A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Bártová,Blanka
Data de Publicação: 2022
Outros Autores: Bína,Vladislav, Váchová,Lucie
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Production
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100401
Resumo: Abstract Paper aims This research aims to analyze the primary studies published in recent years focusing on defect detection or classification in manufacturing and extract information about frequently used data mining (DM) methods, their accuracy, strengths, and limitations. Originality Industrial production is now undergoing a dynamic transformation in the context of Industry 4.0, where implementation of data mining is a frequently discussed topic, and such an overall summary is missing. Research method In this study, the PRISMA-driven systematic literature review is combined with the approach defined by Kitchenham (2004). Main findings The most frequently used data mining methods for defect detection are Bayesian network (BN) and Support vector machine (SVM). Besides previously mentioned methods, the Decision trees (DT) and Clustering are often used for defect classification. Neural Networks (NN) use is common for both defect detection and classification. DT, together with the Genetic algorithm (GA) and SVM, achieved the highest average accuracy. Recently, authors often combine different DM methods, and also methods for data dimensionality reduction are often used. Implications for theory and practice This study contributes to the quality management literature by extending a summary of recently used DM methods for defect detection and classification. This summary can help researchers choose a suitable method and build models for achieving its research purpose.
id ABEPRO-1_ea43052b0da795f7cc37efec81b54532
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100401
network_acronym_str ABEPRO-1
network_name_str Production
repository_id_str
spelling A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industryData miningDefectDetectionClassificationManufacturingAbstract Paper aims This research aims to analyze the primary studies published in recent years focusing on defect detection or classification in manufacturing and extract information about frequently used data mining (DM) methods, their accuracy, strengths, and limitations. Originality Industrial production is now undergoing a dynamic transformation in the context of Industry 4.0, where implementation of data mining is a frequently discussed topic, and such an overall summary is missing. Research method In this study, the PRISMA-driven systematic literature review is combined with the approach defined by Kitchenham (2004). Main findings The most frequently used data mining methods for defect detection are Bayesian network (BN) and Support vector machine (SVM). Besides previously mentioned methods, the Decision trees (DT) and Clustering are often used for defect classification. Neural Networks (NN) use is common for both defect detection and classification. DT, together with the Genetic algorithm (GA) and SVM, achieved the highest average accuracy. Recently, authors often combine different DM methods, and also methods for data dimensionality reduction are often used. Implications for theory and practice This study contributes to the quality management literature by extending a summary of recently used DM methods for defect detection and classification. This summary can help researchers choose a suitable method and build models for achieving its research purpose.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção2022-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100401Production v.32 2022reponame:Productioninstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPRO10.1590/0103-6513.20210097info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessBártová,BlankaBína,VladislavVáchová,Lucieeng2022-01-20T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-65132022000100401Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/prod/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||production@editoracubo.com.br1980-54110103-6513opendoar:2022-01-20T00:00Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
title A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
spellingShingle A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
Bártová,Blanka
Data mining
Defect
Detection
Classification
Manufacturing
title_short A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
title_full A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
title_fullStr A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
title_full_unstemmed A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
title_sort A PRISMA-driven systematic review of data mining methods used for defects detection and classification in the manufacturing industry
author Bártová,Blanka
author_facet Bártová,Blanka
Bína,Vladislav
Váchová,Lucie
author_role author
author2 Bína,Vladislav
Váchová,Lucie
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bártová,Blanka
Bína,Vladislav
Váchová,Lucie
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Data mining
Defect
Detection
Classification
Manufacturing
topic Data mining
Defect
Detection
Classification
Manufacturing
description Abstract Paper aims This research aims to analyze the primary studies published in recent years focusing on defect detection or classification in manufacturing and extract information about frequently used data mining (DM) methods, their accuracy, strengths, and limitations. Originality Industrial production is now undergoing a dynamic transformation in the context of Industry 4.0, where implementation of data mining is a frequently discussed topic, and such an overall summary is missing. Research method In this study, the PRISMA-driven systematic literature review is combined with the approach defined by Kitchenham (2004). Main findings The most frequently used data mining methods for defect detection are Bayesian network (BN) and Support vector machine (SVM). Besides previously mentioned methods, the Decision trees (DT) and Clustering are often used for defect classification. Neural Networks (NN) use is common for both defect detection and classification. DT, together with the Genetic algorithm (GA) and SVM, achieved the highest average accuracy. Recently, authors often combine different DM methods, and also methods for data dimensionality reduction are often used. Implications for theory and practice This study contributes to the quality management literature by extending a summary of recently used DM methods for defect detection and classification. This summary can help researchers choose a suitable method and build models for achieving its research purpose.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100401
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-65132022000100401
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-6513.20210097
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Production v.32 2022
reponame:Production
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron:ABEPRO
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
instacron_str ABEPRO
institution ABEPRO
reponame_str Production
collection Production
repository.name.fl_str_mv Production - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||production@editoracubo.com.br
_version_ 1754213154884157440