Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Cardoso, Giovana Irikura
Data de Publicação: 2021
Outros Autores: Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque, Hojaij, Flavio, Akamatsu, Flávia Emi, Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926
Resumo: Our systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor ‘‘Corona Mortis’’ in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Sau´ de (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Sau´ de [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espan˜ ol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts’ relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions.
id USP-19_4237405e4c3bbc495915b822251cb0c8
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/191926
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of LiteratureCorona MortisSurgeryAnatomicalVariationVascularizationPelvisOur systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor ‘‘Corona Mortis’’ in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Sau´ de (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Sau´ de [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espan˜ ol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts’ relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions.Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2021-10-23info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/19192610.6061/clinics/2021/e2182Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2182Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2182Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e21821980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926/176901Copyright (c) 2021 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCardoso, Giovana Irikura Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque Hojaij, Flavio Akamatsu, Flávia Emi Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz 2023-07-06T13:04:09Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/191926Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2023-07-06T13:04:09Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
spellingShingle Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
Cardoso, Giovana Irikura
Corona Mortis
Surgery
Anatomical
Variation
Vascularization
Pelvis
title_short Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_full Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_fullStr Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_full_unstemmed Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
title_sort Corona Mortis: A Systematic Review of Literature
author Cardoso, Giovana Irikura
author_facet Cardoso, Giovana Irikura
Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque
Hojaij, Flavio
Akamatsu, Flávia Emi
Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz
author_role author
author2 Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque
Hojaij, Flavio
Akamatsu, Flávia Emi
Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cardoso, Giovana Irikura
Chinelatto, Lucas Albuquerque
Hojaij, Flavio
Akamatsu, Flávia Emi
Jacomo, Alfredo Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Corona Mortis
Surgery
Anatomical
Variation
Vascularization
Pelvis
topic Corona Mortis
Surgery
Anatomical
Variation
Vascularization
Pelvis
description Our systematic review evaluates surgically relevant information about corona mortis (CM), such as anatomical structure, size, laterality, incidence, and anthropometric correlations. This study aimed to provide data about anastomosis in an attempt to avoid iatrogenic damage during surgery. Articles were searched online using the descriptor ‘‘Corona Mortis’’ in PubMed, Biblioteca Virtual em Sau´ de (BVS) (Literatura Latino-Americana e do Caribe em Sau´ de [LILACS], MEDLINE, indice bibliografico espan˜ ol en ciencias de la salud [IBECS]), and SciELO database. The time range was set between 1995 and 2020. The articles were selected according to their titles and later the abstracts’ relation to our research purpose. All the selected articles were read entirely. A manual search based of the references cited in these articles was also conducted to identify other articles or books of interest. Forty references fulfilled the criteria for this review. The mean incidence of CM was 63% (the majority venous) among 3,107 hemipelvises. The incidence of bilateral CM was lower than that of unilateral variations based on the analysis of 831 pelvises. The mean caliber of the anastomosis was 2.8 mm among 1,608 hemipelvises. There is no consensus concerning the anthropometric influences in CM. Finally, we concluded that CM is not an unusual anatomical variation and that we must not underestimate the risk of encountering the anastomosis during surgery. Anatomical knowledge of CM is, therefore, essential in preventing accidents for surgeons who approach the inguinal and retropubic regions.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-23
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926
10.6061/clinics/2021/e2182
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2021/e2182
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/191926/176901
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2021 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2182
Clinics; v. 76 (2021); e2182
Clinics; Vol. 76 (2021); e2182
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222765663387648