Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2015 |
Outros Autores: | , , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | eng |
Título da fonte: | Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
Texto Completo: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2015000500013 |
Resumo: | The SLICS (Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System) was proposed to help in the decision-making of sub-axial cervical spine trauma (SCST), even though the literature assessing its safety and efficacy is scarce. Method We compared a cohort series of patients surgically treated based on surgeon’s preference with patients treated based on the SLICS. Results From 2009-10, 12 patients were included. The SLICS score ranged from 2 to 9 points (mean of 5.5). Two patients had the SLICS < 4 points. From 2011-13, 28 patients were included. The SLICS score ranged from 4 to 9 points (mean of 6). There was no neurological deterioration in any group. Conclusion After using the SLICS there was a decrease in the number of patients with less severe injuries that were treated surgically. This suggests that the SLICS can be helpful in differentiating mild from severe injuries, potentially improving the results of treatment. |
id |
ABNEURO-1_b208050af644fac7f22db15582be0aa4 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0004-282X2015000500013 |
network_acronym_str |
ABNEURO-1 |
network_name_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuriessub-axial cervical spineSLICSspinal cord injuryspine traumaclassificationtreatmentThe SLICS (Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System) was proposed to help in the decision-making of sub-axial cervical spine trauma (SCST), even though the literature assessing its safety and efficacy is scarce. Method We compared a cohort series of patients surgically treated based on surgeon’s preference with patients treated based on the SLICS. Results From 2009-10, 12 patients were included. The SLICS score ranged from 2 to 9 points (mean of 5.5). Two patients had the SLICS < 4 points. From 2011-13, 28 patients were included. The SLICS score ranged from 4 to 9 points (mean of 6). There was no neurological deterioration in any group. Conclusion After using the SLICS there was a decrease in the number of patients with less severe injuries that were treated surgically. This suggests that the SLICS can be helpful in differentiating mild from severe injuries, potentially improving the results of treatment. Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO2015-05-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2015000500013Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.73 n.5 2015reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online)instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologiainstacron:ABNEURO10.1590/0004-282X20150022info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCruz,Halisson Y. F. daJoaquim,Andrei F.Tedeschi,HelderPatel,Alpesh A.eng2015-06-25T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0004-282X2015000500013Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/anphttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org1678-42270004-282Xopendoar:2015-06-25T00:00Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries |
title |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries |
spellingShingle |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries Cruz,Halisson Y. F. da sub-axial cervical spine SLICS spinal cord injury spine trauma classification treatment |
title_short |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries |
title_full |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries |
title_fullStr |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries |
title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries |
title_sort |
Evaluation of the SLICS use in the treatment of subaxial cervical spine injuries |
author |
Cruz,Halisson Y. F. da |
author_facet |
Cruz,Halisson Y. F. da Joaquim,Andrei F. Tedeschi,Helder Patel,Alpesh A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Joaquim,Andrei F. Tedeschi,Helder Patel,Alpesh A. |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Cruz,Halisson Y. F. da Joaquim,Andrei F. Tedeschi,Helder Patel,Alpesh A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
sub-axial cervical spine SLICS spinal cord injury spine trauma classification treatment |
topic |
sub-axial cervical spine SLICS spinal cord injury spine trauma classification treatment |
description |
The SLICS (Sub-axial Cervical Spine Injury Classification System) was proposed to help in the decision-making of sub-axial cervical spine trauma (SCST), even though the literature assessing its safety and efficacy is scarce. Method We compared a cohort series of patients surgically treated based on surgeon’s preference with patients treated based on the SLICS. Results From 2009-10, 12 patients were included. The SLICS score ranged from 2 to 9 points (mean of 5.5). Two patients had the SLICS < 4 points. From 2011-13, 28 patients were included. The SLICS score ranged from 4 to 9 points (mean of 6). There was no neurological deterioration in any group. Conclusion After using the SLICS there was a decrease in the number of patients with less severe injuries that were treated surgically. This suggests that the SLICS can be helpful in differentiating mild from severe injuries, potentially improving the results of treatment. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-05-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2015000500013 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0004-282X2015000500013 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0004-282X20150022 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia - ABNEURO |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria v.73 n.5 2015 reponame:Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) instname:Academia Brasileira de Neurologia instacron:ABNEURO |
instname_str |
Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
instacron_str |
ABNEURO |
institution |
ABNEURO |
reponame_str |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
collection |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria (Online) - Academia Brasileira de Neurologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista.arquivos@abneuro.org |
_version_ |
1754212777909551104 |