Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: DaSilveira, Amanda da Costa
Data de Publicação: 2012
Outros Autores: Gomes, William Barbosa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
eng
Título da fonte: Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/46688
Resumo: This study presents a phenomenological analysis of inner speech under two conditions: (a) the performance of a thinking-aloud task, contextualized by psychometric parameters, and (b) conscious experience of daily life. A total of 23 undergraduate students, aged between 18 and 28 years old, participated in the study. Three instruments were used: Raven Progressive Matrices, Rumination and Reflection Questionnaire, and a phenomenological interview. The following stood out: the structural triad of a voice (the Self) that talks to a third party (You) about an object (Me), according to the Peirce-Mead model of Norbert Wiley, the bi-dimensional intentionality that exists between the task and the self, and rumination disruptions during the performance of the Raven test. The phenomenological interviews revealed when, why and how inner dialogue occurs, as well as when it is inappropriate (circular thinking) or appropriate (productive and strategic thinking). This study also differentiated first and third person data in a cognitive phenomenon that was observed.
id USP-22_86b38eb27d798a59848688e4597d9292
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/46688
network_acronym_str USP-22
network_name_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving contextPerspectiva experiencial de conversación interna en un contexto de solución de problemasPerspectiva experiencial da conversa interna no contexto de resolução de problemasProcessos CognitivosLinguagemPensamentoFenomenologiaConsciênciaProcesos CognitivosLenguajePensamientoFenomenologíaConcienciaCognitive ProcessesLanguageThinkingPhenomenologyConscienceThis study presents a phenomenological analysis of inner speech under two conditions: (a) the performance of a thinking-aloud task, contextualized by psychometric parameters, and (b) conscious experience of daily life. A total of 23 undergraduate students, aged between 18 and 28 years old, participated in the study. Three instruments were used: Raven Progressive Matrices, Rumination and Reflection Questionnaire, and a phenomenological interview. The following stood out: the structural triad of a voice (the Self) that talks to a third party (You) about an object (Me), according to the Peirce-Mead model of Norbert Wiley, the bi-dimensional intentionality that exists between the task and the self, and rumination disruptions during the performance of the Raven test. The phenomenological interviews revealed when, why and how inner dialogue occurs, as well as when it is inappropriate (circular thinking) or appropriate (productive and strategic thinking). This study also differentiated first and third person data in a cognitive phenomenon that was observed.Se trata de un análisis fenomenológico de la conversación interna en dos condiciones: (a) el desempeño de tareas en voz alta contextualizada por parámetros psicométricos, y (b) la experiencia consciente de la vida cotidiana. Los sujetos fueron 23 estudiantes universitarios, con edades comprendidas entre 18 y 28 años. Se utilizaron tres instrumentos: Test de Matrices Progresivas de Raven; Cuestionario de Rumia y Reflexión; y entrevista fenomenológica. El análisis mostró que: la tríada estructural de una voz (Yo) habla con una tercera parte (Usted) acerca de un objeto (Me), según el modelo de Norbert Wiley, la intencionalidad de dos dimensiones existentes entre la tarea y el self, la interferencia de la rumia durante la ejecución del Raven. Las entrevistas fenomenológicas describieron cuando, por que y como ocurre la conversación interna, y cuando es inadecuada (pensamiento repetitivo) u oportuna (pensamiento productivo, estratégico). El estudio también diferenció la función de datos de la tercera y primera persona en la elucidación de un fenómeno cognitivo.Trata-se de uma análise fenomenológica da conversa interna em duas condições: (a) desempenho de tarefa em voz alta contextualizada por parâmetros psicométricos, (b) experiência consciente da vida cotidiana. Participaram do estudo 23 estudantes universitários, com idade variando entre 17 e 28 anos. Três instrumentos foram utilizados: Teste Matrizes Progressivas de Raven, Questionário de Ruminação e Reflexividade, Entrevista Fenomenológica. Na análise destacou-se: a tríade estrutural de uma voz (eu) que fala a uma terceira parte (você) sobre um objeto (mim) conforme o modelo Peirce-Mead de Nobert Wiley, a intencionalidade bidimensional entre a tarefa e o self, as interferências da ruminação no desempenho do teste de Raven. As entrevistas fenomenológicas descreveram quando, para que, e como ocorre a conversa interna, e quando é inoportuna (pensamento circular) e oportuna (pensamento produtivo). A análise diferenciou a função de dados de terceira e de primeira pessoa na elucidação de um fenômeno cognitivo.