A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Horasanli, Eyup
Data de Publicação: 2010
Outros Autores: Gamli, Mehmet, Pala, Yasar, Erol, Mustafa, Sahin, Fazilet, Dikmen, Bayazit
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18419
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of combined lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks was compared to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I-III patients (age range 18 to 65) undergoing knee surgery. The patients were randomly divided into one of two groups. Epidural anesthesia was performed in the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (n=40), and the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerves were blockedin the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks (LPSB) group (n=40). For each patient, onset of sensory and motor block, degree of motor block, sign of sensory block in the contralateral lower limb for the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group, success in providing adequate anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, time of first analgesic request, and patient and surgeon satisfaction with the anesthetic technique were recorded. RESULTS: One patient in the epidural anesthesia group and three patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group required general anesthesia due to failed block. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the success of providing adequate anesthesia. Eight patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group developed contralateral spread. The onset of sensory-motor block and the time of the first analgesic request were significantly later in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. Although there were no significant differences regarding patient satisfaction with the anesthetic technique between the two groups, surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. CONCLUSION: The lumbar plexus -sciatic nerve blocks provide effective unilateral anesthesia and may offer a beneficial alternative to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery.
id USP-19_537be757a9f064b068f7e2349293d333
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/18419
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery Epidural anesthesialumbar plexussciatic nerve blockknee surgery OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of combined lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks was compared to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I-III patients (age range 18 to 65) undergoing knee surgery. The patients were randomly divided into one of two groups. Epidural anesthesia was performed in the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (n=40), and the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerves were blockedin the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks (LPSB) group (n=40). For each patient, onset of sensory and motor block, degree of motor block, sign of sensory block in the contralateral lower limb for the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group, success in providing adequate anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, time of first analgesic request, and patient and surgeon satisfaction with the anesthetic technique were recorded. RESULTS: One patient in the epidural anesthesia group and three patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group required general anesthesia due to failed block. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the success of providing adequate anesthesia. Eight patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group developed contralateral spread. The onset of sensory-motor block and the time of the first analgesic request were significantly later in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. Although there were no significant differences regarding patient satisfaction with the anesthetic technique between the two groups, surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. CONCLUSION: The lumbar plexus -sciatic nerve blocks provide effective unilateral anesthesia and may offer a beneficial alternative to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2010-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/1841910.1590/S1807-59322010000100006Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 1 (2010); 29-34 Clinics; v. 65 n. 1 (2010); 29-34 Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 1 (2010); 29-34 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18419/20482Horasanli, EyupGamli, MehmetPala, YasarErol, MustafaSahin, FaziletDikmen, Bayazitinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2012-05-23T11:21:51Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/18419Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2012-05-23T11:21:51Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
title A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
spellingShingle A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
Horasanli, Eyup
Epidural anesthesia
lumbar plexus
sciatic nerve block
knee surgery
title_short A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
title_full A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
title_fullStr A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
title_sort A comparison of epidural anesthesia and lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks for knee surgery
author Horasanli, Eyup
author_facet Horasanli, Eyup
Gamli, Mehmet
Pala, Yasar
Erol, Mustafa
Sahin, Fazilet
Dikmen, Bayazit
author_role author
author2 Gamli, Mehmet
Pala, Yasar
Erol, Mustafa
Sahin, Fazilet
Dikmen, Bayazit
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Horasanli, Eyup
Gamli, Mehmet
Pala, Yasar
Erol, Mustafa
Sahin, Fazilet
Dikmen, Bayazit
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Epidural anesthesia
lumbar plexus
sciatic nerve block
knee surgery
topic Epidural anesthesia
lumbar plexus
sciatic nerve block
knee surgery
description OBJECTIVES: The efficacy of combined lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks was compared to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 80 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I-III patients (age range 18 to 65) undergoing knee surgery. The patients were randomly divided into one of two groups. Epidural anesthesia was performed in the epidural anesthesia (EA) group (n=40), and the lumbar plexus and sciatic nerves were blockedin the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks (LPSB) group (n=40). For each patient, onset of sensory and motor block, degree of motor block, sign of sensory block in the contralateral lower limb for the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group, success in providing adequate anesthesia, hemodynamic changes, time of first analgesic request, and patient and surgeon satisfaction with the anesthetic technique were recorded. RESULTS: One patient in the epidural anesthesia group and three patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group required general anesthesia due to failed block. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the success of providing adequate anesthesia. Eight patients in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group developed contralateral spread. The onset of sensory-motor block and the time of the first analgesic request were significantly later in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. Although there were no significant differences regarding patient satisfaction with the anesthetic technique between the two groups, surgeon satisfaction was significantly higher in the lumbar plexus-sciatic nerve blocks group than in the epidural anesthesia group. CONCLUSION: The lumbar plexus -sciatic nerve blocks provide effective unilateral anesthesia and may offer a beneficial alternative to epidural anesthesia in patients undergoing total knee surgery.
publishDate 2010
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2010-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18419
10.1590/S1807-59322010000100006
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18419
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S1807-59322010000100006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/18419/20482
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 65 No. 1 (2010); 29-34
Clinics; v. 65 n. 1 (2010); 29-34
Clinics; Vol. 65 Núm. 1 (2010); 29-34
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222755298213888