Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2013 |
Outros Autores: | |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Calidoscópio (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2013.112.05 |
Resumo: | The use of grammatically incorrect English by foreign speakers, either in the classroom or out of it, is often seen as reproachable. Most teachers of English have the American or British speaker as the model to which their students should aspire. This belief in grammatical propriety can manifest itself in many ways throughout society, and mistakes in the use of Standard English can often trigger public mockery, or else be taken as a sign of a person’s poor education. By analyzing a recent speech event in Brazil – a media interview by soccer coach Joel Santana in which his “Portenglish” answers to a foreign journalist became the target of public derision – our article questions whether Standard English is indeed the best model to apply in the classroom.The article begins by examining the limitations of the thesis of imperialism to explain the ubiquity of the English language today; then we go on to apply the theses of Worldliness and Glocalization to our case study.We argue that Santana’s creative (or improper, in his critics’ opinion) use of English is a case of “Glocality”. Finally, we conclude by suggesting that less rigid standards of language learning would avoid stifling students’ learning capacities, and let them flourish in an environment to which they can relate.Key words: Teaching and learning of English, Standard English and World English, superdiverse repertories. |
id |
Unisinos-3_b49afb3a23b7bfbdc0a5e361ce948d63 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/4036 |
network_acronym_str |
Unisinos-3 |
network_name_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and GrouchoStandard English & World English: entre o siso e o risoThe use of grammatically incorrect English by foreign speakers, either in the classroom or out of it, is often seen as reproachable. Most teachers of English have the American or British speaker as the model to which their students should aspire. This belief in grammatical propriety can manifest itself in many ways throughout society, and mistakes in the use of Standard English can often trigger public mockery, or else be taken as a sign of a person’s poor education. By analyzing a recent speech event in Brazil – a media interview by soccer coach Joel Santana in which his “Portenglish” answers to a foreign journalist became the target of public derision – our article questions whether Standard English is indeed the best model to apply in the classroom.The article begins by examining the limitations of the thesis of imperialism to explain the ubiquity of the English language today; then we go on to apply the theses of Worldliness and Glocalization to our case study.We argue that Santana’s creative (or improper, in his critics’ opinion) use of English is a case of “Glocality”. Finally, we conclude by suggesting that less rigid standards of language learning would avoid stifling students’ learning capacities, and let them flourish in an environment to which they can relate.Key words: Teaching and learning of English, Standard English and World English, superdiverse repertories.O uso do inglês gramaticalmente incorreto por falantes estrangeiros, em sala de aula ou fora dela, é comumente visto como reprovável. Muitos professores de inglês têm no falante americano ou britânico culto o modelo a que seus alunos devem aspirar. A crença na propriedade gramatical pode se manifestar de diferentes modos na sociedade, e equívocos no uso do inglês padrão podem desencadear escárnio público ou serem vistos como índice de baixa escolaridade. Analisando um evento de fala recente no Brasil – uma entrevista midiática pelo técnico Joel Santana na qual suas respostas em “portinglês” a um jornalista estrangeiro se tornaram alvo de derrisão –, nosso artigo indaga se o “inglês padrão” é, de fato, o melhor modelo a ser perseguido em sala da aula. Inicialmente, examinamos as limitações da tese do imperialismo para explicar a ubiquidade da língua inglesa; então passamos para as teses da mundialização e glocalização. Argumentamos que o uso criativo do inglês (ou impróprio, na opinião de seus críticos) por Joel Santana é um caso de “glocalidade”. Finalmente, concluímos sugerindo que padrões menos rígidos de aprendizagem de língua poderiam evitar sufocar as capacidades dos alunos, e deixá-las florescer em um ambiente a que possam se relacionar.Palavras-chave: Ensino e aprendizagem de inglês, Standard English e World English, repertórios superdiversos.Unisinos2013-08-29info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2013.112.05Calidoscópio; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2013): May/August; 153-166Calidoscópio; v. 11 n. 2 (2013): Maio/Agosto; 153-1662177-6202reponame:Calidoscópio (Online)instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)instacron:Unisinosporhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2013.112.05/1938Assis-Peterson, Ana AntôniaCox, Maria Inês Pagliariniinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2013-08-30T23:14:36Zoai:ojs2.revistas.unisinos.br:article/4036Revistahttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopioPUBhttps://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/oaicmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br2177-62022177-6202opendoar:2013-08-30T23:14:36Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho Standard English & World English: entre o siso e o riso |
title |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho |
spellingShingle |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho Assis-Peterson, Ana Antônia |
title_short |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho |
title_full |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho |
title_fullStr |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho |
title_full_unstemmed |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho |
title_sort |
Standard English & World English: between Karl and Groucho |
author |
Assis-Peterson, Ana Antônia |
author_facet |
Assis-Peterson, Ana Antônia Cox, Maria Inês Pagliarini |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Cox, Maria Inês Pagliarini |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Assis-Peterson, Ana Antônia Cox, Maria Inês Pagliarini |
description |
The use of grammatically incorrect English by foreign speakers, either in the classroom or out of it, is often seen as reproachable. Most teachers of English have the American or British speaker as the model to which their students should aspire. This belief in grammatical propriety can manifest itself in many ways throughout society, and mistakes in the use of Standard English can often trigger public mockery, or else be taken as a sign of a person’s poor education. By analyzing a recent speech event in Brazil – a media interview by soccer coach Joel Santana in which his “Portenglish” answers to a foreign journalist became the target of public derision – our article questions whether Standard English is indeed the best model to apply in the classroom.The article begins by examining the limitations of the thesis of imperialism to explain the ubiquity of the English language today; then we go on to apply the theses of Worldliness and Glocalization to our case study.We argue that Santana’s creative (or improper, in his critics’ opinion) use of English is a case of “Glocality”. Finally, we conclude by suggesting that less rigid standards of language learning would avoid stifling students’ learning capacities, and let them flourish in an environment to which they can relate.Key words: Teaching and learning of English, Standard English and World English, superdiverse repertories. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2013-08-29 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2013.112.05 |
url |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2013.112.05 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://revistas.unisinos.br/index.php/calidoscopio/article/view/cld.2013.112.05/1938 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Unisinos |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio; Vol. 11 No. 2 (2013): May/August; 153-166 Calidoscópio; v. 11 n. 2 (2013): Maio/Agosto; 153-166 2177-6202 reponame:Calidoscópio (Online) instname:Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) instacron:Unisinos |
instname_str |
Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
instacron_str |
Unisinos |
institution |
Unisinos |
reponame_str |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
collection |
Calidoscópio (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Calidoscópio (Online) - Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (UNISINOS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
cmira@unisinos.br || cmira@unisinos.br |
_version_ |
1792203885211811840 |