Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Pereira,P. A. P.
Data de Publicação: 2013
Outros Autores: Souza,V. R., Carneiro,J. D. S., Borges,S. V., Ferreira,L. O., Queiroz,F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000300011
Resumo: The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical and physicochemical properties of different brands of traditional (A, B and E), low calorie (C) and sugar-free (D) guava preserves. The results of these analysis indicated that there are differences in the physical and physicochemical properties of the different brands studied, and the partial and/or total exclusion of sugar from guava alters its physical and physicochemical properties, making the product redder; even added body and sweetening agents are incapable of conferring properties similar to those of conventional products. Regarding the relaxation test, the Maxwell model was the best for sample discrimination. The results also showed that the samples have a traditional standardization and that the sample labeled "low calorie" has a tendency to exhibit a composition similar to the conventional sample, which is evidence that brand (C) cannot be considered to be low calorie.
id ABEQ-1_95ca771acad51f66b126069f71fa20d4
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0104-66322013000300011
network_acronym_str ABEQ-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository_id_str
spelling Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preservesColor parametersTexture profile analysisStress relaxation testThe aim of this study was to evaluate the physical and physicochemical properties of different brands of traditional (A, B and E), low calorie (C) and sugar-free (D) guava preserves. The results of these analysis indicated that there are differences in the physical and physicochemical properties of the different brands studied, and the partial and/or total exclusion of sugar from guava alters its physical and physicochemical properties, making the product redder; even added body and sweetening agents are incapable of conferring properties similar to those of conventional products. Regarding the relaxation test, the Maxwell model was the best for sample discrimination. The results also showed that the samples have a traditional standardization and that the sample labeled "low calorie" has a tendency to exhibit a composition similar to the conventional sample, which is evidence that brand (C) cannot be considered to be low calorie.Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering2013-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000300011Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.30 n.3 2013reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineeringinstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)instacron:ABEQ10.1590/S0104-66322013000300011info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPereira,P. A. P.Souza,V. R.Carneiro,J. D. S.Borges,S. V.Ferreira,L. O.Queiroz,F.eng2013-09-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0104-66322013000300011Revistahttps://www.scielo.br/j/bjce/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br1678-43830104-6632opendoar:2013-09-03T00:00Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
title Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
spellingShingle Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
Pereira,P. A. P.
Color parameters
Texture profile analysis
Stress relaxation test
title_short Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
title_full Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
title_fullStr Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
title_full_unstemmed Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
title_sort Physical and physicochemical evaluation of different brands of traditional, low calorie and sugar-free guava preserves
author Pereira,P. A. P.
author_facet Pereira,P. A. P.
Souza,V. R.
Carneiro,J. D. S.
Borges,S. V.
Ferreira,L. O.
Queiroz,F.
author_role author
author2 Souza,V. R.
Carneiro,J. D. S.
Borges,S. V.
Ferreira,L. O.
Queiroz,F.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pereira,P. A. P.
Souza,V. R.
Carneiro,J. D. S.
Borges,S. V.
Ferreira,L. O.
Queiroz,F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Color parameters
Texture profile analysis
Stress relaxation test
topic Color parameters
Texture profile analysis
Stress relaxation test
description The aim of this study was to evaluate the physical and physicochemical properties of different brands of traditional (A, B and E), low calorie (C) and sugar-free (D) guava preserves. The results of these analysis indicated that there are differences in the physical and physicochemical properties of the different brands studied, and the partial and/or total exclusion of sugar from guava alters its physical and physicochemical properties, making the product redder; even added body and sweetening agents are incapable of conferring properties similar to those of conventional products. Regarding the relaxation test, the Maxwell model was the best for sample discrimination. The results also showed that the samples have a traditional standardization and that the sample labeled "low calorie" has a tendency to exhibit a composition similar to the conventional sample, which is evidence that brand (C) cannot be considered to be low calorie.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2013-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000300011
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0104-66322013000300011
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S0104-66322013000300011
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Society of Chemical Engineering
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering v.30 n.3 2013
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron:ABEQ
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
instacron_str ABEQ
institution ABEQ
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
collection Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Chemical Engineering - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Química (ABEQ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rgiudici@usp.br||rgiudici@usp.br
_version_ 1754213173943074816