Fractures of the cervical spine

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Marcon, Raphael Martus
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca, Teixeira, William Jacobsen, Narasaki, Douglas Kenji, Oliveira, Reginaldo Perilo, Barros, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77037
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review the literature on cervical spine fractures. METHODS: The literature on the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of lower and upper cervical fractures and dislocations was reviewed. RESULTS: Fractures of the cervical spine may be present in polytraumatized patients and should be suspected in patients complaining of neck pain. These fractures are more common in men approximately 30 years of age and are most often caused by automobile accidents. The cervical spine is divided into the upper cervical spine (occiput-C2) and the lower cervical spine (C3-C7), according to anatomical differences. Fractures in the upper cervical spine include fractures of the occipital condyle and the atlas, atlanto-axial dislocations, fractures of the odontoid process, and hangman's fractures in the C2 segment. These fractures are characterized based on specific classifications. In the lower cervical spine, fractures follow the same pattern as in other segments of the spine; currently, the most widely used classification is the SLIC (Subaxial Injury Classification), which predicts the prognosis of an injury based on morphology, the integrity of the disc-ligamentous complex, and the patient's neurological status. It is important to correctly classify the fracture to ensure appropriate treatment. Nerve or spinal cord injuries, pseudarthrosis or malunion, and postoperative infection are the main complications of cervical spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the cervical spine are potentially serious and devastating if not properly treated. Achieving the correct diagnosis and classification of a lesion is the first step toward identifying the most appropriate treatment, which can be either surgical or conservative.
id USP-19_240c90d62bedab0377f9adad912a894b
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/77037
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Fractures of the cervical spineOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review the literature on cervical spine fractures. METHODS: The literature on the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of lower and upper cervical fractures and dislocations was reviewed. RESULTS: Fractures of the cervical spine may be present in polytraumatized patients and should be suspected in patients complaining of neck pain. These fractures are more common in men approximately 30 years of age and are most often caused by automobile accidents. The cervical spine is divided into the upper cervical spine (occiput-C2) and the lower cervical spine (C3-C7), according to anatomical differences. Fractures in the upper cervical spine include fractures of the occipital condyle and the atlas, atlanto-axial dislocations, fractures of the odontoid process, and hangman's fractures in the C2 segment. These fractures are characterized based on specific classifications. In the lower cervical spine, fractures follow the same pattern as in other segments of the spine; currently, the most widely used classification is the SLIC (Subaxial Injury Classification), which predicts the prognosis of an injury based on morphology, the integrity of the disc-ligamentous complex, and the patient's neurological status. It is important to correctly classify the fracture to ensure appropriate treatment. Nerve or spinal cord injuries, pseudarthrosis or malunion, and postoperative infection are the main complications of cervical spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the cervical spine are potentially serious and devastating if not properly treated. Achieving the correct diagnosis and classification of a lesion is the first step toward identifying the most appropriate treatment, which can be either surgical or conservative.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2013-11-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/7703710.1590/clin.v68i11.77037Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 11 (2013); 1455-1461Clinics; v. 68 n. 11 (2013); 1455-1461Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 11 (2013); 1455-14611980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77037/80900Marcon, Raphael MartusCristante, Alexandre FogacaTeixeira, William JacobsenNarasaki, Douglas KenjiOliveira, Reginaldo PeriloBarros, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa deinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2014-03-24T12:00:47Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/77037Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2014-03-24T12:00:47Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Fractures of the cervical spine
title Fractures of the cervical spine
spellingShingle Fractures of the cervical spine
Marcon, Raphael Martus
title_short Fractures of the cervical spine
title_full Fractures of the cervical spine
title_fullStr Fractures of the cervical spine
title_full_unstemmed Fractures of the cervical spine
title_sort Fractures of the cervical spine
author Marcon, Raphael Martus
author_facet Marcon, Raphael Martus
Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
Teixeira, William Jacobsen
Narasaki, Douglas Kenji
Oliveira, Reginaldo Perilo
Barros, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de
author_role author
author2 Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
Teixeira, William Jacobsen
Narasaki, Douglas Kenji
Oliveira, Reginaldo Perilo
Barros, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Marcon, Raphael Martus
Cristante, Alexandre Fogaca
Teixeira, William Jacobsen
Narasaki, Douglas Kenji
Oliveira, Reginaldo Perilo
Barros, Tarcisio Eloy Pessoa de
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to review the literature on cervical spine fractures. METHODS: The literature on the diagnosis, classification, and treatment of lower and upper cervical fractures and dislocations was reviewed. RESULTS: Fractures of the cervical spine may be present in polytraumatized patients and should be suspected in patients complaining of neck pain. These fractures are more common in men approximately 30 years of age and are most often caused by automobile accidents. The cervical spine is divided into the upper cervical spine (occiput-C2) and the lower cervical spine (C3-C7), according to anatomical differences. Fractures in the upper cervical spine include fractures of the occipital condyle and the atlas, atlanto-axial dislocations, fractures of the odontoid process, and hangman's fractures in the C2 segment. These fractures are characterized based on specific classifications. In the lower cervical spine, fractures follow the same pattern as in other segments of the spine; currently, the most widely used classification is the SLIC (Subaxial Injury Classification), which predicts the prognosis of an injury based on morphology, the integrity of the disc-ligamentous complex, and the patient's neurological status. It is important to correctly classify the fracture to ensure appropriate treatment. Nerve or spinal cord injuries, pseudarthrosis or malunion, and postoperative infection are the main complications of cervical spine fractures. CONCLUSIONS: Fractures of the cervical spine are potentially serious and devastating if not properly treated. Achieving the correct diagnosis and classification of a lesion is the first step toward identifying the most appropriate treatment, which can be either surgical or conservative.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-11-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77037
10.1590/clin.v68i11.77037
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77037
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/clin.v68i11.77037
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/77037/80900
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 68 No. 11 (2013); 1455-1461
Clinics; v. 68 n. 11 (2013); 1455-1461
Clinics; Vol. 68 Núm. 11 (2013); 1455-1461
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222760791703552