Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Batista,Mariana
Data de Publicação: 2017
Tipo de documento: Relatório
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Political Science Review
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100501
Resumo: Portfolio allocation is the keystone of coalition government analysis. It constitutes the fundamental payoff in coalition formation, providing access to government decision-making. However, are all portfolios the same or have the same weight in government decision-making? This research note presents a measure of portfolio differences based on three dimensions: policy, office, and budget. Factor analysis is used to generate a composite indicator of portfolio importance in Brazil from 1999 to 2014. Results show that portfolios vary significantly in importance in each of the three dimensions, meaning that a ministry of little importance in one dimension can be very important in another. With policy, office, and budget combined, the most important ministry is the Ministry of Finance and the least important is the Ministry of Fishery. This indicator is the first step to summarize the differences between ministries that can be used to inform empirical analysis about coalition formation and governance in Brazil.
id ABCP-1_910a7e230e2d5fc0860855b1701c8bd6
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1981-38212017000100501
network_acronym_str ABCP-1
network_name_str Brazilian Political Science Review
repository_id_str
spelling Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in BrazilCoalition governmentsportfolio differencespolicyofficebudgetPortfolio allocation is the keystone of coalition government analysis. It constitutes the fundamental payoff in coalition formation, providing access to government decision-making. However, are all portfolios the same or have the same weight in government decision-making? This research note presents a measure of portfolio differences based on three dimensions: policy, office, and budget. Factor analysis is used to generate a composite indicator of portfolio importance in Brazil from 1999 to 2014. Results show that portfolios vary significantly in importance in each of the three dimensions, meaning that a ministry of little importance in one dimension can be very important in another. With policy, office, and budget combined, the most important ministry is the Ministry of Finance and the least important is the Ministry of Fishery. This indicator is the first step to summarize the differences between ministries that can be used to inform empirical analysis about coalition formation and governance in Brazil.Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/reportinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100501Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.1 2017reponame:Brazilian Political Science Reviewinstname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)instacron:ABCP10.1590/1981-382120170001000600info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBatista,Marianaeng2017-03-27T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1981-38212017000100501Revistahttps://brazilianpoliticalsciencereview.org/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpbpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br1981-38211981-3821opendoar:2017-03-27T00:00Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
title Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
spellingShingle Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
Batista,Mariana
Coalition governments
portfolio differences
policy
office
budget
title_short Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
title_full Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
title_fullStr Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
title_sort Taking Portfolios Difference Seriously: A Composite Measure Based on Policy, Office, and Budget in Brazil
author Batista,Mariana
author_facet Batista,Mariana
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Batista,Mariana
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Coalition governments
portfolio differences
policy
office
budget
topic Coalition governments
portfolio differences
policy
office
budget
description Portfolio allocation is the keystone of coalition government analysis. It constitutes the fundamental payoff in coalition formation, providing access to government decision-making. However, are all portfolios the same or have the same weight in government decision-making? This research note presents a measure of portfolio differences based on three dimensions: policy, office, and budget. Factor analysis is used to generate a composite indicator of portfolio importance in Brazil from 1999 to 2014. Results show that portfolios vary significantly in importance in each of the three dimensions, meaning that a ministry of little importance in one dimension can be very important in another. With policy, office, and budget combined, the most important ministry is the Ministry of Finance and the least important is the Ministry of Fishery. This indicator is the first step to summarize the differences between ministries that can be used to inform empirical analysis about coalition formation and governance in Brazil.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/report
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format report
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100501
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1981-38212017000100501
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1981-382120170001000600
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review v.11 n.1 2017
reponame:Brazilian Political Science Review
instname:Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron:ABCP
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
instacron_str ABCP
institution ABCP
reponame_str Brazilian Political Science Review
collection Brazilian Political Science Review
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Political Science Review - Associação Brasileira de Ciência Política (ABCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv bpsr@brazilianpoliticalsciencareview.org||bpsr@bpsr.org.br
_version_ 1754302908164210688