distinct taxonomic entities, based on analysis of the pollination biology and the reproductive system of both species. In order to define the pollinators of each species, observations were made in environments of natural occurrence of S. lutea and S. allagophylla, with support of videos and photographic records. In addition, we determined the volume and concentrations of nectar, the latter being an important factor in determining the pollinator. We also analyzed comparatively the morphological characteristics of both species, relating them to the corresponding pollinator. Also, we determine the reproductive system, which indicates the dependence or not of pollinators activity for the reproductive success of the species (self-compatibility). Our results indicate significant differences in morphological characters and nectar concentration between the two species. Sinningia lutea has yellowish-colored flowers and shorter and broader corollas, as well as much more concentrated nectar (bee pollination characteristics), while Sinningia allagophylla has reddish color and longer and narrower corollas, including much more diluted nectar (pollination characteristics by hummingbirds). In addition, our field observations confirmed the distinction of pollinators between species. Sinningia lutea is pollinated by Centris (Heterocentris)analis bees, while Sinningia allagophylla is pollinated by hummingbirds Chlorostilbon lucidus. Both species are self-supporting, but dependent on pollinators. Therefore, Sinningia lutea and Sinningia allagophylla are biologically separated and may be considered independent species. Our results highlight the importance of the study of ecological relations, such as the biology of pollination, associated to the evolutionary history of the plants to establish correct taxonomic relations and to promote appropriate methodologies for the maintenance of the species.
id UPF-1_eeb9ed86136c26d573270bae91923a3a
oai_identifier_str oai:tede.upf.br:tede/1850
network_acronym_str UPF-1
network_name_str Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
repository_id_str
spelling Buzatto, Cristiano Roberto81673612091http://lattes.cnpq.br/945664640864460602684688001http://lattes.cnpq.br/5925681179455072De Bastiani, Aline2019-12-13T17:57:55Z2019-08-02DE BASTIANI, Aline. Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies. 2019. 78 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Ambientais) - Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, 2019.http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1850The native flora preservation of a region is closely linked to the intrinsic knowledge of the organisms which compose it. The correct identification of plant species and the determination of their ecological and reproductive needs are fundamental elements to promote efficient conservation strategies. Studies related to plant taxonomy are often based only on morphological characters, which makes it difficult to accurately interpret the taxonomic position of many species. In this sense, the analysis of the reproductive systems and the biology of the pollination serve as a subsidy to clarify possibly wrong hypotheses. The recent discovery of the plant species Sinningia lutea has caused divergences in the scientific environment, with a tendency to incorporate it to the present Sinningia allagophylla, although they have very different structural characteristics. Thus, the present study aimed to determine if Sinningia lutea and Sinningia allagophylla should, in fact, be considered distinct taxonomic entities, based on analysis of the pollination biology and the reproductive system of both species. In order to define the pollinators of each species, observations were made in environments of natural occurrence of S. lutea and S. allagophylla, with support of videos and photographic records. In addition, we determined the volume and concentrations of nectar, the latter being an important factor in determining the pollinator. We also analyzed comparatively the morphological characteristics of both species, relating them to the corresponding pollinator. Also, we determine the reproductive system, which indicates the dependence or not of pollinators activity for the reproductive success of the species (self-compatibility). Our results indicate significant differences in morphological characters and nectar concentration between the two species. Sinningia lutea has yellowish-colored flowers and shorter and broader corollas, as well as much more concentrated nectar (bee pollination characteristics), while Sinningia allagophylla has reddish color and longer and narrower corollas, including much more diluted nectar (pollination characteristics by hummingbirds). In addition, our field observations confirmed the distinction of pollinators between species. Sinningia lutea is pollinated by Centris (Heterocentris)analis bees, while Sinningia allagophylla is pollinated by hummingbirds Chlorostilbon lucidus. Both species are self-supporting, but dependent on pollinators. Therefore, Sinningia lutea and Sinningia allagophylla are biologically separated and may be considered independent species. Our results highlight the importance of the study of ecological relations, such as the biology of pollination, associated to the evolutionary history of the plants to establish correct taxonomic relations and to promote appropriate methodologies for the maintenance of the species.A preservação da flora nativa de uma região está intimamente relacionada ao conhecimento intrínseco dos organismos que a compõem. A identificação correta de espécies vegetais e a determinação