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto2012-04-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/4668810.1590/S0103-863X2012000100006Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 22 n. 51 (2012); 43-52Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 22 No. 51 (2012); 43-52Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 22 Núm. 51 (2012); 43-521982-43270103-863Xreponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPporenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/46688/50447https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/46688/50448Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessDaSilveira, Amanda da CostaGomes, William Barbosa2012-10-30T18:43:48Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/46688Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideiaPUBhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/oai||paideia@usp.br1982-43270103-863Xopendoar:2012-10-30T18:43:48Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
Perspectiva experiencial de conversación interna en un contexto de solución de problemas
Perspectiva experiencial da conversa interna no contexto de resolução de problemas
title Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
spellingShingle Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
DaSilveira, Amanda da Costa
Processos Cognitivos
Linguagem
Pensamento
Fenomenologia
Consciência
Procesos Cognitivos
Lenguaje
Pensamiento
Fenomenología
Conciencia
Cognitive Processes
Language
Thinking
Phenomenology
Conscience
title_short Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
title_full Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
title_fullStr Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
title_full_unstemmed Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
title_sort Experiential perspective of inner speech in a problem-solving context
author DaSilveira, Amanda da Costa
author_facet DaSilveira, Amanda da Costa
Gomes, William Barbosa
author_role author
author2 Gomes, William Barbosa
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv DaSilveira, Amanda da Costa
Gomes, William Barbosa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Processos Cognitivos
Linguagem
Pensamento
Fenomenologia
Consciência
Procesos Cognitivos
Lenguaje
Pensamiento
Fenomenología
Conciencia
Cognitive Processes
Language
Thinking
Phenomenology
Conscience
topic Processos Cognitivos
Linguagem
Pensamento
Fenomenologia
Consciência
Procesos Cognitivos
Lenguaje
Pensamiento
Fenomenología
Conciencia
Cognitive Processes
Language
Thinking
Phenomenology
Conscience
description This study presents a phenomenological analysis of inner speech under two conditions: (a) the performance of a thinking-aloud task, contextualized by psychometric parameters, and (b) conscious experience of daily life. A total of 23 undergraduate students, aged between 18 and 28 years old, participated in the study. Three instruments were used: Raven Progressive Matrices, Rumination and Reflection Questionnaire, and a phenomenological interview. The following stood out: the structural triad of a voice (the Self) that talks to a third party (You) about an object (Me), according to the Peirce-Mead model of Norbert Wiley, the bi-dimensional intentionality that exists between the task and the self, and rumination disruptions during the performance of the Raven test. The phenomenological interviews revealed when, why and how inner dialogue occurs, as well as when it is inappropriate (circular thinking) or appropriate (productive and strategic thinking). This study also differentiated first and third person data in a cognitive phenomenon that was observed.
publishDate 2012
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2012-04-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/46688
10.1590/S0103-863X2012000100006
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/46688
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0103-863X2012000100006
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
eng
language por
eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/46688/50447
https://www.revistas.usp.br/paideia/article/view/46688/50448
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto)
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Filosofia, Ciências e Letras de Ribeirão Preto
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); v. 22 n. 51 (2012); 43-52
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 22 No. 51 (2012); 43-52
Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto); Vol. 22 Núm. 51 (2012); 43-52
1982-4327
0103-863X
reponame:Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
collection Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Paidéia (Ribeirão Preto. Online) - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||paideia@usp.br
_version_ 1800221833687990272