Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Silva, Shana Ginar da
Data de Publicação: 2019
Outros Autores: Bertoldi, Andréa Dâmaso, Silveira, Mariângela Freitas da, Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues, Evenson, Kelly R, Santos, Iná Silva dos
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097
Resumo: OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries.
id USP-23_0b840fcfa7ee25b5a58af29ba5953fc1
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/154097
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern BrazilReproductive Techniques, AssistedFertilization in VitroEmbryo TransferInsemination, ArtificialRisk FactorsSocioeconomic FactorsLow-Middle Income CountriesOBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries.Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2019-01-30info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/xmlhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/15409710.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 53 (2019); 131518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150346https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150347Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Shana Ginar daBertoldi, Andréa DâmasoSilveira, Mariângela Freitas daDomingues, Marlos RodriguesEvenson, Kelly RSantos, Iná Silva dos2019-03-29T14:01:52Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/154097Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2019-03-29T14:01:52Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
title Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
spellingShingle Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
Silva, Shana Ginar da
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Fertilization in Vitro
Embryo Transfer
Insemination, Artificial
Risk Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Low-Middle Income Countries
title_short Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
title_full Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
title_fullStr Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
title_sort Assisted reproductive technology: prevalence and associated factors in Southern Brazil
author Silva, Shana Ginar da
author_facet Silva, Shana Ginar da
Bertoldi, Andréa Dâmaso
Silveira, Mariângela Freitas da
Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues
Evenson, Kelly R
Santos, Iná Silva dos
author_role author
author2 Bertoldi, Andréa Dâmaso
Silveira, Mariângela Freitas da
Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues
Evenson, Kelly R
Santos, Iná Silva dos
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Silva, Shana Ginar da
Bertoldi, Andréa Dâmaso
Silveira, Mariângela Freitas da
Domingues, Marlos Rodrigues
Evenson, Kelly R
Santos, Iná Silva dos
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Fertilization in Vitro
Embryo Transfer
Insemination, Artificial
Risk Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Low-Middle Income Countries
topic Reproductive Techniques, Assisted
Fertilization in Vitro
Embryo Transfer
Insemination, Artificial
Risk Factors
Socioeconomic Factors
Low-Middle Income Countries
description OBJECTIVE: To assess the prevalence of successful assisted reproductive technology and to identify the associated factors. METHODS: This population-based birth cohort study was carried out with 4,333 pregnant women expected to deliver in 2015 in the urban area of Pelotas, Southern Brazil. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure, type of assisted reproductive technology [in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection or artificial insemination], number of embryos transferred, success of embryo transfer, number of attempts, and reported reasons for seeking assisted reproductive technology were the main outcomes measured. Use of an assisted reproductive technology procedure was analyzed according to sociodemographic, nutritional, reproductive history, and behavioral characteristics. Unadjusted and adjusted analyses were performed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Among the 4,275 newborns enrolled in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study, 18 births (0.4%) were conceived by assisted reproductive technology. Most cases of assisted reproductive technology were by in vitro fertilization (70.6%). All cycles were performed in private clinics under direct out-of-pocket payment. Even after controlling for confounders, maternal age > 35 years, nulliparity and high family monthly income were strongly associated with assisted reproductive technology. CONCLUSIONS: The use of assisted reproductive technology services was reported by only a few women in the Pelotas 2015 Birth Cohort Study. Our study highlights sociodemographic factors associated to assisted reproductive technology procedures. To better understand the patterns and barriers in overall use of assisted reproductive technology services over time, national-level trend studies in assisted reproductive technology treatments and outcomes, as well as studies exploring the characteristics of women who have sought this kind of treatment are needed in low-middle income countries.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-30
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097
10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097
identifier_str_mv 10.11606/S1518-8787.2019053000737
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150346
https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/154097/150347
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2019 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/xml
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 53 (2019); 13
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 53 (2019); 13
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221800018214912