Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Riani, Juliana de Lucena Ruas
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Silva, Vania Candida da, Soares, Tufi Machado
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Educação e Pesquisa
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/47898
Resumo: The objective of this work is to evaluate if retaining pupils of the third year of fundamental education in 2009 brought benefits to their learning in comparison to pupils that advanced to the fourth year. We seek thereby to contribute to the debate about the impact of school failure in pupils' learning. In Brazil, due to the absence of longitudinal data that would allow a more accurate comparison between those pupils who failed and those that advanced, considering their performance before and after the school failure, the majority of studies focus primarily on the impact of the policies of cycles on the performance of the pupil. Using data from the Literacy Assessment Program (and external assessment conducted every year in public schools of the State of Minas Gerais), it was possible to set up a longitudinal database to identify pupils that had repeated and those who had not. To try to explain the performance of students who had failed and those who had not, we tried to use as a guiding line the approach based on the Educational Production Function, having as a methodological basis the hierarchical models. The results indicate that both categories of students - those who had failed and those who had not - displayed very important growth in proficiency average rates. However, the hierarchical models constructed demonstrated that, between two pupils with the same proficiency in 2008, one of them having failed and the other not, the pupil that did not fail tended to present the better proficiency level in 2009. Another important finding refers to the fact that the result of the pupil is very much influenced by the general result of the school.
id USP-11_bdc36f33dc863c10233aa82ab5528539
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/47898
network_acronym_str USP-11
network_name_str Educação e Pesquisa
repository_id_str
spelling Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas GeraisRepetir ou progredir?uma análise da repetência nas escolas públicas de Minas GeraisRepetênciaDesempenhoModelos hierárquicosSchool failurePerformanceHierarchical modelsThe objective of this work is to evaluate if retaining pupils of the third year of fundamental education in 2009 brought benefits to their learning in comparison to pupils that advanced to the fourth year. We seek thereby to contribute to the debate about the impact of school failure in pupils' learning. In Brazil, due to the absence of longitudinal data that would allow a more accurate comparison between those pupils who failed and those that advanced, considering their performance before and after the school failure, the majority of studies focus primarily on the impact of the policies of cycles on the performance of the pupil. Using data from the Literacy Assessment Program (and external assessment conducted every year in public schools of the State of Minas Gerais), it was possible to set up a longitudinal database to identify pupils that had repeated and those who had not. To try to explain the performance of students who had failed and those who had not, we tried to use as a guiding line the approach based on the Educational Production Function, having as a methodological basis the hierarchical models. The results indicate that both categories of students - those who had failed and those who had not - displayed very important growth in proficiency average rates. However, the hierarchical models constructed demonstrated that, between two pupils with the same proficiency in 2008, one of them having failed and the other not, the pupil that did not fail tended to present the better proficiency level in 2009. Another important finding refers to the fact that the result of the pupil is very much influenced by the general result of the school.O objetivo deste trabalho é avaliar se a retenção dos alunos do 3º ano do ensino fundamental em 2009 trouxe maiores benefícios no aprendizado de tais alunos em relação àqueles que progrediram para o 4º ano. Procura-se, dessa forma, contribuir para o debate sobre o impacto da repetência no aprendizado do aluno. No Brasil, devido à carência de dados longitudinais que possibilitem uma comparação mais apurada entre os repetentes e os promovidos, considerando seus desempenhos antes e depois do evento da repetência, a maioria dos estudos enfoca principalmente o impacto das políticas de ciclos no desempenho do aluno. Por meio dos dados do Programa de Avaliação da Alfabetização (avaliação externa realizada anualmente nas escolas públicas de Minas Gerais), foi possível constituir uma base de dados longidudinal que identificasse os alunos repetentes e os não repetentes. Para tentar explicar o desempenho dos alunos repetentes e não repetentes, utilizou-se como marco norteador a abordagem da Função de Produção Educacional e como base metodológica, os modelos hierárquicos. Os resultados indicam que tanto os alunos que repetiram quanto os que não repetiram apresentaram crescimentos bastante importantes nas médias de proficiência. No entanto, os modelos hierárquicos construídos demonstram que, dentre dois alunos com mesma proficiência em 2008, tendo um deles repetido e o outro não, aquele que não repetiu tende a apresentar maior nível de proficiência em 2009. Outro achado importante refere-se ao fato de que o resultado do aluno é muito influenciado pelo resultado geral da escola.