A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
Texto Completo: https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/
Resumo: Loss of Control in Flight (LOC-I) is the most lethal type of air accidents in recent aviation history; however, its characteristics are still not well understood, especially from the perspective of the human pilot. This research analysed whether (and to which extent) a quantitative LOC-I detection criterion correlates with subjective pilots\' opinions on the controllability of an aircraft. Six flight test pilots flew a Boeing 777 in four scenarios (different combinations of typical LOC-I precursors) in a flight simulator, and performed 13 manoeuvres specifically designed to assess different aspects of controllability. The aircraft controllability category was determined from the pilots\' qualitative opinions for each manoeuvre, via the so-called Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHR), and from recorded flight data, according to the Quantitative Loss of Control Criteria (QLC). Statistical correlation tests determined the degree of correlation between the approaches. A positive weak statistically significant correlation was found between the controllability categories resulting from both CHRs and QLC, thus revealing a lack of clear connection between the understandings of a LOC-I by human pilots and quantitative engineering metrics. The outcomes suggest LOC-I detection criteria should be revised towards including qualitative pilots\' opinion, i.e., human-related factors must be given proper attention prior to the introduction and spread of potential \"LOC-I solutions\" solely based on quantitative metrics.
id USP_3c6c1fc30da0b617949fc60e246efbc7
oai_identifier_str oai:teses.usp.br:tde-08022022-160017
network_acronym_str USP
network_name_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository_id_str 2721
spelling A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditionsUm comparativo entre percepção de pilotos humanos e parâmetros de voo em potenciais condições de perda de controle em vooAircraft dynamicsControlabilidadeControllabilityCooper-Harper scaleDinâmica da aeronaveEnsaio em vooEscala Cooper-HarperFlight safetyFlight simulatorFlight testHuman-machine interactionInteração humano-máquinaLoss of control in flightPerda de controle em vooQLCQLCSegurança de vooSimulador de vooLoss of Control in Flight (LOC-I) is the most lethal type of air accidents in recent aviation history; however, its characteristics are still not well understood, especially from the perspective of the human pilot. This research analysed whether (and to which extent) a quantitative LOC-I detection criterion correlates with subjective pilots\' opinions on the controllability of an aircraft. Six flight test pilots flew a Boeing 777 in four scenarios (different combinations of typical LOC-I precursors) in a flight simulator, and performed 13 manoeuvres specifically designed to assess different aspects of controllability. The aircraft controllability category was determined from the pilots\' qualitative opinions for each manoeuvre, via the so-called Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHR), and from recorded flight data, according to the Quantitative Loss of Control Criteria (QLC). Statistical correlation tests determined the degree of correlation between the approaches. A positive weak statistically significant correlation was found between the controllability categories resulting from both CHRs and QLC, thus revealing a lack of clear connection between the understandings of a LOC-I by human pilots and quantitative engineering metrics. The outcomes suggest LOC-I detection criteria should be revised towards including qualitative pilots\' opinion, i.e., human-related factors must be given proper attention prior to the introduction and spread of potential \"LOC-I solutions\" solely based on quantitative metrics.A Perda de Controle em Voo (LOC-I) é o tipo de acidente aéreo mais letal na história recente da aviação, mas suas características ainda não são bem compreendidas, especialmente sob a perspectiva do piloto humano. Esta pesquisa analisou se (e em que medida) um critério quantitativo de detecção de LOC-I correlaciona-se com a percepção subjetiva de pilotos humanos acerca da controlabilidade de uma aeronave. Em um simulador de voo, seis pilotos voaram um Boeing 777 em quatro cenários LOC-I (diferentes combinações de precursores típicos) e realizaram um conjunto de 13 manobras projetadas especificamente para avaliar diferentes aspectos de controlabilidade. Para cada manobra, a categoria de controlabilidade da aeronave foi determinada a partir da opinião qualitativa do piloto, por meio da chamada Escala de Classificação Cooper- Harper (CHR), e dos dados de voo, por meio do Critério de Perda Quantitativa de Controle (QLC). Testes de correlação estatística foram executados para determinar o grau de correlação entre as abordagens. Encontrou-se correlação positiva fraca estatisticamente significativa entre as categorias de controlabilidade decorrentes do CHRs e do QLC. Dada a fraca correlação, conclui-se que não há clara conexão entre o que os pilotos humanos entendem como LOC-I e o que as métricas de engenharia quantitativas sinalizam ser. Os resultados sugerem que os critérios de detecção de LOC-I devem ser revisados para incluir a opinião qualitativa de pilotos, ou seja, antes de introduzir e difundir potenciais \"soluções LOC-I\" unicamente baseadas em métricas quantitativas, fatores humanos devem ser considerados em sua devida atenção.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPBidinotto, Jorge HenriqueMacedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de2021-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2022-02-10T18:22:05Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-08022022-160017Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212022-02-10T18:22:05Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
Um comparativo entre percepção de pilotos humanos e parâmetros de voo em potenciais condições de perda de controle em voo
title A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
spellingShingle A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de
Aircraft dynamics
Controlabilidade
Controllability
Cooper-Harper scale
Dinâmica da aeronave
Ensaio em voo
Escala Cooper-Harper
Flight safety
Flight simulator
Flight test
Human-machine interaction
Interação humano-máquina
Loss of control in flight
Perda de controle em voo
QLC
QLC
Segurança de voo
Simulador de voo
title_short A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
title_full A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
title_fullStr A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
title_sort A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
author Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de
author_facet Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Bidinotto, Jorge Henrique
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Aircraft dynamics
Controlabilidade
Controllability
Cooper-Harper scale
Dinâmica da aeronave
Ensaio em voo
Escala Cooper-Harper
Flight safety
Flight simulator
Flight test
Human-machine interaction
Interação humano-máquina
Loss of control in flight
Perda de controle em voo
QLC
QLC
Segurança de voo
Simulador de voo
topic Aircraft dynamics
Controlabilidade
Controllability
Cooper-Harper scale
Dinâmica da aeronave
Ensaio em voo
Escala Cooper-Harper
Flight safety
Flight simulator
Flight test
Human-machine interaction
Interação humano-máquina
Loss of control in flight
Perda de controle em voo
QLC
QLC
Segurança de voo
Simulador de voo
description Loss of Control in Flight (LOC-I) is the most lethal type of air accidents in recent aviation history; however, its characteristics are still not well understood, especially from the perspective of the human pilot. This research analysed whether (and to which extent) a quantitative LOC-I detection criterion correlates with subjective pilots\' opinions on the controllability of an aircraft. Six flight test pilots flew a Boeing 777 in four scenarios (different combinations of typical LOC-I precursors) in a flight simulator, and performed 13 manoeuvres specifically designed to assess different aspects of controllability. The aircraft controllability category was determined from the pilots\' qualitative opinions for each manoeuvre, via the so-called Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHR), and from recorded flight data, according to the Quantitative Loss of Control Criteria (QLC). Statistical correlation tests determined the degree of correlation between the approaches. A positive weak statistically significant correlation was found between the controllability categories resulting from both CHRs and QLC, thus revealing a lack of clear connection between the understandings of a LOC-I by human pilots and quantitative engineering metrics. The outcomes suggest LOC-I detection criteria should be revised towards including qualitative pilots\' opinion, i.e., human-related factors must be given proper attention prior to the introduction and spread of potential \"LOC-I solutions\" solely based on quantitative metrics.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-12-14
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/
url https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público.
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron:USP
instname_str Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
instacron_str USP
institution USP
reponame_str Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
collection Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br
_version_ 1815256793099534336