das suas necessidades ecológicas e reprodutivas são elementos fundamentais para promover estratégias de conservação eficientes. Estudos relacionados à taxonomia de plantas são, muitas vezes, baseados apenas em caracteres morfológicos, o que dificulta uma interpretação precisa da posição taxonômica de muitas espécies. Nesse sentido, a análise dos sistemas reprodutivos e a biologia da polinização servem de subsídio para esclarecer hipóteses possivelmente equivocadas. A recente descoberta da espécie vegetal Sinningia lutea tem causado divergências no meio científico, com tendência à incorporação desta à atual Sinningia allagophylla, apesar de apresentarem características estruturais muito diferenciadas. Dessa forma, o presente estudo teve como objetivo determinar se S. lutea e S. allagophylla devem, de fato, ser consideradas entidades taxonômicas distintas, com base em análises da biologia da polinização e do sistema reprodutivo de ambas as espécies. Para definir os polinizadores de cada espécie, foram realizadas observações em ambientes de ocorrência natural de S. lutea e S. allagophylla, com suporte de registros fílmicos e fotográficos. Além disso, determinamos o volume e as concentrações de néctar, sendo este último um importante fator na determinação do polinizador. Também analisamos comparativamente as características morfológicas de ambas as espécies, relacionando-as com o polinizador correspondente. Ainda, determinamos o sistema reprodutivo, que indica a dependência, ou não, da atividade dos polinizadores para o sucesso reprodutivo da espécie (autocompatibilidade). Nossos resultados apontam diferenças significativas em caracteres morfológicos e concentração de néctar entre as duas espécies. S. lutea possui flores com cores amareladas e corolas mais curtas e largas, além de néctar muito mais concentrado (características de polinização por abelhas), enquanto S. allagophylla possui cores avermelhadas e corolas mais longas e estreitas, incluindo néctar muito mais diluído (características de polinização por beija-flores). Além disso, nossas observações a campo confirmaram a distinção de polinizadores entre as espécies. Sinningia lutea é polinizada por abelhas Centris (Heterocentris) analis, enquanto S. allagophylla é polinizada pelo beija-flor Chlorostilbon lucidus. Ambas as espécies são autocompatíveis, mas dependentes de polinizadores. Portanto, S. lutea e S. allagophylla estão biologicamente separadas e podem ser consideradas espécies independentes. Nossos resultados evidenciam a importância do estudo das relações ecológicas, como a biologia da polinização, associadas à história evolutiva das plantas para estabelecer relações taxonômicas corretas e promover metodologias adequadas para a manutenção das espécies.Submitted by Mariana Freitas (marianafreitas@upf.br) on 2019-12-13T17:57:55Z No. of bitstreams: 1 2019AlineDeBastiani.pdf: 3056450 bytes, checksum: d52ff0f7aed0da3069011a6a887026f1 (MD5)Made available in DSpace on 2019-12-13T17:57:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 2019AlineDeBastiani.pdf: 3056450 bytes, checksum: d52ff0f7aed0da3069011a6a887026f1 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2019-08-02application/pdfporUniversidade de Passo FundoPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciências AmbientaisUPFBrasilInstituto de Ciências Biológicas – ICBAbelhaBeija-florBotânicaClassificaçãoPolinização por insetoCIENCIAS BIOLOGICASBiologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espéciesBiology as pollination as a tool for species delimitationinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis-20057336902156154425005006001422615669402569569-3439178843068202161info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)instacron:UPFORIGINAL2019AlineDeBastiani.pdf2019AlineDeBastiani.pdfapplication/pdf3056450http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/tede/1850/2/2019AlineDeBastiani.pdfd52ff0f7aed0da3069011a6a887026f1MD52LICENSElicense.txtlicense.txttext/plain; charset=utf-82165http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/tede/1850/1/license.txtbd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468MD51tede/18502019-12-13 15:57:55.492oai:tede.upf.br: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Biblioteca Digital de Teses e DissertaçõesPUBhttp://tede.upf.br/oai/requestbiblio@upf.br || bio@upf.br || cas@upf.br || car@upf.br || lve@upf.br || sar@upf.br || sol@upf.br || upfmundi@upf.br || jucelei@upf.bropendoar:2019-12-13T17:57:55Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Biology as pollination as a tool for species delimitation
title Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
spellingShingle Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
De Bastiani, Aline
Abelha
Beija-flor
Botânica
Classificação
Polinização por inseto
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS
title_short Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
title_full Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
title_fullStr Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
title_full_unstemmed Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
title_sort Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies
author De Bastiani, Aline
author_facet De Bastiani, Aline
author_role author
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Buzatto, Cristiano Roberto
dc.contributor.advisor1ID.fl_str_mv 81673612091
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/9456646408644606
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 02684688001
dc.contributor.authorLattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5925681179455072