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação2012-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/4789810.1590/S1517-97022012000300006Educação e Pesquisa; v. 38 n. 3 (2012); 623-636Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2012); 623-636Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 Núm. 3 (2012); 623-6361678-46341517-9702reponame:Educação e Pesquisainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/47898/51633https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/47898/51634Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRiani, Juliana de Lucena RuasSilva, Vania Candida daSoares, Tufi Machado2012-12-13T09:56:28Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/47898Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/indexPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/oai||revedu@usp.br1678-46341517-9702opendoar:2012-12-13T09:56:28Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
Repetir ou progredir?uma análise da repetência nas escolas públicas de Minas Gerais
title Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
spellingShingle Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
Riani, Juliana de Lucena Ruas
Repetência
Desempenho
Modelos hierárquicos
School failure
Performance
Hierarchical models
title_short Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
title_full Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
title_fullStr Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
title_full_unstemmed Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
title_sort Repeating or advancing?an analysis of school failure in public schools of Minas Gerais
author Riani, Juliana de Lucena Ruas
author_facet Riani, Juliana de Lucena Ruas
Silva, Vania Candida da
Soares, Tufi Machado
author_role author
author2 Silva, Vania Candida da
Soares, Tufi Machado
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Riani, Juliana de Lucena Ruas
Silva, Vania Candida da
Soares, Tufi Machado
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Repetência
Desempenho
Modelos hierárquicos
School failure
Performance
Hierarchical models
topic Repetência
Desempenho
Modelos hierárquicos
School failure
Performance
Hierarchical models
description The objective of this work is to evaluate if retaining pupils of the third year of fundamental education in 2009 brought benefits to their learning in comparison to pupils that advanced to the fourth year. We seek thereby to contribute to the debate about the impact of school failure in pupils' learning. In Brazil, due to the absence of longitudinal data that would allow a more accurate comparison between those pupils who failed and those that advanced, considering their performance before and after the school failure, the majority of studies focus primarily on the impact of the policies of cycles on the performance of the pupil. Using data from the Literacy Assessment Program (and external assessment conducted every year in public schools of the State of Minas Gerais), it was possible to set up a longitudinal database to identify pupils that had repeated and those who had not. To try to explain the performance of students who had failed and those who had not, we tried to use as a guiding line the approach based on the Educational Production Function, having as a methodological basis the hierarchical models. The results indicate that both categories of students - those who had failed and those who had not - displayed very important growth in proficiency average rates. However, the hierarchical models constructed demonstrated that, between two pupils with the same proficiency in 2008, one of them having failed and the other not, the pupil that did not fail tended to present the better proficiency level in 2009. Another important finding refers to the fact that the result of the pupil is very much influenced by the general result of the school.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/47898
10.1590/S1517-97022012000300006
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/47898
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1517-97022012000300006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/47898/51633
https://www.revistas.usp.br/ep/article/view/47898/51634
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Educação e Pesquisa
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Educação
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa; v. 38 n. 3 (2012); 623-636
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 No. 3 (2012); 623-636
Educação e Pesquisa; Vol. 38 Núm. 3 (2012); 623-636
1678-4634
1517-9702
reponame:Educação e Pesquisa
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Educação e Pesquisa
collection Educação e Pesquisa
repository.name.fl_str_mv Educação e Pesquisa - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revedu@usp.br
_version_ 1787713809113153536