Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: McKinney, Jennifer R.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Sussman, Marshall S., Moineddin, Rahim, Amirabadi, Afsaneh, Rayner, Tammy, Doria, Andrea S.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Clinics
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/118034
Resumo: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of cartilage tissue-mimicking phantoms and to determine a combination of magnetic resonance imaging parameters to optimize accuracy while minimizing scan time. METHOD: Edge dimensions from 4 rectangular agar phantoms ranging from 10.5 to 14.5 mm in length and 1.25 to 5.5 mm in width were independently measured by two readers using a steel ruler. Coronal T1 spin echo (T1 SE), fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo (FSPGR) and multiplanar gradient-recalled echo (GRE MPGR) sequences were used to obtain phantom images on a 1.5-T scanner. RESULTS: Inter- and intra-reader reliability were high for both direct measurements and for magnetic resonance imaging measurements of phantoms. Statistically significant differences were noted between the mean direct measurements and the mean magnetic resonance imaging measurements for phantom 1 when using a GRE MPGR sequence (512x512 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 5:49 min scan time), while borderline differences were noted for T1 SE sequences with the following parameters: 320x320 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 6:11 min scan time; 320x320 pixels, 4-mm slice thickness, 6:11 min scan time; and 512x512 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 9:48 min scan time. Borderline differences were also noted when using a FSPGR sequence with 512x512 pixels, a 1.5-mm slice thickness and a 3:36 min scan time. CONCLUSIONS: FSPGR sequences, regardless of the magnetic resonance imaging parameter combination used, provided accurate measurements. The GRE MPGR sequence using 512x512 pixels, a 1.5-mm slice thickness and a 5:49 min scan time and, to a lesser degree, all tested T1 SE sequences produced suboptimal accuracy when measuring the widest phantom.
id USP-19_881b06390427a69d4a4562d76203036d
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/118034
network_acronym_str USP-19
network_name_str Clinics
repository_id_str
spelling Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of cartilage tissue-mimicking phantoms and to determine a combination of magnetic resonance imaging parameters to optimize accuracy while minimizing scan time. METHOD: Edge dimensions from 4 rectangular agar phantoms ranging from 10.5 to 14.5 mm in length and 1.25 to 5.5 mm in width were independently measured by two readers using a steel ruler. Coronal T1 spin echo (T1 SE), fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo (FSPGR) and multiplanar gradient-recalled echo (GRE MPGR) sequences were used to obtain phantom images on a 1.5-T scanner. RESULTS: Inter- and intra-reader reliability were high for both direct measurements and for magnetic resonance imaging measurements of phantoms. Statistically significant differences were noted between the mean direct measurements and the mean magnetic resonance imaging measurements for phantom 1 when using a GRE MPGR sequence (512x512 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 5:49 min scan time), while borderline differences were noted for T1 SE sequences with the following parameters: 320x320 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 6:11 min scan time; 320x320 pixels, 4-mm slice thickness, 6:11 min scan time; and 512x512 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 9:48 min scan time. Borderline differences were also noted when using a FSPGR sequence with 512x512 pixels, a 1.5-mm slice thickness and a 3:36 min scan time. CONCLUSIONS: FSPGR sequences, regardless of the magnetic resonance imaging parameter combination used, provided accurate measurements. The GRE MPGR sequence using 512x512 pixels, a 1.5-mm slice thickness and a 5:49 min scan time and, to a lesser degree, all tested T1 SE sequences produced suboptimal accuracy when measuring the widest phantom. Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/11803410.6061/clinics/2016(07)09Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 7 (2016); 404-411 Clinics; v. 71 n. 7 (2016); 404-411 Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 7 (2016); 404-411 1980-53221807-5932reponame:Clinicsinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/118034/115658Copyright (c) 2016 Clinicsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMcKinney, Jennifer R.Sussman, Marshall S.Moineddin, RahimAmirabadi, AfsanehRayner, TammyDoria, Andrea S.2016-07-21T17:00:41Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/118034Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinicsPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/oai||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br1980-53221807-5932opendoar:2016-07-21T17:00:41Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
title Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
spellingShingle Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
McKinney, Jennifer R.
title_short Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
title_full Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
title_fullStr Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
title_full_unstemmed Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
title_sort Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for measuring maturing cartilage: A phantom study
author McKinney, Jennifer R.
author_facet McKinney, Jennifer R.
Sussman, Marshall S.
Moineddin, Rahim
Amirabadi, Afsaneh
Rayner, Tammy
Doria, Andrea S.
author_role author
author2 Sussman, Marshall S.
Moineddin, Rahim
Amirabadi, Afsaneh
Rayner, Tammy
Doria, Andrea S.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv McKinney, Jennifer R.
Sussman, Marshall S.
Moineddin, Rahim
Amirabadi, Afsaneh
Rayner, Tammy
Doria, Andrea S.
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging measurements of cartilage tissue-mimicking phantoms and to determine a combination of magnetic resonance imaging parameters to optimize accuracy while minimizing scan time. METHOD: Edge dimensions from 4 rectangular agar phantoms ranging from 10.5 to 14.5 mm in length and 1.25 to 5.5 mm in width were independently measured by two readers using a steel ruler. Coronal T1 spin echo (T1 SE), fast spoiled gradient-recalled echo (FSPGR) and multiplanar gradient-recalled echo (GRE MPGR) sequences were used to obtain phantom images on a 1.5-T scanner. RESULTS: Inter- and intra-reader reliability were high for both direct measurements and for magnetic resonance imaging measurements of phantoms. Statistically significant differences were noted between the mean direct measurements and the mean magnetic resonance imaging measurements for phantom 1 when using a GRE MPGR sequence (512x512 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 5:49 min scan time), while borderline differences were noted for T1 SE sequences with the following parameters: 320x320 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 6:11 min scan time; 320x320 pixels, 4-mm slice thickness, 6:11 min scan time; and 512x512 pixels, 1.5-mm slice thickness, 9:48 min scan time. Borderline differences were also noted when using a FSPGR sequence with 512x512 pixels, a 1.5-mm slice thickness and a 3:36 min scan time. CONCLUSIONS: FSPGR sequences, regardless of the magnetic resonance imaging parameter combination used, provided accurate measurements. The GRE MPGR sequence using 512x512 pixels, a 1.5-mm slice thickness and a 5:49 min scan time and, to a lesser degree, all tested T1 SE sequences produced suboptimal accuracy when measuring the widest phantom.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-07-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/118034
10.6061/clinics/2016(07)09
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/118034
identifier_str_mv 10.6061/clinics/2016(07)09
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/clinics/article/view/118034/115658
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2016 Clinics
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Clinics; Vol. 71 No. 7 (2016); 404-411
Clinics; v. 71 n. 7 (2016); 404-411
Clinics; Vol. 71 Núm. 7 (2016); 404-411
1980-5322
1807-5932
reponame:Clinics
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Clinics
collection Clinics
repository.name.fl_str_mv Clinics - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||clinics@hc.fm.usp.br
_version_ 1800222762652925952