The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80514 |
Resumo: | OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the application of the modified Ottawa method by establishing the update need of a systematic review with focus on the caries preventive effect of GIC versus resin pit and fissure sealants; to answer the question as to whether the existing conclusions of this systematic review are still current; to establish whether a new update of this systematic review was needed. METHODS: Application of the Modified Ottawa method. Application date: April/May 2012. RESULTS: Four signals aligned with the criteria of the modified Ottawa method were identified. The content of these signals suggest that higher precision of the current systematic review results might be achieved if an update of the current review were conducted at this point in time. However, these signals further indicate that such systematic review update, despite its higher precision, would only confirm the existing review conclusion that no statistically significant difference exists in the caries-preventive effect of GIC and resin-based fissure sealants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrated the modified Ottawa method as an effective tool in establishing the update need of the systematic review. In addition, it was established that the conclusions of the systematic review in relation to the caries preventive effect of GIC versus resin based fissure sealants are still current, and that no update of this systematic review was warranted at date of application. |
id |
USP-17_2127a981b07bf1ef8de07cbe5c01e68b |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistas.usp.br:article/80514 |
network_acronym_str |
USP-17 |
network_name_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the application of the modified Ottawa method by establishing the update need of a systematic review with focus on the caries preventive effect of GIC versus resin pit and fissure sealants; to answer the question as to whether the existing conclusions of this systematic review are still current; to establish whether a new update of this systematic review was needed. METHODS: Application of the Modified Ottawa method. Application date: April/May 2012. RESULTS: Four signals aligned with the criteria of the modified Ottawa method were identified. The content of these signals suggest that higher precision of the current systematic review results might be achieved if an update of the current review were conducted at this point in time. However, these signals further indicate that such systematic review update, despite its higher precision, would only confirm the existing review conclusion that no statistically significant difference exists in the caries-preventive effect of GIC and resin-based fissure sealants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrated the modified Ottawa method as an effective tool in establishing the update need of the systematic review. In addition, it was established that the conclusions of the systematic review in relation to the caries preventive effect of GIC versus resin based fissure sealants are still current, and that no update of this systematic review was warranted at date of application. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/8051410.1590/1679-775720130014Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 No. 5 (2013); 482-489 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 5 (2013); 482-489 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 21 n. 5 (2013); 482-489 1678-77651678-7757reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80514/84177Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Scienceinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMickenautsch, Steffen Yengopal, Veerasamy 2014-05-08T12:51:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/80514Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/jaosPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/oai||jaos@usp.br1678-77651678-7757opendoar:2014-05-08T12:51:48Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention |
title |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention |
spellingShingle |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention Mickenautsch, Steffen |
title_short |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention |
title_full |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention |
title_fullStr |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention |
title_full_unstemmed |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention |
title_sort |
The modified Ottawa method to establish the update need of a systematic review: glass-ionomer versus resin sealants for caries prevention |
author |
Mickenautsch, Steffen |
author_facet |
Mickenautsch, Steffen Yengopal, Veerasamy |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Yengopal, Veerasamy |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mickenautsch, Steffen Yengopal, Veerasamy |
description |
OBJECTIVE: To demonstrate the application of the modified Ottawa method by establishing the update need of a systematic review with focus on the caries preventive effect of GIC versus resin pit and fissure sealants; to answer the question as to whether the existing conclusions of this systematic review are still current; to establish whether a new update of this systematic review was needed. METHODS: Application of the Modified Ottawa method. Application date: April/May 2012. RESULTS: Four signals aligned with the criteria of the modified Ottawa method were identified. The content of these signals suggest that higher precision of the current systematic review results might be achieved if an update of the current review were conducted at this point in time. However, these signals further indicate that such systematic review update, despite its higher precision, would only confirm the existing review conclusion that no statistically significant difference exists in the caries-preventive effect of GIC and resin-based fissure sealants. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this study demonstrated the modified Ottawa method as an effective tool in establishing the update need of the systematic review. In addition, it was established that the conclusions of the systematic review in relation to the caries preventive effect of GIC versus resin based fissure sealants are still current, and that no update of this systematic review was warranted at date of application. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-09-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80514 10.1590/1679-775720130014 |
url |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80514 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/1679-775720130014 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistas.usp.br/jaos/article/view/80514/84177 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Science info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2013 Journal of Applied Oral Science |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 No. 5 (2013); 482-489 Journal of Applied Oral Science; Vol. 21 Núm. 5 (2013); 482-489 Journal of Applied Oral Science; v. 21 n. 5 (2013); 482-489 1678-7765 1678-7757 reponame:Journal of applied oral science (Online) instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
collection |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Journal of applied oral science (Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||jaos@usp.br |
_version_ |
1800221678065680384 |