Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2010 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV52N2_2008_P4 |
Resumo: | The identification of dispersion effects is a very important stage in developing robust products and processes. Several methods to identify dispersion effects are present in statistical and quality engineering literature, especially methods which use 2K or 2K-punreplicated factorial designs, such as Box-Meyer, Harvey, Brenemann-Nair and Bergman- Hynén methods. In this paper we considered generalizations of these methods for replicatedexperiments, and compare them by Monte Carlo simulations, analyzing sensitivity and specificity indicators. We also included joint generalized linear models (joint GLMs) in our comparison. The joint GLMs provides an interesting general framework to fit mean and variance models and it is recommend for this proposal, but it needs specialized software. If the main focus is found only in one or two higher effects, then the Box-Meyer method is an efficient and very simple method. When only one non-null dispersion effect is present, our simulation showed that the Box-Meyer method is the best, even when compared withthe joint GLMs. When two non-null dispersion effects are present, the Box-Meyer method is biased, but surprisingly our simulation showed that this method works well. |
id |
ABEPRO_73a39fa673addc96d05d90174e3e54da |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/7 |
network_acronym_str |
ABEPRO |
network_name_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial DesignThe identification of dispersion effects is a very important stage in developing robust products and processes. Several methods to identify dispersion effects are present in statistical and quality engineering literature, especially methods which use 2K or 2K-punreplicated factorial designs, such as Box-Meyer, Harvey, Brenemann-Nair and Bergman- Hynén methods. In this paper we considered generalizations of these methods for replicatedexperiments, and compare them by Monte Carlo simulations, analyzing sensitivity and specificity indicators. We also included joint generalized linear models (joint GLMs) in our comparison. The joint GLMs provides an interesting general framework to fit mean and variance models and it is recommend for this proposal, but it needs specialized software. If the main focus is found only in one or two higher effects, then the Box-Meyer method is an efficient and very simple method. When only one non-null dispersion effect is present, our simulation showed that the Box-Meyer method is the best, even when compared withthe joint GLMs. When two non-null dispersion effects are present, the Box-Meyer method is biased, but surprisingly our simulation showed that this method works well.Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO)2010-02-07info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-reviewed Articleapplication/pdfhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV52N2_2008_P4Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2008): December, 2008; 73-912237-8960reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online)instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)instacron:ABEPROenghttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV52N2_2008_P4/pdf_5Mattos, Viviane LeiteBarbetta, Pedro AlbertoAndrade, Dalton Franciscoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2019-04-04T07:29:28Zoai:ojs.bjopm.org.br:article/7Revistahttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopmONGhttps://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/oaibjopm.journal@gmail.com2237-89601679-8171opendoar:2023-03-13T09:44:59.729274Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design |
title |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design |
spellingShingle |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design Mattos, Viviane Leite |
title_short |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design |
title_full |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design |
title_fullStr |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design |
title_full_unstemmed |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design |
title_sort |
Identification of Dispersion Effects in 2k Factorial Design |
author |
Mattos, Viviane Leite |
author_facet |
Mattos, Viviane Leite Barbetta, Pedro Alberto Andrade, Dalton Francisco |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Barbetta, Pedro Alberto Andrade, Dalton Francisco |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Mattos, Viviane Leite Barbetta, Pedro Alberto Andrade, Dalton Francisco |
description |
The identification of dispersion effects is a very important stage in developing robust products and processes. Several methods to identify dispersion effects are present in statistical and quality engineering literature, especially methods which use 2K or 2K-punreplicated factorial designs, such as Box-Meyer, Harvey, Brenemann-Nair and Bergman- Hynén methods. In this paper we considered generalizations of these methods for replicatedexperiments, and compare them by Monte Carlo simulations, analyzing sensitivity and specificity indicators. We also included joint generalized linear models (joint GLMs) in our comparison. The joint GLMs provides an interesting general framework to fit mean and variance models and it is recommend for this proposal, but it needs specialized software. If the main focus is found only in one or two higher effects, then the Box-Meyer method is an efficient and very simple method. When only one non-null dispersion effect is present, our simulation showed that the Box-Meyer method is the best, even when compared withthe joint GLMs. When two non-null dispersion effects are present, the Box-Meyer method is biased, but surprisingly our simulation showed that this method works well. |
publishDate |
2010 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-02-07 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-reviewed Article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV52N2_2008_P4 |
url |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV52N2_2008_P4 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://bjopm.org.br/bjopm/article/view/BJV52N2_2008_P4/pdf_5 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Association for Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (ABEPRO) |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management; Vol. 5 No. 2 (2008): December, 2008; 73-91 2237-8960 reponame:Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) instacron:ABEPRO |
instname_str |
Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
instacron_str |
ABEPRO |
institution |
ABEPRO |
reponame_str |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
collection |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management (Online) - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia de Produção (ABEPRO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
bjopm.journal@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1797051459536158720 |