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Bastiani, Aline
contributor_str_mv Buzatto, Cristiano Roberto
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Abelha
Beija-flor
Botânica
Classificação
Polinização por inseto
topic Abelha
Beija-flor
Botânica
Classificação
Polinização por inseto
CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS BIOLOGICAS
description The native flora preservation of a region is closely linked to the intrinsic knowledge of the organisms which compose it. The correct identification of plant species and the determination of their ecological and reproductive needs are fundamental elements to promote efficient conservation strategies. Studies related to plant taxonomy are often based only on morphological characters, which makes it difficult to accurately interpret the taxonomic position of many species. In this sense, the analysis of the reproductive systems and the biology of the pollination serve as a subsidy to clarify possibly wrong hypotheses. The recent discovery of the plant species Sinningia lutea has caused divergences in the scientific environment, with a tendency to incorporate it to the present Sinningia allagophylla, although they have very different structural characteristics. Thus, the present study aimed to determine if Sinningia lutea and Sinningia allagophylla should, in fact, be considered distinct taxonomic entities, based on analysis of the pollination biology and the reproductive system of both species. In order to define the pollinators of each species, observations were made in environments of natural occurrence of S. lutea and S. allagophylla, with support of videos and photographic records. In addition, we determined the volume and concentrations of nectar, the latter being an important factor in determining the pollinator. We also analyzed comparatively the morphological characteristics of both species, relating them to the corresponding pollinator. Also, we determine the reproductive system, which indicates the dependence or not of pollinators activity for the reproductive success of the species (self-compatibility). Our results indicate significant differences in morphological characters and nectar concentration between the two species. Sinningia lutea has yellowish-colored flowers and shorter and broader corollas, as well as much more concentrated nectar (bee pollination characteristics), while Sinningia allagophylla has reddish color and longer and narrower corollas, including much more diluted nectar (pollination characteristics by hummingbirds). In addition, our field observations confirmed the distinction of pollinators between species. Sinningia lutea is pollinated by Centris (Heterocentris)analis bees, while Sinningia allagophylla is pollinated by hummingbirds Chlorostilbon lucidus. Both species are self-supporting, but dependent on pollinators. Therefore, Sinningia lutea and Sinningia allagophylla are biologically separated and may be considered independent species. Our results highlight the importance of the study of ecological relations, such as the biology of pollination, associated to the evolutionary history of the plants to establish correct taxonomic relations and to promote appropriate methodologies for the maintenance of the species.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2019-12-13T17:57:55Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2019-08-02
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv DE BASTIANI, Aline. Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies. 2019. 78 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Ambientais) - Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, 2019.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1850
identifier_str_mv DE BASTIANI, Aline. Biologia como polinização como ferramenta para delimitação de espécies. 2019. 78 f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciências Ambientais) - Universidade de Passo Fundo, Passo Fundo, RS, 2019.
url http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/handle/tede/1850
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.program.fl_str_mv -2005733690215615442
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 500
500
600
dc.relation.department.fl_str_mv 1422615669402569569
dc.relation.cnpq.fl_str_mv -3439178843068202161
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências Ambientais
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UPF
dc.publisher.country.fl_str_mv Brasil
dc.publisher.department.fl_str_mv Instituto de Ciências Biológicas – ICB
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de Passo Fundo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
instname:Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron:UPF
instname_str Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
instacron_str UPF
institution UPF
reponame_str Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
collection Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF)
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/tede/1850/2/2019AlineDeBastiani.pdf
http://tede.upf.br:8080/jspui/bitstream/tede/1850/1/license.txt
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv d52ff0f7aed0da3069011a6a887026f1
bd3efa91386c1718a7f26a329fdcb468
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca de teses e dissertações da Universidade de Passo Fundo (BDTD UPF) - Universidade de Passo Fundo (UPF)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblio@upf.br || bio@upf.br || cas@upf.br || car@upf.br || lve@upf.br || sar@upf.br || sol@upf.br || upfmundi@upf.br || jucelei@upf.br
_version_ 1809092295390134272