Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Malta, Deborah Carvalho, Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira, Bracco, Mário M, Florindo, Alex Antonio, Mielke, Gregore Iven, Parra, Diana C, Lobelo, Felipe, Simoes, Eduardo J, Hallal, Pedro Curi
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista de Saúde Pública
Texto Completo: https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/86925
Resumo: OBJECTIVE Assessment of prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units within Brazil’s health system. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study based on telephone interviews with managers of primary care units. Of a total 42,486 primary health care units listed in the Brazilian Unified Health System directory, 1,600 were randomly selected. Care units from all five Brazilian macroregions were selected proportionally to the number of units in each region. We examined whether any of the following five different types of health promotion programs was available: physical activity; smoking cessation; cessation of alcohol and illicit drug use; healthy eating; and healthy environment. Information was collected on the kinds of activities offered and the status of implementation of the Family Health Strategy at the units. RESULTS Most units (62.0%) reported having in place three health promotion programs or more and only 3.0% reported having none. Healthy environment (77.0%) and healthy eating (72.0%) programs were the most widely available; smoking and alcohol use cessation were reported in 54.0% and 42.0% of the units. Physical activity programs were offered in less than 40.0% of the units and their availability varied greatly nationwide, from 51.0% in the Southeast to as low as 21.0% in the North. The Family Health Strategy was implemented in most units (61.0%); however, they did not offer more health promotion programs than others did. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that most primary care units have in place health promotion programs. Public policies are needed to strengthen primary care services and improve training of health providers to meet the goals of the agenda for health promotion in Brazil.
id USP-23_7884d4761e9646d77a191b00a2f21a87
oai_identifier_str oai:revistas.usp.br:article/86925
network_acronym_str USP-23
network_name_str Revista de Saúde Pública
repository_id_str
spelling Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil Prevalência de programas de promoção da saúde em unidades básicas de saúde no Brasil OBJECTIVE Assessment of prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units within Brazil’s health system. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study based on telephone interviews with managers of primary care units. Of a total 42,486 primary health care units listed in the Brazilian Unified Health System directory, 1,600 were randomly selected. Care units from all five Brazilian macroregions were selected proportionally to the number of units in each region. We examined whether any of the following five different types of health promotion programs was available: physical activity; smoking cessation; cessation of alcohol and illicit drug use; healthy eating; and healthy environment. Information was collected on the kinds of activities offered and the status of implementation of the Family Health Strategy at the units. RESULTS Most units (62.0%) reported having in place three health promotion programs or more and only 3.0% reported having none. Healthy environment (77.0%) and healthy eating (72.0%) programs were the most widely available; smoking and alcohol use cessation were reported in 54.0% and 42.0% of the units. Physical activity programs were offered in less than 40.0% of the units and their availability varied greatly nationwide, from 51.0% in the Southeast to as low as 21.0% in the North. The Family Health Strategy was implemented in most units (61.0%); however, they did not offer more health promotion programs than others did. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that most primary care units have in place health promotion programs. Public policies are needed to strengthen primary care services and improve training of health providers to meet the goals of the agenda for health promotion in Brazil. OBJETIVO Estimar a prevalência de programas de promoção da saúde nas unidades básicas de saúde no Brasil. MÉTODOS Estudo transversal descritivo realizado por meio de entrevistas telefônicas com coordenadores de unidades básicas de saúde. Do total de 42.486 unidades básicas de saúde cadastradas pelo Ministério da Saúde, 1.600 foram aleatoriamente selecionadas. As unidades foram amostradas nas cinco regiões do País de acordo com a proporção de unidades em cada região. Foi analisada a presença ou não de cinco programas de promoção da saúde: promoção de atividade física, cessação de tabagismo, cessação de uso de álcool e drogas ilícitas, alimentação saudável e ambiente saudável. Foram coletados dados sobre o tipo de ações desenvolvidas nos programas e a presença ou não da Estratégia de Saúde da Família na unidade. RESULTADOS A maioria das unidades básicas de saúde (62,0%) referiu ter pelo menos três programas de promoção da saúde e apenas 3,0% não tinha nenhum. A promoção do ambiente saudável e da alimentação saudável foram os programas mais prevalentes (77,0% e 72,0%, respectivamente), enquanto o controle do tabaco e do álcool foram referidos em 54,0% e 42,0% das unidades de saúde, respectivamente. A promoção de atividade física foi referida em menos de 40,0% das unidades e teve grande variação regional, com prevalência de 51,0% nas unidades do Sudeste e apenas 21,0% nas do Norte. A maioria das unidades de saúde (61,0%) oferecia Estratégia de Saúde da Família, porém não foi verificada maior prevalência de programas de promoção da saúde nessas unidades em relação às outras. CONCLUSÕES Este estudo mostrou que programas de promoção da saúde estão presentes na maioria das unidades básicas de saúde. Políticas públicas devem fortalecer a infraestrutura das unidades básicas de saúde e melhorar a capacitação dos trabalhadores de saúde para executar adequadamente a agenda de promoção de saúde do governo brasileiro. Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/8692510.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 5 (2014); 837-844Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 5 (2014); 837-844Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 5 (2014); 837-8441518-87870034-8910reponame:Revista de Saúde Públicainstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPenghttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/86925/89897Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Públicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessRamos, Luiz Roberto Malta, Deborah Carvalho Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira Bracco, Mário M Florindo, Alex Antonio Mielke, Gregore Iven Parra, Diana C Lobelo, Felipe Simoes, Eduardo J Hallal, Pedro Curi 2014-11-04T11:58:11Zoai:revistas.usp.br:article/86925Revistahttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/indexONGhttps://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/oairevsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br1518-87870034-8910opendoar:2014-11-04T11:58:11Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
Prevalência de programas de promoção da saúde em unidades básicas de saúde no Brasil
title Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
spellingShingle Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
Ramos, Luiz Roberto
title_short Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_full Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_fullStr Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
title_sort Prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units in Brazil
author Ramos, Luiz Roberto
author_facet Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Malta, Deborah Carvalho
Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira
Bracco, Mário M
Florindo, Alex Antonio
Mielke, Gregore Iven
Parra, Diana C
Lobelo, Felipe
Simoes, Eduardo J
Hallal, Pedro Curi
author_role author
author2 Malta, Deborah Carvalho
Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira
Bracco, Mário M
Florindo, Alex Antonio
Mielke, Gregore Iven
Parra, Diana C
Lobelo, Felipe
Simoes, Eduardo J
Hallal, Pedro Curi
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ramos, Luiz Roberto
Malta, Deborah Carvalho
Gomes, Grace Angélica de Oliveira
Bracco, Mário M
Florindo, Alex Antonio
Mielke, Gregore Iven
Parra, Diana C
Lobelo, Felipe
Simoes, Eduardo J
Hallal, Pedro Curi
description OBJECTIVE Assessment of prevalence of health promotion programs in primary health care units within Brazil’s health system. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study based on telephone interviews with managers of primary care units. Of a total 42,486 primary health care units listed in the Brazilian Unified Health System directory, 1,600 were randomly selected. Care units from all five Brazilian macroregions were selected proportionally to the number of units in each region. We examined whether any of the following five different types of health promotion programs was available: physical activity; smoking cessation; cessation of alcohol and illicit drug use; healthy eating; and healthy environment. Information was collected on the kinds of activities offered and the status of implementation of the Family Health Strategy at the units. RESULTS Most units (62.0%) reported having in place three health promotion programs or more and only 3.0% reported having none. Healthy environment (77.0%) and healthy eating (72.0%) programs were the most widely available; smoking and alcohol use cessation were reported in 54.0% and 42.0% of the units. Physical activity programs were offered in less than 40.0% of the units and their availability varied greatly nationwide, from 51.0% in the Southeast to as low as 21.0% in the North. The Family Health Strategy was implemented in most units (61.0%); however, they did not offer more health promotion programs than others did. CONCLUSIONS Our study showed that most primary care units have in place health promotion programs. Public policies are needed to strengthen primary care services and improve training of health providers to meet the goals of the agenda for health promotion in Brazil.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/86925
10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249
url https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/86925
identifier_str_mv 10.1590/S0034-8910.2014048005249
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistas.usp.br/rsp/article/view/86925/89897
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2017 Revista de Saúde Pública
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade de São Paulo. Faculdade de Saúde Pública
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 No. 5 (2014); 837-844
Revista de Saúde Pública; Vol. 48 Núm. 5 (2014); 837-844
Revista de Saúde Pública; v. 48 n. 5 (2014); 837-844
1518-8787
0034-8910
reponame:Revista de Saúde Pública
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Revista de Saúde Pública
collection Revista de Saúde Pública
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Saúde Pública - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revsp@org.usp.br||revsp1@usp.br
_version_ 1800221795934011392