Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Lins,Catarina C.
Data de Publicação: 2016
Outros Autores: Prado,Diego T., Joaquim,Andrei F.
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000900745
Resumo: ABSTRACT Surgical treatment is well accepted for patients with traumatic cervical facet joint dislocations (CFD), but there is uncertainty over which approach is better: anterior, posterior or combined. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the indications for anterior and posterior approaches in the management of CFD. Anterior approaches can restore cervical lordosis, and cause less postoperative pain and less wound problems. Posterior approaches are useful for direct reduction of locked facet joints and provide stronger fixation from a biomechanical point of view. Combined approaches can be used in more complex cases. Although both anterior and posterior approaches can be used interchangeably, there are some patients who may benefit from one of them over the other, as discussed in this review. Surgeons who treat cervical spine trauma should be able to perform both procedures as well as combined approaches to adequately manage CFD and improve patients’ final outcomes.
id ABNEURO-1_9dbd30429446ef5793a886611a9e8c41
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0004-282X2016000900745
network_acronym_str ABNEURO-1
network_name_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?spinedislocationsbones fracturessurgeryABSTRACT Surgical treatment is well accepted for patients with traumatic cervical facet joint dislocations (CFD), but there is uncertainty over which approach is better: anterior, posterior or combined. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the indications for anterior and posterior approaches in the management of CFD. Anterior approaches can restore cervical lordosis, and cause less postoperative pain and less wound problems. Posterior approaches are useful for direct reduction of locked facet joints and provide stronger fixation from a biomechanical point of view. Combined approaches can be used in more complex cases. Although both anterior and posterior approaches can be used interchangeably, there are some patients who may benefit from one of them over the other, as discussed in this review. Surgeons who treat cervical spine trauma should be able to perform both procedures as well as combined approaches to adequately manage CFD and improve patients’ final outcomes.Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2016-09-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000900745Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.74 n.9 2016reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20160078info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLins,Catarina C.Prado,Diego T.Joaquim,Andrei F.eng2016-09-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2016000900745Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2016-09-28T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
title Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
spellingShingle Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
Lins,Catarina C.
spine
dislocations
bones fractures
surgery
title_short Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
title_full Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
title_fullStr Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
title_full_unstemmed Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
title_sort Surgical treatment of traumatic cervical facet dislocation: anterior, posterior or combined approaches?
author Lins,Catarina C.
author_facet Lins,Catarina C.
Prado,Diego T.
Joaquim,Andrei F.
author_role author
author2 Prado,Diego T.
Joaquim,Andrei F.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lins,Catarina C.
Prado,Diego T.
Joaquim,Andrei F.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv spine
dislocations
bones fractures
surgery
topic spine
dislocations
bones fractures
surgery
description ABSTRACT Surgical treatment is well accepted for patients with traumatic cervical facet joint dislocations (CFD), but there is uncertainty over which approach is better: anterior, posterior or combined. We performed a systematic literature review to evaluate the indications for anterior and posterior approaches in the management of CFD. Anterior approaches can restore cervical lordosis, and cause less postoperative pain and less wound problems. Posterior approaches are useful for direct reduction of locked facet joints and provide stronger fixation from a biomechanical point of view. Combined approaches can be used in more complex cases. Although both anterior and posterior approaches can be used interchangeably, there are some patients who may benefit from one of them over the other, as discussed in this review. Surgeons who treat cervical spine trauma should be able to perform both procedures as well as combined approaches to adequately manage CFD and improve patients’ final outcomes.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-09-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000900745
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2016000900745
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0004-282X20160078
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.74 n.9 2016
reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron:ABNEURO
instname_str Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
instacron_str ABNEURO
institution ABNEURO
reponame_str Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
collection Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org
_version_ 1754212781035356160