A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2021 |
Tipo de documento: | Dissertação |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
Texto Completo: | https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/ |
Resumo: | Loss of Control in Flight (LOC-I) is the most lethal type of air accidents in recent aviation history; however, its characteristics are still not well understood, especially from the perspective of the human pilot. This research analysed whether (and to which extent) a quantitative LOC-I detection criterion correlates with subjective pilots\' opinions on the controllability of an aircraft. Six flight test pilots flew a Boeing 777 in four scenarios (different combinations of typical LOC-I precursors) in a flight simulator, and performed 13 manoeuvres specifically designed to assess different aspects of controllability. The aircraft controllability category was determined from the pilots\' qualitative opinions for each manoeuvre, via the so-called Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHR), and from recorded flight data, according to the Quantitative Loss of Control Criteria (QLC). Statistical correlation tests determined the degree of correlation between the approaches. A positive weak statistically significant correlation was found between the controllability categories resulting from both CHRs and QLC, thus revealing a lack of clear connection between the understandings of a LOC-I by human pilots and quantitative engineering metrics. The outcomes suggest LOC-I detection criteria should be revised towards including qualitative pilots\' opinion, i.e., human-related factors must be given proper attention prior to the introduction and spread of potential \"LOC-I solutions\" solely based on quantitative metrics. |
id |
USP_3c6c1fc30da0b617949fc60e246efbc7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:teses.usp.br:tde-08022022-160017 |
network_acronym_str |
USP |
network_name_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository_id_str |
2721 |
spelling |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditionsUm comparativo entre percepção de pilotos humanos e parâmetros de voo em potenciais condições de perda de controle em vooAircraft dynamicsControlabilidadeControllabilityCooper-Harper scaleDinâmica da aeronaveEnsaio em vooEscala Cooper-HarperFlight safetyFlight simulatorFlight testHuman-machine interactionInteração humano-máquinaLoss of control in flightPerda de controle em vooQLCQLCSegurança de vooSimulador de vooLoss of Control in Flight (LOC-I) is the most lethal type of air accidents in recent aviation history; however, its characteristics are still not well understood, especially from the perspective of the human pilot. This research analysed whether (and to which extent) a quantitative LOC-I detection criterion correlates with subjective pilots\' opinions on the controllability of an aircraft. Six flight test pilots flew a Boeing 777 in four scenarios (different combinations of typical LOC-I precursors) in a flight simulator, and performed 13 manoeuvres specifically designed to assess different aspects of controllability. The aircraft controllability category was determined from the pilots\' qualitative opinions for each manoeuvre, via the so-called Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHR), and from recorded flight data, according to the Quantitative Loss of Control Criteria (QLC). Statistical correlation tests determined the degree of correlation between the approaches. A positive weak statistically significant correlation was found between the controllability categories resulting from both CHRs and QLC, thus revealing a lack of clear connection between the understandings of a LOC-I by human pilots and quantitative engineering metrics. The outcomes suggest LOC-I detection criteria should be revised towards including qualitative pilots\' opinion, i.e., human-related factors must be given proper attention prior to the introduction and spread of potential \"LOC-I solutions\" solely based on quantitative metrics.A Perda de Controle em Voo (LOC-I) é o tipo de acidente aéreo mais letal na história recente da aviação, mas suas características ainda não são bem compreendidas, especialmente sob a perspectiva do piloto humano. Esta pesquisa analisou se (e em que medida) um critério quantitativo de detecção de LOC-I correlaciona-se com a percepção subjetiva de pilotos humanos acerca da controlabilidade de uma aeronave. Em um simulador de voo, seis pilotos voaram um Boeing 777 em quatro cenários LOC-I (diferentes combinações de precursores típicos) e realizaram um conjunto de 13 manobras projetadas especificamente para avaliar diferentes aspectos de controlabilidade. Para cada manobra, a categoria de controlabilidade da aeronave foi determinada a partir da opinião qualitativa do piloto, por meio da chamada Escala de Classificação Cooper- Harper (CHR), e dos dados de voo, por meio do Critério de Perda Quantitativa de Controle (QLC). Testes de correlação estatística foram executados para determinar o grau de correlação entre as abordagens. Encontrou-se correlação positiva fraca estatisticamente significativa entre as categorias de controlabilidade decorrentes do CHRs e do QLC. Dada a fraca correlação, conclui-se que não há clara conexão entre o que os pilotos humanos entendem como LOC-I e o que as métricas de engenharia quantitativas sinalizam ser. Os resultados sugerem que os critérios de detecção de LOC-I devem ser revisados para incluir a opinião qualitativa de pilotos, ou seja, antes de introduzir e difundir potenciais \"soluções LOC-I\" unicamente baseadas em métricas quantitativas, fatores humanos devem ser considerados em sua devida atenção.Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USPBidinotto, Jorge HenriqueMacedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de2021-12-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesisapplication/pdfhttps://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USPinstname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP)instacron:USPLiberar o conteúdo para acesso público.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesseng2022-02-10T18:22:05Zoai:teses.usp.br:tde-08022022-160017Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttp://www.teses.usp.br/PUBhttp://www.teses.usp.br/cgi-bin/mtd2br.plvirginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.bropendoar:27212022-02-10T18:22:05Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions Um comparativo entre percepção de pilotos humanos e parâmetros de voo em potenciais condições de perda de controle em voo |
title |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions |
spellingShingle |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de Aircraft dynamics Controlabilidade Controllability Cooper-Harper scale Dinâmica da aeronave Ensaio em voo Escala Cooper-Harper Flight safety Flight simulator Flight test Human-machine interaction Interação humano-máquina Loss of control in flight Perda de controle em voo QLC QLC Segurança de voo Simulador de voo |
title_short |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions |
title_full |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions |
title_fullStr |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions |
title_sort |
A comparison between qualitative pilots\' opinion and quantitative flight data on potential loss of control in flight conditions |
author |
Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de |
author_facet |
Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Bidinotto, Jorge Henrique |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Macedo, João Paulo Costa Antunes de |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Aircraft dynamics Controlabilidade Controllability Cooper-Harper scale Dinâmica da aeronave Ensaio em voo Escala Cooper-Harper Flight safety Flight simulator Flight test Human-machine interaction Interação humano-máquina Loss of control in flight Perda de controle em voo QLC QLC Segurança de voo Simulador de voo |
topic |
Aircraft dynamics Controlabilidade Controllability Cooper-Harper scale Dinâmica da aeronave Ensaio em voo Escala Cooper-Harper Flight safety Flight simulator Flight test Human-machine interaction Interação humano-máquina Loss of control in flight Perda de controle em voo QLC QLC Segurança de voo Simulador de voo |
description |
Loss of Control in Flight (LOC-I) is the most lethal type of air accidents in recent aviation history; however, its characteristics are still not well understood, especially from the perspective of the human pilot. This research analysed whether (and to which extent) a quantitative LOC-I detection criterion correlates with subjective pilots\' opinions on the controllability of an aircraft. Six flight test pilots flew a Boeing 777 in four scenarios (different combinations of typical LOC-I precursors) in a flight simulator, and performed 13 manoeuvres specifically designed to assess different aspects of controllability. The aircraft controllability category was determined from the pilots\' qualitative opinions for each manoeuvre, via the so-called Cooper-Harper Rating Scale (CHR), and from recorded flight data, according to the Quantitative Loss of Control Criteria (QLC). Statistical correlation tests determined the degree of correlation between the approaches. A positive weak statistically significant correlation was found between the controllability categories resulting from both CHRs and QLC, thus revealing a lack of clear connection between the understandings of a LOC-I by human pilots and quantitative engineering metrics. The outcomes suggest LOC-I detection criteria should be revised towards including qualitative pilots\' opinion, i.e., human-related factors must be given proper attention prior to the introduction and spread of potential \"LOC-I solutions\" solely based on quantitative metrics. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-12-14 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis |
format |
masterThesis |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/ |
url |
https://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/18/18161/tde-08022022-160017/ |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Liberar o conteúdo para acesso público. |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.coverage.none.fl_str_mv |
|
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digitais de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP instname:Universidade de São Paulo (USP) instacron:USP |
instname_str |
Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
instacron_str |
USP |
institution |
USP |
reponame_str |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
collection |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações da USP - Universidade de São Paulo (USP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
virginia@if.usp.br|| atendimento@aguia.usp.br||virginia@if.usp.br |
_version_ |
1815256793099534336 |